Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JULY 2012

Far reaching risks from workplace 'pranks'

Prosecuted employees included individuals who did not take part in the prank but who also did nothing to intervene.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

Employees don't have to be the instigator or actively involved in a workplace 'prank' in order to face personal penalties for breach of work health and safety (WHS) obligations.

In the recent case of Inspector Estreich v Zaccardeli and Others1 the NSW Industrial Relations Commission found a number of employees guilty of offences under the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 (NSW) following a workplace 'prank' which resulted in an employee suffering injuries. The prosecuted employees included individuals who did not take part in the prank but who also did nothing to intervene.

The victim of the prank, Mr Catanzaro, was due to be married the following day. Mr Zaccardelli was the most senior employee on site and the instigator of the incident. During the 'prank', Mr Zaccardelli hit Mr Catanzaro in the groin, tied him to a piece of steel mesh by his hands and legs, threw eggs at him, cut his clothes off, poured fuel in a semi circle in front of Mr Catanzaro and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from