ARTICLE · 25 MAY 2021

Fact Sheet – Superannuation

Carroll & O'Dea

Explore more from Carroll & O'Dea

Do you know what happens to your superannuation member benefits after you die?

AustraliaFamily and Matrimonial

Josephine Heesh

Author LinkedIn connections

Why you need to have a closer look at your superannuation member benefits – who will receive this on your death?

First some relevant terms:

Member Benefits are the superannuation fund benefits you are entitled to under the SIS Law and the rules of the Super Fund which accumulate from the money compulsorily paid by your employer while you are working and any money that you pay into your Super Fund under the SIS Law as well as investment growth from those funds;
SIS Law means the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 and the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994;
Death Benefits are Member Benefits payable by your superannuation fund arising on your death while a member of the fund; and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Related Articles

When Is A Party Taken To Be Joined To VCAT Proceedings? The Peril Of Delay In Joinder Applications

AustraliaFamily and Matrimonial

The Silent Theft - Fraud And Elder Financial Abuse

AustraliaFamily and Matrimonial

Bartier Perry Solicitors

Non-Agency Child Support In Australia: What Counts And How To Claim It

AustraliaFamily and Matrimonial

Coleman Greig Lawyers

Understanding Special Disability Trusts: A Guide For Families

AustraliaFamily and Matrimonial

Coleman Greig Lawyers

When One Child Farms And The Others Do Not

AustraliaFamily and Matrimonial

HHG Legal Group

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Family and Matrimonial
- Wills/ Intestacy/ Estate Planning

Related Comparative Guides

Comparative Guide

Family Law

See more popular content from

Family and MatrimonialCarroll & O'Dea

How much does a family lawyer make in Australia?

Article dives into the financial aspects of being a family lawyer in Australia.

AustraliaFamily and Matrimonial

Unified Lawyers

When Does A Relationship Become A De Facto Relationship?

Understanding when a relationship becomes legally recognised as de facto in Australia is more complex than many believe. This article examines the legal framework under the Family Law Act 1975, exploring how courts assess relationships of varying durations and what factors truly determine de facto status beyond the commonly misunderstood two-year threshold.

AustraliaFamily and Matrimonial

Bartier Perry Solicitors

Father Custody Rights Australia: Can He Take The Child?

When no parenting orders exist in Australia, both parents hold equal legal authority over their child under section 61C of the Family Law Act 1975. However, the 2024 legislative changes have fundamentally...

AustraliaFamily and Matrimonial

Unified Lawyers

Can A Beneficiary Be An Executor Of A Will In Australia?

There's nothing in Australian law that disqualifies a beneficiary from being an executor of a Will.

AustraliaFamily and Matrimonial

When A Signed Will Is Not Enough: What A Recent Supreme Court Decision Says About Online Estate Planning.

A NSW Supreme Court decision reveals that even a properly signed and professionally drafted Will can fail if the process doesn't adequately establish that the document reflects the testator's true intentions. The case examines the critical distinction between document preparation and comprehensive estate planning, particularly relevant as online Will services become increasingly common.

AustraliaFamily and Matrimonial

HHG Legal Group

Shared care after separation - is 50/50 a right?

Separating parents often ask whether they have a right to equal, week-about care of their children, but Australian family law does not work that way. This article examines when shared care arrangements succeed, how courts now assess applications for equal time following major 2024 reforms, and why no parent can claim a legal entitlement to a 50/50 split.

AustraliaFamily and Matrimonial

Bartier Perry Solicitors

Constructive Trusts And Property Disputes

Equity is a powerful tool in the hands of a party to a family property dispute. This paper will examine the circumstances in which the courts will find the existence of constructive trusts or other equitable rights, how they will enforce them, and the effectiveness of this route in meeting the client's requirements.

AustraliaFamily and Matrimonial

Featured on - Beanstalk Mums: How to get a divorce if you cannot find your ex

This article from "Beanstalk Mums", discusses the divorce process if you cannot find your ex-spouse.

AustraliaFamily and Matrimonial

Exclusive Occupation of Family Home after Separation

Separating from a partner is hard enough without also having to work out who’s staying in the family home. Some couples manage to keep living under the same roof for a while after separating, but that’s not always realistic, especially where things have turned hostile or there’s a risk of family violence.

AustraliaFamily and Matrimonial

Coleman Greig Lawyers

Private Client Comparative Guide

Private Client Comparative Guide for the jurisdiction of Australia, check out our comparative guides section to compare across multiple countries

AustraliaFamily and Matrimonial

Kalus Kenny Intelex

Long Service Entitlements In NSW

After five years of continuous service in New South Wales, employees may qualify for pro rata long service leave payments under specific circumstances—even before reaching the standard 10-year threshold. Understanding when these entitlements arise, particularly in cases of illness, incapacity, or pressing necessity, can significantly impact both employees facing career transitions and employers managing termination obligations.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

Carroll & O'Dea

Injured While Working As A Delivery Driver? New Protections For Gig Workers.

New minimum standards effective from 17 August 2026 introduce personal accident insurance requirements for delivery drivers and riders working through digital platforms like Uber Eats and Deliveroo. These protections address a critical gap for gig economy workers who, as independent contractors, have historically fallen outside traditional workers compensation schemes when injured on the job.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

Carroll & O'Dea

AI Glasses And Privacy: Are Our Laws Keeping Up?

Australia's new statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy, which commenced in June 2025, is being tested against emerging AI-powered smart glasses technology that can record audio and video discreetly. As these devices become more sophisticated and less detectable, questions arise about whether current privacy laws adequately protect individuals from covert surveillance and data collection in both public and private settings.

AustraliaPrivacy

Carroll & O'Dea

Negligence and the scope of liability (legal causation)

Proving negligence and legal causation is not as straight forward as the commonly accepted concepts and definitions.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Carroll & O'Dea

2026 Tour De France: Anti-Doping Polices And Enforcement In The Spotlight

The 2026 Tour de France sparked unprecedented controversy when top competitors Jonas Vingegaard and Tadej Pogacar underwent overnight anti-doping tests on the eve of a crucial stage, raising questions about testing protocols and athlete rights. Following Vingegaard's race-ending crash the next day, the cycling world debated whether the disruptive testing procedures violated established standards and contributed to the incident. This examination explores the complex hierarchy of anti-doping authority, the le

FranceMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Carroll & O'Dea

When A Genuine Redundancy Leads To An Unfair Dismissal Claim

A recent Full Bench decision confirms that employers cannot rely on genuine business reasons alone to justify redundancy dismissals. Even when workforce reductions are commercially necessary, failure to conduct meaningful consultation with affected employees can result in unfair dismissal findings and substantial compensation awards, regardless of business size.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

Carroll & O'Dea

Understanding Failure To Diagnose In Reid v Hanafi [2026] TASSC 46

The Supreme Court of Tasmania examined whether a general practitioner breached her duty of care by failing to diagnose or refer for investigation symptoms that were later identified as multiple sclerosis. The case explores the challenge of identifying serious neurological disease when symptoms present gradually over time and appear non-specific, while reinforcing that medical standards are assessed based on information available at the time rather than hindsight.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Carroll & O'Dea

Understanding Exempt Workers Under NSW Workers Compensation Law

In New South Wales, most injured workers are subject to the Workers Compensation Act 1987 and the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998, including recent legislative reforms introduced through the Workers Compensation Legislation Amendment Act 2025 and the Workers Compensation Legislation Amendment (Reform and Modernisation) Act 2026.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

Carroll & O'Dea

High Court Rejects Novel Commonwealth Defence To Unlawful Immigration Detention

In Abdel-Hady v Commonwealth of Australia [2026] HCA 17, the High Court unanimously rejected a novel defence advanced by the Commonwealth to a claim for false imprisonment arising from immigration detention later...

AustraliaImmigration

Carroll & O'Dea

Is Saying “I Quit” In The Heat Of The Moment An Effective Resignation?

When an employee says "I quit" during a heated workplace exchange, does it constitute a legally binding resignation? A recent Fair Work Commission decision examines the critical distinction between emotional outbursts and genuine resignations, highlighting the employer's duty to clarify an employee's true intentions before treating such statements as final.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

Carroll & O'Dea