Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 OCTOBER 2019

Where next for New Acland coal mine Stage 3 expansion project?

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

The Land Court's decision was ruled invalid because of apprehended bias, so New Acland faces another lengthy hearing.

AustraliaEnergy and Natural Resources

The Queensland Court of Appeal has set aside the decisions of the Land Court and the Supreme Court with respect to Stage 3 of the New Acland coal mine in the Darling Downs.1

In this article, we consider this decision and its implications for the project proponent.

Background

In 2017, the Land Court recommended refusal of the Stage 3 expansion to the New Acland coal mine. The Supreme Court overturned that decision, requiring the Land Court's recommendation be remade, but held that the parties were bound by the findings and conclusions of fact at first instance.

You can read our summaries of the Land Court's decision here and the Supreme Court's decision here.

The Court of Appeal's decision

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    Lawyers Weekly Law firm of the year 2021                  
Employer of Choice for Gender Equality (WGEA)

See more popular content from