Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 DECEMBER 2016

WHS charge dismissed on knockout point

The decision reaffirms the strict application of legal principles of interpretation and pleading in the WHS jurisdiction.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

The District Court of NSW has ordered that a WHS charge be dismissed and costs paid by SafeWork NSW, as the Prosecutor, after it was determined the charge was "inappropriate to the circumstances". The decision of SafeWork NSW v Rawson Homes Pty Ltd [2016] NSWDC 237 has clarified the interpretation of s 19 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW) (the Act).

Sparke Helmore acted for Rawson Homes, the principal contractor for a residential construction site in Orange, NSW. Rawson engaged a specialist contractor, Regal Concreting, to facilitate and pour the concrete slab for the house, and Regal sub-contracted Dagmar for the supply and operation of a concrete boom pump.

On 30 October 2013, the pump was set up by Dagmar and several employees of Regal were performing duties associated with the concrete pour. One of the outrigger support legs on the pump fractured, resulting in the uncontrolled fall of the boom, which hit and injured a Regal employee.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from