Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 AUGUST 2017

High Court decision could render some WA mining leases invalid

The failure to lodge a mineralisation report at the time of an application for a mining lease rendered the lease invalid.

AustraliaEnergy and Natural Resources

What's happened?

Yesterday, the High Court, in Forrest & Forrest Pty Ltd v Wilson [2017] HCA 30, cast doubt on the validity of certain Western Australian mining leases.

The key issue in the case was whether the failure to lodge a mineralisation report, at the time of the application for a mining lease under the Mining Act 1978 (WA), deprived the Mining Warden of jurisdiction to make a recommendation to the Minister for Mines in relation to the grant of the mining lease. It was submitted by Forrest & Forrest that, if such jurisdiction was lacking, any mining lease subsequently granted would be invalid.

Relevant background

On 28 July 2011, Yarri Mining Pty Ltd and Onslow Resources Ltd lodged applications for two mining leases. No mineralisation report was lodged contemporaneously with these applications as required by section 74(1)(ca) of the Act. Several months after the applications were lodged (but prior to the Mining Warden's consideration of the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from