Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 AUGUST 2025

High Court ruling reshapes redundancy considerations for employers

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

Redeployment opportunities in the context of redundancy are not only confined to vacant roles.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

In a landmark decision, the High Court has found that redeployment opportunities in the context of redundancy are not only confined to vacant roles. Rather, an employer has a broad obligation to consider whether changes can be made to its current workforce to create or make available a position for an employee in a redundant role to avoid retrenchment.

The decision in Helensburgh Coal Pty Ltd v Bartley [2025] HCA 29provides clarity on the different approaches taken by courts and the Fair Work Commission (FWC) regarding the question of when it would have been reasonable to redeploy an employee to a vacant role.

Employers are continually looking at opportunities to restructure their operations to support business growth and sustainable operations. For those considering restructures in future, we unpack the High Court's decision and its implications on workforce planning.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

This publication does not deal with every important topic or change in law and is not intended to be relied upon as a substitute for legal or other advice that may be relevant to the reader's specific circumstances. If you have found this publication of interest and would like to know more or wish to obtain legal advice relevant to your circumstances please contact one of the named individuals listed.

See more popular content from