Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JULY 2017

Asbestos case notes

Not many cases run to judgment in the Dust Diseases Tribunal, but these recent decisions relate to interest and damages.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

Not many cases run to judgment in the Dust Diseases Tribunal. However, in recent weeks there have been two decisions, one of which lays down what could be regarded as new guidelines in relation to the payment of interest, while the other one of which again addresses the difficult issue of general damages for mesothelioma.

Repayment of interest when challenging a CAD

In Jaron Holdings Pty Limited v Amaca Pty Limited [2017] NSWDDT 4, the plaintiff, Robert Hall, sued Jaron Holdings, which settled Mr Hall's claim for $1,385,000 inclusive of costs.

Jaron then brought proceedings for contribution against Amaca. The recovery claim duly proceeded to a contributions assessment determination ("CAD"), which allocated 47.1% to Jaron and 52.9% to Amaca. Amaca duly paid Jaron 52.9% of the original settlement, simultaneously advising Jaron that it intended to contest the CAD.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from