Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 SEPTEMBER 2015

Safety more important than privacy in high risk industries

Cooper Grace Ward
Cooper Grace Ward
Contributor
Cooper Grace Ward

Cooper Grace Ward

Cooper Grace Ward was established in 1980 and has quickly become one of the largest independent...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cooper Grace Ward

It was not unjust or unreasonable for the employer to implement a random drug testing scheme using both saliva and urine.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

In a decision released by the Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission this week (Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union – Construction and General Division v Port Kembla Coal Terminal Limited [2015] FWCFB 4075), the last word was had on the argument between the CFMEU and Port Kembla Coal Terminal Ltd with regard to the employer's intention to introduce mixed and random drug testing in the workplace. The decision will hearten employers in high risk industries.

In July 2014, after consultation with the Union, the employer announced that it would be introducing the Alcohol and Other Drug Standard, requiring employees to undertake random urine and saliva tests to ensure they were free of drugs and alcohol at work. The Union filed a dispute in the Fair Work Commission claiming the use of urine tests illegitimately interfered with the privacy of workers and identified historical drug use that didn't affect an employee's work capacity on the day.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from