International Mediation Guide 2016

A recent English High Court decision confirms that foreign judgments may be enforced even when extraordinary review procedures remain available, provided the judgment presently determines the parties' rights. The case also reinforces that natural justice defences are reserved for genuine procedural unfairness, not disagreements with foreign courts' conclusions. How does this ruling align with the Cayman Islands' established approach to foreign judgment enforcement?

The Grand Court's decision in Thalassa Investments LP examines the boundaries of discovery rights in just and equitable winding up proceedings, particularly when limited partners allege serious misconduct by general partners. This ruling clarifies the strategic considerations limited partners must weigh when choosing between pursuing their statutory right to information under section 22 of the Exempted Limited Partnership Act versus obtaining documents through traditional discovery processes.

A Cayman Islands court decision examines the procedural requirements for obtaining interim injunctive relief in a family property dispute, highlighting critical deficiencies in the application process. The Chief Justice's ruling provides essential guidance on urgency requirements, pleading standards, standing issues, and the adequacy of damages as a remedy in interlocutory proceedings.

Explore the comprehensive legal framework for fraud litigation in the Cayman Islands, including cross-border asset tracing mechanisms, discovery tools, and enforcement strategies. Learn how the jurisdiction's experienced judiciary handles complex international fraud disputes through freezing orders, Norwich Pharmacal applications, and innovative funding arrangements.

The case arose from a joint venture dispute with its origins in a debt-for-equity restructuring. From 2018 onwards, Haitong International Securities Group Limited (Haitong)...

The Grand Court of the Cayman Islands dismissed a US$26 million winding-up petition in a landmark case involving complex cross-border financing and disputed foreign law claims. The decision provides crucial guidance on when courts will refuse to wind up companies where debts are genuinely disputed on substantial grounds, particularly in cases involving foreign law interpretation and expert evidence.

开曼群岛《大法院规则》第24号命令引入新第7A条规则，为诉讼前及非诉讼方证据开示建立成文机制。本文探讨该规则如何填补程序框架中的重大空

The Grand Court of the Cayman Islands has issued a landmark ruling addressing the tension between freedom of information rights and the protection of commercially sensitive third-party property.

The Cayman Islands serves as a premier international financial centre where substantial wealth is structured through various entities, making it a critical jurisdiction for cross-border asset recovery disputes. This comprehensive guide examines the robust legal framework and powerful mechanisms available under Cayman Islands law for parties seeking to trace, preserve, and recover assets across multiple jurisdictions.

As an autonomous British Overseas Territory, the legal framework of the Cayman Islands shares much in common with England and Wales (as well as other common law jurisdictions across the Commonwealth).

The Central Bank of Ireland (the “Central Bank”) has published a thematic assessment report (the “Report”) following a review of the implementation of key aspects of the Fitness and Probity regime (the “F&P Regime”) in the MiFID investment firm sector.

A key operational change to CRS is the new requirement for a Cayman Islands Financial Institution (each an “FI”) to appoint a Principal Point of Contact (“PPoC”) that is resident in the Cayman Islands. Where the PPoC of an FI is not currently resident in the Cayman Islands, the FI is required to appoint a Cayman Islands-based PPoC and notify the Department for International Tax Cooperation (“DITC”) by 31 January 2027.

The Cayman Islands has updated its Common Reporting Standard (“CRS”) framework, and most new requirements came into effect from 1 January 2026. This client update provides an overview of the changes and how the Maples Group can assist.

The Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) occupy a leading position in the global investment funds landscape.

Effective as of 1 January 2026, an update to the Common Reporting Standard, or CRS, requires that financial institutions based in the Cayman Islands have a Principal Point of Contact, or “PPOC”, that has a physical presence within the jurisdiction.

On 24 July 2026, China's Ministry of Finance and State Taxation Administration jointly issued the Announcement on Individual Income Tax Matters Relating to Offshore Trusts (《财政部 税务总局关于离岸信托个人所 得税有关事项的公告》) (Announcement No. 21 of 2026) (the "Notice"), together with a companion Announcement of the State Taxation Administration on Collection and Administration Matters Relating to Individual Income Tax on Offshore Trusts...

The legislative framework governing agency workers in Ireland, the Protection of Employees (Temporary Agency Work) Act 2012 (the “2012 Act”) has been in place for almost 15 years but continues to be an area that generates questions...

The Cayman Islands Government has announced 1 the Cayman Islands has submitted an application to the US National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) for Qualified Jurisdiction Status (“QJS”).

The UK Consumer Composite Investments (“CCI”) regime introduces a new disclosure framework for investment products made available to UK retail investors.

CIMA’s new AML and sanctions Rules introduce enhanced compliance requirements for Cayman Islands regulated entities, including private funds and mutual funds. This guide summarises the key obligations, compliance considerations and action items for CIMA registered funds ahead of the 18 September 2026 implementation date.