Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 FEBRUARY 2011

Summary of dismissal decisions

On 15 April 2008, the applicant was employed as a fish filleter by the respondent, a small business with less than 15 staff. He was terminated on the basis of redundancy, while on holidays in January 2010.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

Mr Francesco Di Masi v Coastal Fisheries Pty Ltd ATFT Sea Empire Unit Trust (U2010/5316) – Commissioner Williams, Perth

20 August 2010

Lack of consultation with employee not preventative of finding of genuine redundancy

On 15 April 2008, the applicant was employed as a fish filleter by the respondent, a small business with less than 15 staff. He was terminated on the basis of redundancy, while on holidays in January 2010.

The Seafood Processing Award 2010 required the company to consult with the worker on his redundancy, which had not occurred.

Commissioner Williams accepted the respondent's evidence that it no longer required the job to be fulfilled because of a genuine change in the company's operational requirements, including the loss of a client and the profitability of the filleting work. Although the required consultation did not occur, it was accepted that in this instance, it would not have changed the outcome, such that the applicant's claim

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from