Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JANUARY 2025

"Tick And Flick" Gets The Kick: FWC Calls For Proactive Workplace Policy Engagements

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

Businesses cannot rely on a 'tick and flick' strategy to implement policies regarding respectful behaviour and unlawful conduct.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

A recent Fair Work Commission case has sent a clear message to businesses – they cannot rely on a 'tick and flick' strategy to implement policies regarding respectful behaviour and unlawful conduct in the workplace.

The decision reminds employers to be proactive, rather than reactive, when taking steps to prevent unlawful conduct from occurring in the workplace or in connection to work, in line with their legal obligations under the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth).

Samad v Phosphate

In Samad v Phosphate Resources Ltd (t/a Christmas Island Phosphates) [2024] FWC 2868 (Samad v Phosphate), a truck driver was dismissed by his employer for 'serious misconduct' after making inappropriate comments and sexual gestures to, and about, another employee, which then escalated into an aggressive altercation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

This publication does not deal with every important topic or change in law and is not intended to be relied upon as a substitute for legal or other advice that may be relevant to the reader's specific circumstances. If you have found this publication of interest and would like to know more or wish to obtain legal advice relevant to your circumstances please contact one of the named individuals listed.

See more popular content from