Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 SEPTEMBER 2025

Employees over contractors: the redeployment preference?

Under the FW Act, a dismissal will not be unfair if the dismissal is a case of genuine redundancy.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

"There has ... been a significant rebalance in favour of employees since the enactment of the" Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), the High Court of Australia said in a recent decision examining the obligation on employers to explore redeployment: Helensburgh Coal Pty Ltd v Bartley [2025] HCA 29 (6 August 2025).

Under the FW Act, a dismissal will not be unfair if the dismissal is a case of genuine redundancy. An element of what comprises a genuine redundancy is that there are no reasonable redeployment opportunities.

It is not uncommon for employers to explore redeployment opportunities by examining the vacancy list. It is also not uncommon for unions to argue that an employer should cease to engage contractors in preference for keeping employees employed in the business. Companies initiate restructures to address financial imperatives so they are often not too keen to cease the engagement of cheaper and skilled labour alternatives.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from