Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 OCTOBER 2011

Specifics of sexual misconduct - Dismissal fair despite failure to explain specifics

FWA case considered whether failure to notify employee of sexual misconduct allegations rendered his dismissal unfair.

AustraliaEmployment and HR
David Kew (Previously With Kott Gunning)
David Kew (Previously With Kott Gunning)
Author LinkedIn connections

FWA in Perth recently had to decide whether an employer's failure to notify an employee of specific allegations of sexual misconduct rendered his dismissal unfair.

In the case of James Pritchard v Timberglen Pty Ltd T/A Mindarie Marina, the Applicant, Pritchard, argued that he was denied the opportunity to respond to allegations against him which ultimately led to his dismissal. The Respondent claimed that the Applicant had been warned about similar conduct in the past and that dismissal was necessary to avoid the risk of them being held vicariously liable for his conduct.

As employers will be well aware, the rules of natural justice ordinarily require that accusations of misconduct should be put to the person concerned and they should be allowed the opportunity to respond. In this case, the Respondent called five female witnesses at the hearing, who gave evidence of the Applicant's behaviour towards them.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from