Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 MAY 2017

Court determination first, when facts and credibility remain in issue

It was considered more appropriate for questions of fact and issues of credibility to be determined by a Court.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

The County Court of Victoria recently rejected an employer's application for medical questions to be referred to the Medical Panel, as it was more appropriate for questions of fact and issues of credibility to be determined by a Court.

In Sarac v Ozdemir Holdings Pty Ltd (Ruling) [2016] VCC 1985, the County Court deliberated on whether a worker was seriously injured. The worker had sustained injuries to the right shoulder and lower back as well as a severe psychological condition. The employer made an application to refer questions to the Medical Panel, but the worker objected on the basis that it would constitute an abuse of process and/or that the Medical Panel's opinion would depend on the resolution of factual issues, more appropriately determined by a Court. According to the worker, the issues were:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from