Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 OCTOBER 2017

BPLA Panel With Judge Young On Reverse Payments After Actavis

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP

At Proskauer, our singular focus is on advising and supporting our clients to achieve their goals...

View firm profile
Explore more from Proskauer Rose LLP

BPLA Panel with Judge Young on Reverse Payments after Actavis.

United StatesIntellectual Property
Author LinkedIn connections

On October 26, the Boston Patent Law Association will host a panel featuring Judge William Young to discuss the legal landscape following the Supreme Court's 2014 opinion in Actavis v. FTC. In that case, the Supreme Court held that large and unexplained payments in the settlement of Hatch-Waxman patent lawsuits may raise antitrust issues. The BPLA panel is expected to discuss these "pay-for-delay" cases and tips for settling Hatch-Waxman litigation. More information about the panel can be found here.

BPLA Panel With Judge Young On Reverse Payments After Actavis

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Tools Of The Trade (Secrets): A Trade Secret Playbook For The Post-Non-Compete World?

In our last post, we covered why building a trade secret management program matters more than blanket confidentiality designations. This post is about what a trade secret program makes possible when someone walks out the door, and why companies without one may be left with employment agreements that cannot do that job alone.
United StatesIntellectual Property
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Article

The Final (?) Word: “Bad Spaniels” Stands

After 12 years of litigation, the Ninth Circuit has finally ruled in the epic trademark dispute between Jack Daniel's and VIP Products over the "Bad Spaniels" dog toy parody. The court's decision establishes crucial new standards for proving dilution by tarnishment, requiring brand owners to demonstrate mark-specific fame and actual reputational harm rather than relying on offensive associations alone.
United StatesIntellectual Property
Marks Gray
Marks Gray
Article

Navigating Training, Improving And Competition Restrictions In Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Agreements

As organizations accelerate their adoption of generative AI, attention is increasingly shifting from the technology itself to the contractual frameworks that govern its use. What may appear to be standard licensing language can have significant implications for how businesses leverage AI tools, incorporate AI-generated content into their operations, and pursue future innovation strategies. This article examines one of the more consequential and evolving aspects of generative AI contracting, highlighting are
United StatesIntellectual Property
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Article

Staying True To The Specification: Federal Circuit Vacates Preliminary Injunction Based On Unsupported Claim Constructions

The Federal Circuit vacated a preliminary injunction in a patent infringement case involving electrical outlet cover products, finding that the district court made critical errors in its claim construction analysis. The appellate court determined that the lower court improperly imposed unsupported limitations on key patent terms and incorrectly applied a presumption of irreparable harm.
United StatesIntellectual Property
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Article

In French Fry Design Patent Battle, District Court Denies Post-Trial Motions And Reinforces The Significance Of Rule 50 Motions

A federal district court in Idaho denied McCain Foods' post-trial motions in a design patent dispute over French fry shapes, upholding a jury verdict that found McCain's "Twisted Potato" willfully infringed Simplot's design patent. The decision reinforces critical procedural requirements for Rule 50 motions and clarifies standards for proving design patent infringement through photographs and marketing materials.
United StatesIntellectual Property
Jeffer Mangels & Mitchell LLP
Jeffer Mangels & Mitchell LLP
Article

Marked For Dismissal: Settlement Licenses Sink NPE’s Pre-Suit Damages

In VDPP, LLC v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., the Federal Circuit addressed whether a non-practicing entity that licenses its patent through settlement agreements must ensure those licensees comply with patent marking requirements under 35 U.S.C. § 287(a). The court's ruling clarifies that patent owners cannot avoid marking obligations simply because they don't manufacture products themselves...
United StatesIntellectual Property
Irwin IP
Irwin IP
Article

Courts Expand The DTSA’s Reach To Foreign Trade Secret Misappropriation Following Motorola v. Hytera

The Seventh Circuit's 2024 decision in Motorola Solutions v. Hytera Communications established that the Defend Trade Secrets Act can reach conduct outside the United States and permit recovery of damages based on worldwide sales. District courts have begun applying this precedent, expanding the potential scope of liability for cross-border trade secret disputes. The ruling raises important questions about how minimal a US connection may be before federal trade secret protection no longer applies.
WorldwideIntellectual Property
Goodwin Procter LLP
Goodwin Procter LLP
Article

The Proof Is In The Priority: Director Squires Addresses Antedating And Prior-Art Qualification

Director Squires issued written opinions in two recent PTAB proceedings examining critical threshold questions about prior art qualification. One case explored whether sufficient evidence supported an earlier invention date to antedate prior art, while the other determined if a reference was publicly accessible before the patent's priority date.
United StatesIntellectual Property
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Article

Bowflex Keeps The Weight Of Successor Liability From Landing On The Purchaser

A New Jersey District Court decision demonstrates how carefully drafted sale orders and proper notice procedures in bankruptcy asset sales can effectively shield buyers from legacy product liability claims. The case examines the critical interplay between asset purchase agreements, court-approved sale orders, and constitutional notice requirements in determining whether pre-closing liabilities follow purchased assets or remain with the seller.
United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Article

In the “FRAME” - FCA Proposals to Reform Asset Manager Reporting

The Financial Conduct Authority has released CP26/26, proposing a comprehensive transformation of how UK and third-country alternative asset managers report fund information through a new regime called FRAME (Fund Reporting for Asset Management Entities). The consultation introduces size-based thresholds, revised reporting frequencies, and tailored requirements for different fund categories including hedge funds, private market funds, and third-country managers.
United KingdomFinance and Banking
Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Article

New York Employers May Soon Face New Separation Agreement Procedural Requirements

New York State Legislature has passed a bill that would require employers to provide employees with a minimum 21-day review period and 7-day revocation window for separation agreements involving the release of claims. The proposed "No Severance Ultimatums Act" extends procedural protections similar to those under federal age discrimination law to all covered severance agreements, regardless of employee age, and awaits Governor Hochul's signature.
United StatesEmployment and HR
Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Article

SEC And CFTC Further Extend Compliance Date For 2024 Form PF Amendments

The Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission have announced another extension of the compliance date for Form PF amendments, pushing the deadline from October 2026 to July 2027. This extension comes as the agencies consider proposed amendments that would significantly roll back the 2024 reporting requirements before they take effect. Private fund advisers must continue following existing Form PF reporting frameworks while monitoring these ongoing regulatory developments.
United StatesFinance and Banking
Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Article

New York State Mandates Employee Access To Personnel Records

New York has enacted legislation granting private and public sector employees unprecedented access to their personnel records, including the right to review, dispute, and potentially correct negative information that could impact their employment status. The law, which takes effect in November 2026, establishes strict timelines for employer notification and record access while providing enforcement mechanisms through the State Attorney General.
United StatesEmployment and HR
Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Article

SEC Proposes To Rescind Advisers Act Pay-to-Play Rule (But Don’t Delete Your Policies Yet)

The Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed rescinding the Investment Advisers Act's Pay-to-Play Rule in its entirety, potentially eliminating strict prohibitions on political contributions by investment advisers serving state and local government entities. While this would provide significant relief from the rule's rigid framework and severe penalties for minor violations, advisers must understand that pay-to-play compliance obligations would persist through other federal regulations, state laws....
United StatesFinance and Banking
Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP