Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 SEPTEMBER 2024

Jan Vishwas Act

JSA Advocates & Solicitors
JSA Advocates & Solicitors
Contributor
JSA Advocates & Solicitors

JSA Advocates & Solicitors

Established in 1991 Our services: JSA is a leading law firm in India with more than 600...

View firm profile
Explore more from JSA Advocates & Solicitors

MOCI, <em>vide</em> notification dated July 30, 2024, states that the entries in the JVA with respect to the Copyright Act, 1957, have come into force with effect from August 1, 2024...

IndiaIntellectual Property
Upendra N. Sharma
Upendra N. Sharma
Gaurav Wahie
Gaurav Wahie
Alaparthi Vishal Chowdary
Alaparthi Vishal Chowdary
Author LinkedIn connections

Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023

  1. The Ministry of Commerce and Industry ("MOCI"), vide notification dated July 29, 2024, states that the entries in the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 ("JVA") with respect to the Patents Act, 1970, the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, have come into force with effect from August 1, 2024.
  2. MOCI, vide notification dated July 30, 2024, states that the entries in the JVA with respect to the Copyright Act, 1957, have come into force with effect from August 1, 2024.
  3. The Ministry of Finance, vide notification dated August 1, 2024, states that the entries in the JVA with respect to the Public Debt Act, 1944, have come into force with effect from August 1, 2024.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Supreme Court Clarifies That Compromise Decrees Asserting Pre-existing Rights Are Not Subject To Registration Or Payment Of Stamp Duty

In the recent case of Mukesh vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr., the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India adjudicated on the issue of whether compromise decrees that assert pre-existing rights necessitate registration under the Registration Act, 1908 and are subject to stamp duty under the Indian Stamp Act of 1899.
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
JSA Advocates & Solicitors
JSA Advocates & Solicitors
Article

The Supreme Court Of India Clarifies: Order II Rule 2 Of The Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 Cannot Be A Ground For Rejection Of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11(D) Of The Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908

A two judge bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India (“Supreme Court”) in S. Valliammai and Ors. vs. S. Ramanathan and Anr. recently held that Order II Rule 2, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) cannot constitute a ground for rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC. The Supreme Court drew a critical distinction between the two provisions clarifying that while Order II Rule 2 curtails the right to sue for certain claims or reliefs, but it does not bar filing of a suit under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC.
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
JSA Advocates & Solicitors
JSA Advocates & Solicitors