DLA Piper LLP (US) maintains its reputation as ‘a top choice in the market’, with strong technical and procedural experience with Section 337 actions. With a particular strength in tech, the team recently achieved walk-away defense victories for both NCP Semiconductors and FirePro. Seasoned ITC litigator Erin P. Gibson co-heads the team and is a go-to choice for global tech companies. With great experience at the ITC, fellow co-head Sean Cunningham is a key attorney for technology, medical device and power equipment companies. Helena Kiepura also co-chairs the team and is renowned for her offensive ITC work. The team’s leadership is rounded out by Matthew Satchwell, based in Chicago, and Gina Durham, who practices in San Francisco. In Silicon Valley, Mark Fowler is lead trial counsel for significant technology and medical device companies, such as Samsung and Toshiba. Daniel Valencia further bolsters the team, with clients describing him as an ‘excellent ITC litigator’.
Patents: litigation (International Trade Commission) in United States
DLA Piper LLP (US)
Practice head(s):
Erin P. Gibson; Sean C. Cunningham; Gina Durham; Matthew Satchwell; Helena Kiepura
Other key lawyers:
Daniel Valencia; Mark Fowler; Paul Steadman; Erin McLaughlin; Paulina Starkostka
Testimonials
‘DLA’s ITC group is one of few in the market that can staff a very large case with partners and senior lawyers that have significant ITC experience and ability. DLA also has an excellent patent litigation team to handle pure patent issues, making them a top choice in the market.’
‘I am very familiar with Daniel Valencia’s and Helena Kiepura’s work and experience. Both are excellent ITC litigators. Mark Fowler is an excellent litigator, as is Paul Steadman.’
‘DLA Piper’s ITC team is filled with experienced professionals who are well-versed in the ITC procedural nuances.’
‘Paulina Starostka, an associate at DLA Piper, is an exceptional attorney and I cannot speak highly enough of her. Paulina’s attention to detail is unparalleled, and her work ethic is unmatched. Furthermore, her deep understanding of Section 337 investigations is second to none.’
‘Erin McLaughlin has deep ITC knowledge and experience and I consider her a top subject matter expert in this venue.’
Key clients
Lenovo Group Ltd., Lenovo (United States) Inc.
NXP Semiconductors N.V. and NXP USA Inc.
HP Inc.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Microsoft Corporation
Motorola Mobility, LLC
Dell, Inc.
Honeywell International, Inc.
FirePro Systems Limited
Mazda Motor Corporation
Work highlights
- Represented Lenovo in a first-of-its-kind patent enforcement action in the ITC and Northern District of California against Lenovo competitors ASUSTek Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International.
- Successfully defended FirePro Systems, Ltd.; Halma Holdings LLC; and Halma PLC (collectively, FirePro) against an ITC action seeking to exclude from the United States FirePro’s lifesaving aerosol fire extinguishing devices and the fire extinguishing compositions within them.
- Won a walk-away defense victory for NXP Semiconductors in an ITC case filed by Bell Northern Research (BNR) seeking to exclude NXP’s Wi-Fi chips from the United States.
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
Made up of ‘strong technical lawyers’, Kirkland & Ellis LLP’ trial-ready team is credited for its ‘effective, creative and winning’ strategies before the ITC. The team is well-equipped to represent both claimants and respondents, successfully managing final determinations, appeals, and the enforcement of exclusion orders. Paul Brinkman, in Washington DC, is a key practitioner with a strong track record in competitor vs. competitor disputes before the ITC. Also in Washington DC, Gregg LoCascio and Edward Donovan are seasoned IP litigators with particular strengths in obtaining and defeating exclusion orders. In New York, the ‘highly strategic’ Gregory Arovas represents high-tech clients and is prolific at patent and trade secret litigation. Other notable names in New York include Joseph Loy, whose expertise spans high-technology, biotech and pharma patents, and Todd Friedman, a go-to choice for high-stakes cases for leading technology companies. Additionally, Karthik Ravishankar is skilled in facilitating ITC cases through discovery and trial, and practices in Washington DC.
Other key lawyers:
Paul Brinkman; Gregg LoCascio; Edward Donovan; Gregory Arovas; Joseph Loy; Todd Friedman; Karthik Ravishankar; Brandon Brown
Testimonials
‘Strong technical lawyers for patent litigation. It is a top ITC practice with SEP expertise and large-scale global dispute management. No issues with staffing shortages or resource constraints, senior partners pay close attention and actively manage the case.’
‘Gregory Arovas is a highly strategic and effective communicator with C-suite and judges, gets to the heart of issues quickly, an excellent trial lawyer. Todd Friedman is an excellent trial lawyer, trustworthy, great client liaison who manages cases diligently and budgets accurately.’
‘I can trust the Kirkland & Ellis team to create the most effective, creative and winning strategy. The Kirkland lawyers are incredibly smart, hard-working, and communicative. Their analysis and written work product are exceptional. They frequently try cases and are good at it; this is the team you want on your side.’
‘Todd Friedman, Gregory Arovas and Brandon Brown are excellent trial lawyers and know how to manage a team. They are also so good at pretrial that they often don’t need to try the case -because they win it.’
Key clients
Advanced Bionics
Ascletis Pha-B
Delta Electronics, Inc.
Dyson
Eli Lilly and Company
iFit Health & Fitness Inc.
iRobot Corporation
Lenovo, Inc.
Samsara Inc.
Latham & Watkins LLP
Latham & Watkins LLP maintains a strong track record at the ITC for complex Section 337 conflicts across the technology and life sciences sectors. The department is distinguished by its expertise handling high-stakes competitor vs. competitor cases involving industry-leading companies. The team recently dealt with a business-critical case for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation before the ITC and district court. The practice is co-led by the renowned Bert C. Reiser, the team’s port of call for high-stakes ITC matters, and Jamie D. Underwood, another recognised ITC leader with specialized trade experience. Michael David is singled out for his ability to represent complainants, respondents and third parties before the ITC. First-chair trial lawyer Kevin Wheeler focuses on competitor disputes and typically represents leading technology and medical device companies. The ITC team are further supported by the firm’s Intellectual Property Litigation department co-heads: San Diego-based Jennifer Barry, Austin-based Jeff Homrig and David P. Frazier. All named lawyers practice out of Washington DC, unless otherwise stated.
Practice head(s):
Bert C. Reiser; Jamie D. Underwood
Other key lawyers:
Michael David; Kevin Wheeler: Jennifer Barry; Jeff Homrig; David P. Frazier
Key clients
NETGEAR, Inc.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation
MimirIP LLC
Philip Morris International Inc. and Philip Morris Products S.A.
Serendia LLC
Texas Instruments Incorporated
Work highlights
- Secured a US$135 million award for NETGEAR as part of a billion-dollar global IP dispute against its rival competitor.
- Successfully represented TSMC in the ITC and district court in suits involving advanced semiconductors.
- Represented MimirIP and SK Hynix in an offensive litigation campaign – two separate three-patent offensive litigations at ITC and two separate six-patent cases in district court – relating to DRAM and NAND memory technology.
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP’s dedicated ITC team continues to adeptly navigate a broad array of high-tech and biotech patent litigation cases before the ITC. Demonstrating its expertise, the practice recently represented Samsung in a high-stakes trade secret misappropriation case. The team is co-led by the reputed Alex Lasher and Kevin Chu, who both practice out of Washington DC and leverage extensive experience representing complainants, respondents, and third parties in ITC proceedings. Kevin Johnson, based in Silicon Valley, focuses on technology patents and serves as lead counsel for a notable roster of clients, including Samsung and Sony. In San Francisco, Drew Holmes is a seasoned litigator with experience in a wide variety of technology. Sean Pak, also based in San Francisco and head of the firm’s broader IP litigation practice, is a key trial attorney on behalf of plaintiffs and defendants. Additionally, in Washington DC, Jared Newton specializes in patent infringement, trade secrets, and post-grant review proceedings.
Practice head(s):
Alex Lasher; Kevin Chu
Other key lawyers:
Drew Holmes; David Nelson; Sean Pak; Jared Newton
Key clients
BISSELL Inc.
Google LLC
JUUL Labs and VMR Products
Samsung Display Company, Ltd.
AliveCor
Hesai Group
Ruijie Networks
Klein Tools
GoPro
Work highlights
- Represents JUUL Labs, Inc. (“JLI”) in an ITC investigation asserting four patents against NJOY and Altria relating to e-cigarette technology.
- Represented AliveCor in a “David and Goliath” dispute against Apple.
- Representing Samsung Display Co., Ltd. in a wide-ranging trade secret misappropriation case at the ITC against BOE Technology Group and its related entities (collectively “BOE”)
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is well-versed in Section 337 patent infringement cases and exclusion orders. The practice demonstrates expertise across a diverse range of technologies, including semiconductors, tech devices, medical devices, and chemical products. The team is led by four seasoned IP litigators: Smith R. Brittingham IV, who is dedicated to ITC investigations in a wide range of tech; Elizabeth Niemeyer, who is sought after by international and domestic clients for her expertise on electrical patents; managing partner Erika Harmon Arner, who splits her time between Reston and Washington DC; and Anand K. Sharma. Mareesa A. Frederick is a key name for high-stakes Section 337 proceedings for tech companies. Frank A. DeCosta III is a first-chair litigator who brings expertise related to computers, software and medical devices. In Reston, Lionel M. Lavenue focuses on patent infringement cases. The practice also includes Forrest A. Jones and J. Preston Long, who provide additional expertise in high-tech patents.
Practice head(s):
Smith R. Brittingham IV; Elizabeth A. Niemeyer; Erika Harmon Arner; Anand K. Sharma
Other key lawyers:
Mareesa A. Frederick; Frank A. DeCosta III; Lionel M. Lavenue; Forrest A. Jones; J. Preston Long
Key clients
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG; BMW of North America, LLC
Innoscience Zhuhai Technology Company, Ltd.; Innoscience (Zhuhai) Technology Company, Ltd.; Innoscience, Inc.; Innoscience America, Inc.
Innoscience America, Inc.; Innoscience (Suzhou) Semiconductor Co., Ltd.; InnoScience (Suzhou) Technology Holding Co., Ltd. f/k/a Innoscience (Suzhou) Technology Company, Ltd.; Innoscience (Zhuhai) Technology Company, Ltd.; Infineon Technologies Americas Corp.
MediaTek Inc.; MediaTek USA Inc.
VILOX Sweden AB
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP’s deep bench of lawyers is highly active at the ITC and regularly represents its international clients in high-stakes patent litigation and trade secret cases related to various tech. The team recently achieved a victory for Hugel Inc. and Hugel America at the ITC in a high-profile trade secret misappropriation case. Eric Namrow, in Washington DC, spearheads the firm’s ITC division and represents notable clients in the tech, biotech, retail and telecoms industries. Namrow co-chairs the practice with IP heads Louis Beardell, based in Philadelphia, and Dion Bregman, based in Silicon Valley. Other key names to note in Washington DC include Stephanie Roberts, who specializes in ITC-specific disputes, including domestic industry, injury, remedy, bond and public interest, and Kandis Gibson, who focuses on Section 337 proceedings involving patent infringement and unfair trade practices. In Chicago, Jason White often serves as lead counsel on ITC cases concerning utility and design patents, as well as trade secrets. Calvin Brien, based in Washington DC, utilises his electrical engineering background to navigate complex technical patent and trade secret disputes.
Practice head(s):
Louis W. Beardell; Dion M. Bregman; Eric S. Namrow
Key clients
Iljin Diamond Co., Ltd., Iljin Holdings Co., Ltd., Iljin USA Inc.,|Iljin Europe GmbH, Iljin Japan Co., Ltd., and Iljin China Co., Ltd.
Hugel, Inc. and Hugel America, Inc.
Bluenix Co. Ltd. and its US subsidiary Blue Air FSE LLC
Infinite Electronics, Inc.
Work highlights
- Secured a decisive win for Hugel Inc. and Hugel America in a high-profile trade secret misappropriation and theft/conversion case at the ITC that paves the way for Hugel’s entry into the US botulinum toxin (BTX or Botox) market.
- Retained by Bluenix Co. Ltd. and its US subsidiary Blue Air FSE LLC to represent them in a Section 337 investigation before the US International Trade Commission (ITC) and in a multipatent infringement case before the US District Court for the Central District of California.
- Representing six companies in a multipatent investigation involving polycrystalline diamond compact technology used in a variety of heavy industries such as mining and offshore drilling.
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP leverage its ‘ITC-specific expertise’ to navigate high-stakes, complex Section 337 proceedings. The practice demonstrates particular strength in competitor versus competitor tech patent disputes, having recently handed Google its first-ever loss before the ITC on behalf of its client Sonos. The team also stand out for its expertise in the enforcement and appeal of exclusion orders. Alyssa Caridis, based in Los Angeles, is a seasoned litigator with expertise in various technologies, including computer software and medical devices. Caridis co-chairs the team with Boston-based Sheryl Garko, who is adept at complex patent and trade secret cases. In Silicon Valley, Bas De Blank leads on substantive ITC cases related to infringement, validity and domestic industry. Josh Pond, a ‘strong ITC litigator’ based in Washington DC, focuses on blocking and defending imports before the ITC, representing both domestic and international companies. Tom Chen joined the team from the ITC office in July 2024 and is based in Orange County.
Practice head(s):
Alyssa Caridis; Sheryl Garko
Testimonials
‘Orrick has a solid patent litigation team and also brings ITC-specific expertise to ITC cases.’
‘Josh Pond is a strong ITC litigator and also a pleasant person to work with or against.’
‘The team always give you a quick response and is highly professional.’
‘They can balance the legal requirements and the client’s perspective very well.’
Key clients
Sonos
Realtek Semiconductor
BOE
Trina Solar
Etron Technology
Work highlights
- Represented Sonos in asserting five patents against Google at the ITC. The case resulted in Google’s first-ever loss in the ITC.
- Representing BOE, China’s top display manufacturer, in multiple cases related to a high-stakes global legal dispute concerning OLED displays used in smartphones, tablets, watches, laptops, and other devices.
- Representing Trina Solar in a substantial, multi-forum competitor litigation relating to next-generation TOPCon solar cells. TOPCon technology will be dominant in the solar industry in the coming years, making this strategic campaign for Trina of crucial strategic importance.
Baker Botts L.L.P.
The team at Baker Botts L.L.P. possess a ‘sophisticated understanding of what distinguishes an ITC investigation’ and is highly skilled at competitor disputes for clients across the electronic, tech and telecoms industries. Lisa Kattan, praised by clients as ‘a terrific resource and advocate’, frequently leads high-profile ITC investigations and is based in Washington DC. Kattan co-chairs the practice with Dallas-based Christa Brown-Sanford and New York-based Jennifer Tempesta, both experienced IP litigators trusted by multinational clients. Also in New York, Robert Maier is sought after for his expertise in semiconductors, smartphones and stem cells. Other key practitioners in Washington DC include Katharine Burke, an experienced ITC litigator for a wide range of technologies, and Tommy Martin, who focuses on complex patent and trade secret litigation. Robert Benson and Jeffrey Johnson joined from Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP in February 2024.
Practice head(s):
Christa Brown-Sanford; Jennifer Tempesta; Lisa Kattan
Testimonials
‘Lisa Kattan was an insider at the ITC for many years, and knows it very well. She’s a terrific resource and advocate.’
‘Lisa Kattan is an excellent attorney, skilled and knowledgeable regarding ITC practice.’
‘The Baker Botts ITC team’s sophisticated understand of what makes a difference in an ITC investigation extends far beyond most law firms, who just try to apply a district court approach to ITC investigations Unsurprisingly, they have an incredible win rate.’
‘I have worked very closely with Lisa Kattan for many years. She has a very unusual level of insight and credibility, since she spent years working at the ITC, and maintains relationships with its staff attorneys and judges.’
Key clients
CMC Materials, Inc.
DISH Technologies L.L.C and Sling TV L.L.C.
Kiss Nail Products, Inc., CVS Health Corporation, Ulta Beauty, Inc. and Walmart Inc.
Brother Industries Ltd.
Huber+Suhner
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation (and subsidiaries)
Oxford Nanopore Technologies
Motorola Solutions
TP-Link USA Corporation
Bissell
Kiss Nail Products, Inc.
Work highlights
- Obtained a favorable International Trade Commission (“ITC”) initial determination (“ID”) for CMC Materials in a hard-fought patent infringement case against DuPont de Nemours (“DuPont”).
- Achieved a significant victory for DISH Technologies L.L.C. and Sling TV L.L.C. at the International Trade Commission.
- Defeated one patent on summary determination for KISS Nail Products, Inc. prior to trial; trial on the remaining patent was held in July 2021.
Bartkowski PLLC
Boutique IP litigation firm Bartkowski PLLC specializes in ITC proceedings and represents a diverse range of complainants and respondents. The team is typically engaged by medium to large companies seeking protection from infringing imports or violation claims by non-practising entities, acting as both speciality and primary counsel. Due to the specialised expertise, the team have also been described as ‘an excellent addition to any litigation team’. Founding and managing partner Paul Bartkowski has extensive technical knowledge and experience in Section 337 proceedings, and has been lauded as a ‘go-to source for ITC and IP litigation assistance’. The team is further strengthened by Thomas Burns, who has an impressive track record in the violation stage and enforcement proceedings before the ITC. The firm is based out of Virginia.
Practice head(s):
Paul Bartkowski
Other key lawyers:
Thomas Burns
Testimonials
‘The team, led by Paul Bartkowski, proved to be some of the best litigators that I have ever had the pleasure of working with. Mr Bartkowski has become my go-to source for ITC and IP litigation assistance. He has superior knowledge of the particular rules and proceedings associated with ITC investigations.’
‘Paul Bartkowski and Buddy (Thomas Burns) are fantastic all around. They provide great insight on ITC procedures and the local practitioners.’
‘Smart and dedicated team with engineering and logical understanding of the mechanics of each product that helps tremendously to understand and defend the logic of a problem.’
‘The firm is small, capable and nimble. Very responsive.’
‘The Bartkowski PLLC brings ITC and Section 337 expertise to all of its cases. Unlike its larger firm competitors, its relatively small size provides it with the flexibility to handle engagements of different sizes and commercial significance.’
‘Paul Bartkowski is an excellent ITC lawyer who knows the ITC more than most because of the time spent at the agency.’
‘The firm has a unique experience in ITC investigations. They are an excellent addition to any litigation team to deal with many of the peculiar procedures at the ITC.’
‘Mr. Bartkowski is simply a highly skilled professional who also happens to be a true pleasure to work with. His calm, yet confident demeanour places the client and all who work with him at ease.’
Key clients
Citimarine, L.L.C. and Mabru Power Systems, Inc.
Jeisys Medical Inc. and Cynosure, LLC
Hoshizaki America, Inc.
Broadcom Corp.
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
GoPro Inc.
Lithiumhub Technologies LLC, Lithium Hub LLC, and Martin
Koebler
Vantiva USA, LLC
Work highlights
- Served as primary litigation counsel to Respondents Citimarine, LLC and Mabru Power Systems in U.S. ITC Inv. No. 337-TA- 1346, and served as lead counsel at the evidentiary hearing.
- Served as ITC counsel to Respondents Jeisys and Cynosure in U.S. ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-1356, and represented them at trial.
King & Spalding LLP
Leveraging its expertise in international trade and ‘technical expertise in all industries’, King & Spalding LLP’s ITC department is well-equipped to manage patent litigation, demonstrating particular strength in electrical, computer and mechanical patent cases. The team has also extended its focus to medical devices and pharma patent litigation cases. Jeffrey Telep leads the practice and is adept at litigating high-profile international trade disputes and unfair trade practice investigations. Brian Hill, elected to partnership in January 2025, represents major tech companies, such as Mohawk Industries and North American Rescue. In April 2025, Chris Campbell and Britton Davis moved to Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP .
Practice head(s):
Jeffrey Telep
Other key lawyers:
Brian Hill; Brian Eutermoser; John Roehrick
Testimonials
‘King & Spalding matches expertise combined with a relatively small and senior team allowing the client to benefit from the years of combined ITC experience amongst its lawyers.’
‘Jeff Telep is an experienced ITC litigator who commands a firm grasp on case law and Commission precedent.’
‘Very professional team with strength in every aspect.’
‘Solid knowledge in materials science, chemical engineering, and other related fields; Professional attitude towards IP cases; Clients oriented towards patent litigation; Work hard and easy to access’
‘Extraordinary experience, expertise, and client service; diversity of thought and areas of practice, including specialization in many complex litigation areas, for example, patent infringement, IPRs, trade secrets, ITC litigation, international representation, and technical expertise across industries.’
‘Chris Campbell, Brit Davis, Jeffrey Telep, Brian Eutermoser are an extraordinary team. Their areas of expertise and experience enable them to collaborate to serve clients with complex litigation issues. They work well together and have good communication, responsive to client needs. John Roehrick provides in-depth client support and research, with good client presence and clarity of communication.’
Key clients
Composite Resources Inc. and North American Rescue LLC
Modumetal, Inc.
EMD Serono, Inc.
Causam Enterprises, Inc.
Work highlights
- Successfully represented Composite Resources, Inc. and North American Rescue, the sole U.S. producer and exclusive U.S. distributor, respectively, of combat application tourniquets in a Section 337 investigation by the U.S. International Trade Commission.
- Represented Causam Enterprises, Inc., a U.S.-based innovator, inventor, and patent holder on technology in the Utility Demand-Response market, to commence a section 337 case and parallel district court patent infringement actions against a number of importers and foreign producers of smart thermostats and meters.
- Represented Modumetal, a U.S. manufacturer of patented nanolaminated technology used to coat industrial pipe fittings on a section 337 complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission.
Levi Snotherly & Schaumberg, PLLC
The practice at the boutique firm Levi Snotherly & Schaumberg, PLLC is highly regarded for knowing ‘the ITC inside and out’. The practitioners represent a brought range of clients in the electronics, manufacturing and medical device industries. Based in Washington DC, the team is led by a trio of ITC specialists. Lauded as a ‘zealous advocate’ for his clients, Benjamin Levi focuses on Section 337 proceedings related to a variety of technologies. Rett Snotherly is another key attorney, having litigated every type of Section 337 cases, including violations, enforcement, TEO and advisory proceedings. Tom Schaumberg further bolsters the team’s offering with great ITC experience, particularly in unfair competition cases.
Practice head(s):
Benjamin Levi; Rott Snotherly; Tom Schaumberg
Testimonials
‘The firm specializes in section 337 cases and they have superb knowledge of the law and procedures of these cases.’
‘Benjamin Levi is a zealous advocate for his client and knows ITC law very well.’
‘They know the ITC inside and out.’
Key clients
Efficient Power Conversion (EPC)
West Pharmaceutical
Senko Advance Co. Ltd.
Trina Solar
VC Brands, LLC
Tech Lighting, LLC
TP-Link
Work highlights
- Successfully represented semiconductor manufacturer EPC in its victory at the ITC against its competitor Innoscience. ITC issued remedial orders barring entry into the U.S. of infringing Innoscience products.
- Representing West Pharma in their bid to exclude drug delivery devices from the U.S. market. The ITC has determined that the accused products infringe, and the Commission is currently considering an invalidity defense on which the Chief ALJ has already ruled in West’s favor.
- Successfully defended VC Brands and Tech Lighting in an action WAC Lighting brought to exclude VC Brands and Tech Lighting’s smart ceiling fans from the US market.
Morrison Foerster
Praised by clients as ‘a trusted and reliable partner in litigation and ITC matters’, Morrison Foerster represents both complainants and respondents in Section 337 investigations. Given their specialism in complex technology patents, the team are regularly sought after by tech giants. Mark Whitaker is a multi-patent and trade secret litigator, with a core focus on semiconductors, optical technologies, chemicals and database analytics. Daniel Muino leverages longstanding experience litigating patent and trade secrets disputes. Additionally, Mary Prendergast is ‘a stand-out partner’ known for her ability to litigate complex and high-stakes patent disputes. Whitaker, Muino and Prendergast co-chair the Washington-DC-based team. The team is further supported by the esteemed Brian Busey, who has litigated a vast number Section 337 cases.
Practice head(s):
Mark Whitaker; Daniel Muino; Mary Prendergast
Other key lawyers:
Brian Busey; Rich Hung; Jenna Seleznick
Testimonials
‘Morrison & Foerster’s litigation and ITC practice stands out for its deep expertise, practical approach, and track record of achieving stellar results. The team’s knowledge of substantive law and procedural nuances is unmatched, particularly in high-stakes, complex matters. Their ability to quickly understand the technical and business contexts of a case sets them apart from competitors.’
‘What I’ve particularly valued about working with the team is their pragmatism. They focus on achieving outcomes that align with business goals, balancing aggressive advocacy with a clear-eyed understanding of the risks and opportunities at play.’
‘In addition to their legal acumen, the team’s collaborative and client-focused approach is exceptional. They work seamlessly across practice areas and geographies, ensuring that every angle of a case is thoroughly considered. Their responsiveness and clear communication make them a trusted and reliable partner in litigation and ITC matters.’
‘Whether navigating a high-profile ITC investigation or managing complex, multi-jurisdictional disputes, Morrison & Foerster has demonstrated a consistent ability to deliver practical solutions and outstanding results.’
‘I love the firm’s culture and while they used to be more of a value they still provide good value compared to the most expensive firms.’
‘Rich Hung is my main contact there and is excellent to work with. Jenna Seleznick is very organized and I very much like the work she has done. ’
‘Mary Prendergast is a stand-out partner. She is smart, a good strategist, and excels at client communication and responsiveness.’
Key clients
Arashi Vision Inc. d/b/a Insta360
Rakuten Mobile
Work highlights
O'Melveny
O'Melveny specializes in handling multi-patent and multi-defendant litigation at the ITC, showcasing expertise in representing both complainants and respondents. The team acts for clients in a broad array of industries, including consumer electronics, computer hardware and digital technology. Practising in Washington DC, Sean Trainor stands out for his dedication to Section 337 investigations at the ITC, and co-chairs the department with Los Angeles-based Ryan Yagura, who is well-equipped to lead offensive and defensive patent cases for prominent technology companies. In San Francisco, Darin Snyder is an experienced litigator in patent and trade secret cases, skilled in both trial and appellate proceedings. Nicholas Whilt, based in Los Angeles, is another key practitioner, focusing on tech-intense patent infringements and related exclusion orders.
Practice head(s):
Ryan Yagura; Sean Trainor
Other key lawyers:
Darin Synder; Nicholas Whilt
Testimonials
‘Sean Trainor. He is a leading ITC practitioner, who is a known, respected, and trusted advocate before each ALJ. In joint defense groups, which is common in matters before the ITC, Sean collaborates and ensures that each law firm is engaged and multiple law firms work seamlessly together. His knowledge of ITC procedure, remedies case law, and likely ALJ decisions is unparalleled. The team also includes strong technology expertise, particularly in the chipset, GPU and microprocessor spaces.’
Key clients
Lenovo Group Limited and Lenovo (US) Inc.
Sumitomo Electric
Work highlights
- Defended Lenovo, one the world’s largest manufacturers of consumer electronics, in a Section 337 matter in which IngenioSpec accused Lenovo’s smart glasses of infringing multiple patents.
- Represented Sumitomo Electric entities in Section 337 matter in which the complainant, US Conec, accused certain of Sumitomo Electric’s fiber optical cable connectors and components of infringing several patents.
WilmerHale
Under the leadership of Mark Selwyn in Palo Alto and Amy Wigmore in Washington DC, the team at WilmerHale is renowned for advising a prominent roster of tech clients in competitor versus competitor cases before the ITC. In addition to the co-chairs, James Dowd in Los Angeles brings extensive experience in navigating ITC jury and bench trials, as well as appeals, often representing high-profile clients. In Boston, Sarah Frazier is another key IP litigator, focusing on high-stakes trials.
Practice head(s):
Mark Selwyn; Amy Wigmore
Other key lawyers:
Sarah Frazier
Key clients
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
Lenovo Inc.
CSL Behring
Broadcom Limited
ASML Holding N.V.
Work highlights
- Successfully represented semiconductor manufacturer Skyworks Solutions when its competitor Bell Semiconductor sought to exclude Skyworks’ semiconductor chips from the United States market.
Goodwin
Goodwin remains active at the ITC and is recognised for its work on competitor versus competitor cases. The team recently achieved a complete win for its client Samsung in a multi-patent assertion matter against a competitor. Located in Washington DC, PJ McCarthy chairs the team; McCarthy is a first-chair litigator with specialized expertise in handling Section 337 investigations involving various technologies. The practice is further strengthened by Boston-based Douglas Kline, a seasoned IP litigator with experience representing tech and life science companies in high-stakes cases.
Practice head(s):
PJ McCarthy
Other key lawyers:
Douglas Kline
Key clients
Samsung Electronics Corporation (SEC)
Samsung Electronics America (SEA)
Breeze Smoke
Dongguan (Shenzhen) Shikai Technology Co. (Shikai)
Capital Sales Company
KMT
General Electric Company, Savant & Savant Technologies
Current Lighting Solutions, LLC
GE Lighting, a Savant Company
X1 Discovery, Inc.
Amlogic
Novartis
Biotronik, Inc.
Micro Systems Engineering, Inc.
Shenzhen Absen Optoelectronic Co. Ltd.
Jingrui
Work highlights
Greenberg Traurig LLP
Greenberg Traurig, LLP’s team is well-equipped to handle ITC-specific proceedings, with its seasoned bench of lawyers representing domestic and foreign clients across the tech, biotech, and industrial sectors. Among the team’s stellar roster of clients are Samsung Electronics and LG Electronics. With deep patent trial experience, New York’s Scott Bornstein heads the team. San Francisco-based Nicholas Brown specializes in complex tech patents. In Washington, DC, key practitioners include Vivian Kuo, whose work covers medical and biomedical devices and systems, and Cyrus Frelinghuysen, who focuses on unfair import investigations for both claimants and respondents.
Practice head(s):
Scott Bornstein
Other key lawyers:
Nicholas Brown; Vivian Kuo; Cyrus Frelinghuysen
Key clients
Samsung Electronics
LG Electronics
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. and R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co.
Eaton Corporation
Tripp Lite Holdings, Inc.
Balanced Body, Inc.
Work highlights
- Representing complainant R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in a unique investigation before the U.S. International Trade Commission involving vaping devices imported from China and sold in the United States.
- Represented both LG and Samsung Respondents in a patent-based investigation initiated based on a complaint filed by Roku, Inc. On Oct. 28, 2022, the Commission affirmed the ALJ’s earlier determination that the patent asserted against LG/Samsung is invalid.
- Representing complainant Balanced Body, Inc. in a patent-based investigation targeting infringing Pilates equipment—specifically, reformers—that are being imported from China and sold in the United States.
Husch Blackwell LLP
Husch Blackwell LLP’s ITC practice utilizes the firm’s expertise in international trade and intellectual property to represent clients in Section 337 investigations across various sectors, including biotech, automotive, and manufacturing. The team is well-equipped to handle cases involving competitor disputes, as well as defensive cases against non-practicing entities. The team is led by Beau Jackson, who splits his time between Kansas City and Washington DC; given his ‘wealth of ITC and international trade experience’, Jackson serves as lead counsel in all of the team’s ITC cases. In St Louis, Jennifer Hoekel and Kara Fussner are experienced patent litigators who offer further support.
Practice head(s):
Beau Jackson
Other key lawyers:
Jennifer Hoekel; Kara Fussner
Testimonials
‘The Husch Blackwell ITC group provides solid ITC litigation experience with a larger IP group with patent litigation capabilities. That allows them to fully staff ITC cases and they do so at lower rates than larger coastal firms.’
‘Beau Jackson is an excellent attorney and is pleasant to work with or against. Beau brings a wealth of ITC and international trade experience to the Husch Blackwell team, elevating the team’s capabilities in the ITC.’
Key clients
Altronic LLC
ADC Solutions Auto LLC (d/b/a Type S), Winplus North America, Inc., Winplus NA, LLC
Dometic Corporation and Dometic Sweden AB
Ezurio (f/k/a Laird Connectivity)
Zhuhai Wicue Technology Co., Ltd.
Ventria Bioscience Inc. (a/k/a InVitria and ExpressTec)
Solos Technology, Ltd.
Iristick, Inc.
Jones Day
The ‘highly specialized’ ITC team at Jones Day represents multinational companies in Section 337 Investigations, with particular emphasis on the semiconductor, software, automotive and manufacturing industries. In Dallas, Blaney Harper is an experienced ITC trial lawyer with expertise in medical devices and semiconductors. Harper co-chairs the departments with David Maiorana, who boasts a strong record representing both complainants and respondents in patent infringement cases, and Ryan McCrum, a seasoned first-chair litigator before the ITC. Both Maiorana and McCrum are based in Cleveland. In Washington DC, Vishal Khatri is well-equipped to navigate violation and enforcement proceedings at the ITC. Additionally, John Evans in Cleveland brings further expertise in pattern infringement and trade secret misappropriation cases.
Practice head(s):
Blaney Harper; David M. Maiorana; Ryan B. McCrum
Other key lawyers:
Vishal Khatri; John Evans; Haifeng Huang; Yeah-Sil Moon
Testimonials
‘The team has provided very professional service. The team has well prepared the company witnesses for the trial. ’
‘Mr. Haifeng Huang has organized various aspects of the process in the litigation case well. He has communicated well with every party involved. The billing is clear.’
‘The lawyers at Jones Day were highly specialized in ITC practices and IP law. Their billing was reasonable compared to other similar firms, and they consistently paid attention to their clients’ opinions.’
‘I worked with the partners Blaney Harper and Yeah-Sil Moon on an ITC case. They understood all the detailed processes and the judge’s intentions, and kindly explained everything to us. They have strong communication skills, especially with foreign clients like us.’
Key clients
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. / British American Tobacco
Tineco Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.
Sung Hwan E&B Co. Ltd.
RingConn LLC
Brunswick Corporation
The NOCO Company
Work highlights
- Represents R.J. Reynolds entities as complainants in a Section 337 patent infringement investigation before the ITC against dozens of respondents, alleging infringement of a patent directed to a disposable vaping device and seeking a rare Temporary Exclusion Order.
- Represented and earned a complete victory for Tineco Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. as respondent in an ITC Section 337 investigation involving five patents filed by complainants Bissell Inc. and Bissell Homecare Inc. relating to wet-dry surface cleaning devices.
- Represented SHEnB, a Korean manufacturer of medical devices for the health & beauty industry, and two of its distributors against patent infringement claims brought by Serendia, LLC before the ITC resulting in a favorable settlement during trial.
Ropes & Gray LLP
The team at Ropes & Gray LLP frequently represents both complainants and respondents in patent litigation, trade secret disputes, and unfair competition cases before the ITC. Their practice is especially sought after for handling issues that arise in parallel ITC and PTAB proceedings. Key clients include Roku, SharkNinja, and HP. The team is co-led by Matthew Rizzolo, based in Washington DC, and Steven Pepe, located in New York. Rizzolo is an experienced IP litigator with expertise in various tech, including computer software and hardware, telecoms, and biotech. Pepe specializes in infringement cases, representing both high-profile and start-up tech companies.
Practice head(s):
Steven Pepe; Matthew Rizzolo
Key clients
Roku Inc N
SharkNinja Operating LLC N
HP Inc N
Extreme Networks Inc