Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 MAY 2017

Employers can avoid opening the floodgates on reasonable administrative action

Lim gives applicants a better grounding in bringing a claim, but employers should not panic about a flood of old cases.

AustraliaEmployment and HR
Lauren Haywood
Lauren Haywood
Ashleigh Buckland (Formerly With Clayton Utz)
Ashleigh Buckland (Formerly With Clayton Utz)
Author LinkedIn connections

While Lim certainly gives applicants a better grounding in bringing a claim, employers should not panic about the flood gates opening on old cases.

In 2005, Hart v Comcare [2005] FCAFC 16 set the causal standard for defending liability for workers' compensation claims under reasonable administrative action. Hart stands for the authority that, if an employee's injury has multiple causes, then only one of those causes needs to satisfy the exclusionary principle that an employee's injury was suffered "as a result of" reasonable disciplinary action.

This principle also extends to situations where the employee failed to obtain a promotion, transfer or benefit in connection with his or her employment. This principle is taken from section 5A(1) of the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) (SRC Act).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from