Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 MAY 2009

Common Sense For Contracts

CGU Insurance Limited v Corrections Corporation of Australia Staff Superannuation Pty Ltd [2008] FCAFC 173 considered the interpretation of a ‘Notification of Claims Circumstances’ clause.

AustraliaEmployment and HR
Marcus Saw
Marcus Saw

CGU Insurance Limited v Corrections Corporation of Australia Staff Superannuation Pty Ltd [2008] FCAFC 173 considered the interpretation of a 'Notification of Claims Circumstances' clause. The case examined an insured's awareness of facts and circumstances during the policy period for a claim that was made after the expiry of the policy period and whether the insured was entitled to rely on the clause. The Full Court of the Federal Court held that it was.

Facts

The Corrections Corporation of Australia Staff Superannuation Pty Ltd (CCAS) was the trustee of a superannuation fund (fund) maintained for employees of Australian Integration Management Services Pty Ltd (AIMS). AIMS operated state prisons under contracts with state governments. Due to what was described by the primary judge as the 'liquidity crisis of the fund', a number of damages claims were made against CCAS and its directors for breach of duty as well as against AIMS, by AIMS employees.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from