Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 AUGUST 2017

Assumptions of fact deemed insufficient to invoke willful and false misrepresentation exclusion

Evidence must establish that the misrepresentation was wilfully false and made without any belief that it was true.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

JXTZ and Comcare [2017] AATA 880

Key Points

  • The Tribunal was required to consider whether the exclusion in section 7(7) of the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) (SRC Act) operated in the circumstances.
  • The Tribunal determined that the evidence did not establish, on the balance of probabilities, that there had been a false and wilful misrepresentation of a medical history of anxiety and depression, therefore the exclusion did not apply.

Background

JXTX had a history of being sexually abused as a child and experienced related mental health problems in her youth which included a period of hospitalisation for a major depressive episode.

She submitted a claim for workers' compensation in respect of "psychological and physical stress" sustained during the course of her employment as a Registered Nurse with ACT Health.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from