Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JUNE 2016

Weigel, Druckenbrodt Published In Deutscher AnwaltSpiegel

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

Frankfurt-based Litigation partner Michael Weigel and counsel Alexander Druckenbrodt published an article in Deutscher AnwaltSpiegel, reviewing the German Federal Supreme Court's January 26, 2016 judgement of File No. XI ZR 91/14.

GermanyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Alexander Druckenbrodt
Alexander Druckenbrodt
Michael Weigel
Michael Weigel
Author LinkedIn connections

Frankfurt-based Litigation partner Michael Weigel and counsel Alexander Druckenbrodt published an article in Deutscher AnwaltSpiegel, reviewing the German Federal Supreme Court's January 26, 2016 judgement of File No. XI ZR 91/14.

The article analyzes the decision from the perspectives of both the plaintiffs and the defendants to explore how it dealt with issues of prima facie evidence in the area of electronic funds transfers. According to Weigel and Druckenbrodt, many of these issues, often initially arising from poor lawmaking, have been disputed in judicial literature and jurisprudence and have now been solved by the court. Their article points out weaknesses of the decision, but generally agrees with the court's judgment.

» Read the full article in Deutscher AnwaltSpiegel.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from