Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JUNE 2016

Drawing the line: High Court upholds Senate electoral reforms

The High Court has ruled that these recent reforms made to the Senate electoral process were constitutionally valid.

AustraliaGovernment, Public Sector
Ken Powell (Formerly With Clayton Utz)
Ken Powell (Formerly With Clayton Utz)
Author LinkedIn connections

Key Points:

The High Court considered, and rejected, five arguments against the reforms.

On 13 May 2016, the High Court ruled that recent reforms made to the Senate electoral process were constitutionally valid. The decision underscores that the Commonwealth Parliament's constitutional power to prescribe the method of choosing Senators is broad. The decision means that the reforms will be effective for the upcoming double dissolution election, in which all Senate seats will be contested (Day v Australian Electoral Officer for the State of South Australia [2016] HCA 20.).

The reforms

In the proceedings, incumbent Senator for South Australia Robert Day (and others) challenged the constitutional validity of amendments made to the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth) by the Commonwealth Electoral Amendment Act 2016 (Cth).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from