Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 DECEMBER 2016

Work incapacity not simply a matter of physical capacity

This decision confirms what factors are to be taken into account to conclude whether a worker has current work capacity.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

The Court of Appeal has clarified the definition of "no current work capacity" in the case of Richter v Driscoll [2016] VSCA 142, for the purposes of assessing a worker's entitlement to weekly payments of compensation beyond the expiration of the second entitlement period.

The Court of Appeal's decision reinforces that, in determining whether a worker has a "current work capacity", it is not sufficient to find that they have a physical capacity for the tasks required in a particular role羊egard must also be given to the worker's personal circumstances, including their age, education and employment history, location, and the length of any period of time out of the workforce.

Background

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from