The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Slater and Gordon

Work 029 2192 1818
Fax 029 2192 1888

Wales: Crime, fraud and licensing

Crime: general
Crime: general - ranked: tier 3

Slater and Gordon

The 'empathetic and knowledgeable' team at Slater and Gordon is primarily focused on representing police officers facing criminal investigations and misconduct proceedings. Benefiting from an 'encyclopaedic knowledge of the law of police misconduct together with his extensive experience of the high level crime', Ian Wilson is a leader in the field whose work has recently included a high-profile matter successfully defending a police officer accused of misusing her taser. Associate Jon Nutman  is also recommended.

Practice head(s):Ian Wilson

Other key lawyers:Jon Nutman

Key Clients

Jan Kingshott

Claire Boddie

Work highlights

  • The firm represented Acting Sergeant Claire Boddie who was prosecuted in relation to taser misuse. The officer was acquitted at court but she was still required to attend a misconduct hearing, where the allegations were unproven.
  • The firm successfully defended a Devon & Cornwall police sergeant who was prosecuted for gross negligence manslaughter following the death of an individual who was taken into custody when he was the custody sergeant on duty.

[back to top]

Wales: Human resources

Employment - ranked: tier 2

Slater and Gordon

Slater and Gordon's 11-strong team provides an 'impressively knowledgeable service' to an exclusively claimant-side client base, which includes senior executives, private clients, trade unions and the Police Federation. 'Excellent' senior associate Juliette Franklin is now one of the most experienced members of the team following Rachel Harfield's recent move to the Cardiff and District Law Society, and is particularly noted for her skill in representing clients in discrimination claims. Senior solicitor Mohini Bharani is 'very compassionate' when representing clients in race and disability discrimination cases.

Practice head(s):Juliette Franklin 

Other key lawyers:James Watkins; Claire Tait; Rhydian Reeves; Mohini Bharani


'The sensible and commercial Juliette Franklin has an excellent reputation.'

Key Clients

Police Federation of England and Wales

Unite the Union







Work highlights

  • Successfully represented Angus Bowler in a long-running racial discrimination and victimisation case brought against Kent Police.
  • We are acting for a transgender police officer in a claim for sexual orientation discrimination.
Next Generation Partners

Juliette Franklin  - Slater and Gordon

Rising stars

Mohini Bharani  - Slater and Gordon

[back to top]

Wales: Insurance

Clinical negligence: claimant
Clinical negligence: claimant - ranked: tier 2

Slater and Gordon

Slater and Gordon is able to call upon the expertise of a large number of 'excellent lawyers' at varying levels of experience, across the full spectrum of claimant clinical negligence cases, including those of the utmost severity. As well as the firm's litigation expertise, it is also provides a holistic service through the life-cycle of a case by virtue of its national client liaison team, specialist Court of Protection offering and independent financial planning company. Team head Yvonne Agnew has extensive experience across all types of clinical negligence cases, particularly in relation to high-value and complex birth injury, brain and spinal/vascular injury claims. Praised for his 'skill and sensitivity', senior associate Luq Ali is head of fixed fees for clinical negligence claims in Cardiff.

Practice head(s):Yvonne Agnew

Other key lawyers:Luq Ali; Julia Reynolds; Lara Bennett; Kelly Lloyd Davies


'Luq Ali has a very busy case load with many complex and high-value cases.'

'Lara Bennett handles complex and high-value cases with excellent skill.'


Work highlights

  • The firm achieved an excellent settlement for a claimant who underwent an above knee amputation.
  • The team is acting for the claimant in a sensitive misdiagnosis case.
  • The team is acting for the claimant who suffered complications as a result of a delay in diagnosis and treatment of Cauda Equina Syndrome.
  • The team successfully acted for a claimant who suffered significant loss of vision as a result of a delay in referring for specialist ophthalmic treatment.
Leading individuals

Yvonne Agnew - Slater and Gordon

Rising stars

Luq Ali  - Slater and Gordon

[back to top]

Personal injury: claimant
Personal injury: claimant - ranked: tier 2

Slater and Gordon

Slater and Gordon has a strong reputation among private individuals, as well as for members of numerous trade unions, across a wide range of personal injury claims, ranging from RTA and employers' liability through to serious industrial disease. Clients also benefit from various ancillary services, including a Court of Protection offering and a client liaison and welfare benefits adviser. John Browne has 'in-depth knowledge' in relation to industrial disease-related claims, and Nicholas Collins has vast experience dealing with workplace injuries, particularly within heavy industry environments. The 'empathetic and sensitive' Julian Cason excels at handling asbestos-related matters.

Practice head(s):John Browne (Head of Cardiff Industrial Disease Team) and Andrew Owen (Head of Cardiff Personal Injury Team)

Other key lawyers:Nicholas Collins; Michael Jenkins; Julian Cason


'Vastly experienced and resourced personal injury team with a long history of fighting for claimants.'

'Impressive breadth of knowledge.'

'The experienced Nicholas Collins has a good tactical approach to complex claims.'

'John Browne is a canny litigator who has a wealth of experience in dealing with asbestos litigation and always seems to be one-step ahead of the opposition.'

'Julian Cason has an excellent manner in dealing with people in very difficult circumstances.'

Leading individuals

John Browne - Slater and Gordon

Nicholas Collins - Slater and Gordon

Next Generation Partners

Julian Cason - Slater and Gordon

[back to top]

Legal Developments by:
Slater and Gordon

  • FSA enforcement and lessons from Galleon

    Hot on the heels of securing convictions and a custodial sentence for insider dealing in R v McQuoid [2009], further signs of the Financial Services Authority (FSA)’s renewed vigour for combating market abuse continue to emerge.
    - Russell Jones & Walker

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‚Äėcentre of life test‚Äô in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of¬† ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan ¬† [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the ‚ÄúRegulations‚ÄĚ). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess ¬†Surinder Singh ¬†cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a¬† sole representative visa ¬†is not ‚Äúa¬† majority shareholder in the overseas business‚ÄĚ.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has ¬†‚Äėpreviously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules‚Äô,¬† the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11).¬†
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (‚Äúthe 2014 Act‚ÄĚ) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal.¬†The¬† explanatory notes ¬†to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the¬† Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ¬†(‚Äúthe 2002 Act‚ÄĚ). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.