Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 FEBRUARY 2011

Derogatory comments about colostomy bag found to be direct discrimination

A recent case has found that a comment relating to the physical manifestation of a disability can be used to infer direct discrimination on the basis of that disability.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

Maxworthy v Shaw [2010] FMCA 1014

A recent case has found that a comment relating to the physical manifestation of a disability can be used to infer direct discrimination on the basis of that disability.

The applicant, who was a single mother of four was originally employed by the Taree Lunch Spot in June 2007 to work three hours per day, two days per week starting at 11:30am. She also had a second part time job working at an aged care facility. She suffered from Chron's disease and as a result, had to wear a colostomy bag. In October 2007, new owners took over the shop and they continued the applicant's employment.

In spite of the applicant's family responsibilities and despite her objections, the new owners substantially increased her hours and put pressure on her to expand mobile sales. As the applicant stated that she could not work those hours because of her family responsibilities, the owners of the business indicated that they would get a second person to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from