Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 AUGUST 2011

How do courts enforce restraint of trade clauses?

A look at a recent NSW court decision on restraint of trade clauses.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

In Brief

Following on from our earlier article regarding Preserving your business through restraint of trade clauses, the New South Wales Supreme Court has recently handed down a decision which provides valuable insight into the approach that the judiciary takes to enforcing restraint of trade clauses.

Seven Network (Operations) Ltd 7 ors v James Warburton (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 386

James Warburton, a highly skilled and talented television executive, was employed by the Seven Network [Seven] as the Chief Sales & Digital Officer under a fixed term contract due to expire on 14 October 2011.

Mr Warburton was considered the natural successor as Chief Executive Officer of Seven but seized an opportunity to become the Chief Executive Officer at Network 10 with a commencement date of 14 July 2011. Having accepted this offer on 2 March 2011 and communicated the situation to Seven, they reacted by requiring Mr Warburton to leave their premises and sought to enforce a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from