Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

PODCAST · 31 AUGUST 2026

Trade Secret Law Evolution Podcast, Episode 94: The Ninth Circuit Reverses A Massive Verdict And Clarifies The Burden Of Proof

Greenberg Traurig
Greenberg Traurig
Contributor
Greenberg Traurig

Greenberg Traurig

Greenberg Traurig, LLP has approximately 3,200 lawyers across 51 locations in the United States,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Greenberg Traurig

The Ninth Circuit's decision in Comet Technologies USA, Inc. v. XP Power, LLC reversed a $40 million verdict and established critical precedent regarding burden of proof requirements in trade secret cases under the Defend Trade Secrets Act. This episode examines how the appellate court's ruling reshapes expectations for proving trade secret misappropriation and highlights the risks of improper jury instructions when claims are dismissed during trial.

United StatesIntellectual Property
 Jordan D.  Grotzinger
Jordan D. Grotzinger
Gregory S. Bombard
Gregory S. Bombard

You are invited to listen to Episode 94 of Greenberg Traurig’s Trade Secret Law Evolution Podcast, “The Ninth Circuit Reverses a Massive Verdict and Clarifies the Burden of Proof.”

In this episode, Jordan Grotzinger and Greg Bombard unpack the case of Comet Technologies USA, Inc. v. XP Power, LLC, in which the Ninth Circuit reversed a $40 million verdict, clarified the burden of proof in DTSA cases, and provided a cautionary tale about jury instructions when claims are dismissed mid-trial.

self

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from