Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 MARCH 2024

Ruby Princess class action waiver clauses unfair

Looks at the Judgment finding the class action waiver clause as unfair terms under ACL & potential implications moving forward.

AustraliaCorporate/Commercial Law

A unanimous bench of the High Court of Australia in Karpik v Carnival Plc [2023] HCA 39 has found the class action waiver clause relied upon in the Ruby Princess class action are unfair terms under Australian Consumer Law (ACL). This article looks at the Judgment and potential implications moving forward.

Background

In March 2020 there was mass infection of COVID-19 of passengers onboard the Ruby Princess cruise ship during its round-trip voyage from Sydney Harbour.

The lead applicant, Ms Karpik, commenced a class action in the Federal Court of Australia on behalf of 2,651 passengers against the global cruise operator and its Australian subsidiary (Princess) for losses allegedly suffered by the passengers and their relatives.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from