Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JUNE 2016

Return to work rules not overridden by the Fair Work Act

Employers must show that the costs, inconvenience and disruption of return to work obligations are also unreasonable.

AustraliaEmployment and HR
Laura Forman
Laura Forman
Jessica Tinsley (Formerly With Clayton Utz)
Jessica Tinsley (Formerly With Clayton Utz)
Author LinkedIn connections

Key Points:

An employer can't just show compliance with return to work obligations leads to cost, inconvenience and disruption - it must also be unreasonable.

In rejecting a constitutional challenge to South Australia's new Return to Work legislation a tribunal has upheld its statutory power to order employers to reinstate injured workers who have been improperly dismissed, reminding employers that return to work obligations may result in some cost and inconvenience.

The worker is injured at work

In Walmsley v Crown Equipment Pty Ltd a field service technician employed by Crown Equipment Pty Ltd was dismissed after several workplace injuries left him unable to perform the inherent requirements of his role.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from