Every year, millions of cases are filed with the courts. Last year their number was over 5 million, which indicates a large number of people who are forced to defend their rights in court. In such cases, seeking professional legal assistance from lawyers is a common practice.

At the same time, the parties to the dispute have a natural question: “Why should I have to pay for legal assistance if I am not the one violating rights and interests?”

This is a logical question, and that is why the law provides for the possibility of reimbursement of such expenses in case of a favorable resolution of the case for the party. However, in practice, the procedure for expenses reimbursement  often conceals a number of problems, as courts usually only partially reimburse expenses.

Why is it not always possible to reimburse the costs of legal assistance?

Courts may refuse or reduce the amount of reimbursement based on various factors:

Given the above, most lawyers before taking on a case inform their clients about the risks of the court refusing or reducing the claimed amount of expenses for professional legal assistance. However, practice shows that proper substantiation of the claimed expenses increases the chances of receiving compensation.

Criteria to be considered by the court when deciding on reimbursement

When determining the reasonableness of expenses, the court takes into account:

Not all expenses will be recognized by the court as necessary. For example, the current case law shows that courts do not recognize as legal assistance the meetings of an attorney with a client, coordination of procedural documents, the time spent by an attorney for travelling to court, the preparation of an application for recovery of expenses for professional legal assistance, etc. In other words, the court may deduct the specified scope of work and services of a lawyer from the amount of legal fees claimed by a party.

How to avoid a reduction in compensation?

In order to avoid a reduction in the  compensation amount , it is necessary to:

The court pays particular attention to the behavior of the parties during the proceedings. If one party has delayed the proceedings, filed unfounded motions or deliberately complicated the process, this may affect the decision on the compensation of costs.

The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that reimbursement of legal assistance costs is not automatic. Even if the court rules in favor of a party, it may partially or completely refuse to reimburse costs.

The European Court of Human Rights also stresses that when determining the amount of compensation, the court must proceed from the following criteria: the reality of the attorney's fees, the reasonableness of their amount, based on the specific circumstances of the case and the financial situation of the parties. This opinion is illustrated, in particular, in the ECHR judgment on the case of East/west Alliance Limited v. Ukraine.

What the amounts for legal assistance are typically awarded  by the court?

As a rule, the courts are reluctant to award amounts exceeding UAH 30,000, although there are always exceptions to the “rules”.

For example, in case No. 910/4881/18, the Supreme Court upheld the decisions of the previous instances and ordered the defendant to reimburse the plaintiff UAH 337,665.08 of legal assistance costs.

In case No. 910/9668/23, the Commercial Court of Kyiv awarded the party the compensation of UAH 100,000.00 out of the UAH 316,000.00 claimed  . The decision was upheld on appeal.

By an additional Ruling of the South-Western Commercial Court of Appeal in case No. 916/1618/20, the court awarded UAH 200,000.00 of legal costs in favor of the applicant.

In case No. 924/866/21, the court of first instance recovered UAH 464,290.85 of professional legal assistance costs in favor of the plaintiff. However, when reviewing such a decision, the North-Western Commercial Court of Appeal reduced this amount to UAH 176,088.48, which remained unchanged after the cassation review.

GOLAW attorneys also received a number of favorable decisions for their clients. In particular, in case No. 910/11809/24, the court decided to compensate the plaintiff UAH 50,000, and in case No. 910/11813/24, the court ordered the defendant to pay UAH 230,850 of professional legal assistance costs.

Conclusions

It is entirely possible to impose the costs of legal assistance to the opposing party but full reimbursement is not guaranteed.

The court assesses the justification, proportionality and actual necessity of the claimed expenses and determines the amount to be recovered based on its own discretion.

Proper documentation and justification significantly increase the chances of a favorable decision.

Case law shows that reimbursements exceeding UAH 30,000 are achievable.

Overall, while courts tend to limit compensation amounts, a careful approach to collecting evidence, properly substantiating  expenses and maintaining a consistent legal strategy can significantly increase the amount of compensation.

Author:

Anastasiia Klian, Counsel of Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice at GOLAW, Attorney at Law