Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 OCTOBER 2023

Vicarious liability – where it starts, where it ends, and why defining that point can be difficult

Employees should not assume that their out-of-work conduct will not become a legitimate concern of their employer.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

It has long been a principle "that it is just to make the employer, whose business the employee is carrying out, responsible for injury caused to another by the employee in the course of so acting, rather than to require that the other, innocent, party bear their loss or have only the remedy of suing the individual employee". This is known as vicarious liability.

This principle is reflected in legislation, like the Employees Liability Act 1991 (NSW), confirming employees are not liable if they commit a tort in their employment.

But there are limits to that liability. Under the Employees Liability Act, an employee is not protected, and nor is the employer accountable, if the employee's conduct is serious and wilful misconduct or if it did not occur in the course of, and did not arise out of their employment.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from