Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 MAY 2013

Adverse Action: Director and Manager Properly Named and Liable

The Fair Work Act protects employees when making a complaint or inquiry to their employer regarding their employment.

AustraliaEmployment and HR
Josephine Hart (Previously With Kott Gunning)
Josephine Hart (Previously With Kott Gunning)
Author LinkedIn connections

In Devonshire v Magellan Powertronics Pty Ltd & ORS, Ms Devonshire had been employed as a Business Development Manager by Magellan for less than three months before being dismissed.

She claimed that her dismissal amounted to adverse action by the company as a result of her exercising a "workplace right", namely asserting that she had been underpaid and had been denied her agreed car and mobile phone allowances. The Fair Work Act specifically protects employees who make a complaint or inquiry to their employer regarding their employment.

In upholding her complaint, the Federal Magistrates' Court decided that "a complaint or inquiry" to the employer about issues in the workplace included both Magellan's Director and the General Manager (to whom Ms Devonshire would report her daily activities). Both fell within the relevant "class of persons to whom a complaint or inquiry may be made" and therefore could not be removed as named Respondents in the action.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from