Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 SEPTEMBER 2012

High Court - Barclay decision - adverse action

Bendigo TAFE was successful in arguing that the reason for suspension was not his AEU membership or industrial activity.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

The High Court of Australia unanimously determined that the first instance decision of Justice Tracey in the Federal Court of Australia was the correct one, thereby overturning the decision of the Full Bench of the Federal Court.

Mr Barclay was an Australia Educational Union (AEU) representative in his workplace, Bendigo Regional Institute of Technical and Further Education (Bendigo TAFE). Several AEU members had expressed concerns about false and fraudulent documents being prepared at the Bendigo TAFE. These members informed Mr Barclay they did not wish any further action to be taken or their names disclosed.

After a number of different such complaints made by employees to Mr Barclay, he sent an email to AEU members at Bendigo Tafe advising that some members had made such claims and that if an employee was feeling pressured they could contact the AEU for support and advice. This email came to the attention of Management of Bendigo TAFE.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from