Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 NOVEMBER 2012

Insurance And Tort Liability Bulletin (Released On Thursday, November 1, 2012)

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

On October 29, 2012, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld the decision of Herman J. in Martin et al v. Fleming et al, in which she determined that no ambiguity exists in s. 267.5(7) of the Insurance Act, which deals with the application of statutory deductibles.

CanadaInsurance
Tamara Tomomitsu
Tamara Tomomitsu
M. Christine Fotopoulos
M. Christine Fotopoulos
Author LinkedIn connections

Case update

On October 29, 2012, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld the decision of Herman J. in Martin et al v. Fleming et al, in which she determined that no ambiguity exists in s. 267.5(7) of the Insurance Act, which deals with the application of statutory deductibles. The Court of Appeal confirmed that a protected defendant (or defendants) is entitled to apply from the damages apportioned against it, one deductible per accident notwithstanding the case may involve multiple accidents and/or actions, with a global assessment of damages.

The panel included Justice Rouleau, Justice Sharpe and Justice Hoy.

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from