As ‘the first set that one calls when needing work done on a POCA case‘, 33 Chancery Lane benefits from ‘sheer depth of expertise’, with members acting for a range of clients, including companies, agencies, and regulatory bodies. Kennedy Talbot KC represents the FCA in an investigation concerning the collapse of Worthington Group Ltd, alongside relevant asset freezing orders. In CPS v Aquila Advisory Limited, Martin Evans KC acted in the Supreme Court in proceedings evaluating the impact of a POCA confiscation order on the “no profit/no conflict” rule. Mark Rainsford KC prosecuted on behalf of the CPS in R v Bellway Homes plc, focused on confiscation proceedings resulting in a £600,000 fine. Also representing the CPS, Fiona Jackson acted in confiscation proceedings in connection with fraud by false representation by a defendant extradited from Switzerland.
Proceeds of crime (POCA) and asset forfeiture in
London Bar33 Chancery Lane
Testimonials
Set
‘33CL is a leading POCA and commercial set with good counsel.‘
‘Without doubt the preeminent set for POCA and asset forfeiture. Advice and service are always excellent and just having counsel from 33 Chancery Lane on board shows the other side you mean business.‘
‘33 Chancery Lane is a specialist set with significant expertise and strength in depth in this field.‘
‘33 CL has a well-deserved reputation in the field of fraud and confiscation.‘
‘The set is a go to for POCA work. They have a real strength in depth and always a good choice of counsel.‘
‘The first set that one calls when needing work done on a POCA case. The sheer depth of expertise is second to none.‘
Clerking
Three Raymond Buildings
‘One of the premier sets for POCA and asset forfeiture‘, members of Three Raymond Buildings represent a range of agencies in relation to restraint, confiscation and civil recovery proceedings targeted towards corporates and individuals. Hugo Keith KC, considered a ‘superb‘ advocate, acted in forfeiture proceedings relating to the son of former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak. Jonathan Ashley-Norman KC acted in R v Mazzarello, £50 million contested confiscation proceedings concerning an absconding defendant connected to Swiss and Lichtenstein funds. Led by Keith KC, Nicholas Yeo represented the defendants in the Court of Appeal in Dines and Others, acting against an application by the Director of Public Prosecutions for mutual legal assistance in connection with alleged VAT fraud.
Testimonials
Set
‘Three Raymond Buildings is the pre-eminent set for criminal litigation. It contains first-class barristers from the most senior to the most junior. An astonishing array of talent really.‘
‘3RB are a very strong set generally.’
‘Three Raymond Buildings are an excellent set.‘
‘One of the premier sets for POCA and asset forfeiture.‘
Clerking
‘The clerking at 3RB is at the very pinnacle in crime. The service received is akin to one of the leading civil sets. Dean Brown in particular is an outstanding clerk. The service is genuinely 5 star.‘
‘Eddie Holland and Dean Brown – five stars to both of them.‘
3 Verulam Buildings
Recognized as an ‘impressive set and a go-to set for proceeds of crime and asset recovery‘, the barristers at 3 Verulam Buildings have expertise in civil recovery procedures, with further emphasis on representing government agencies. Andrew Sutcliffe KC, who is considered an ‘outstanding advocate and adviser‘, led Anne Jeavons in NCA v Nuttall, proceedings focused on the civil recovery of assets stemming from a money laundering operation. Sutcliffe also led Jeavon in Crown Prosecution Service v Aquila Advisory Ltd, a case covering the CPS’ prevention to obtain confiscation proceedings for proceeds of crime directors have received in breach of fiduciary duties. In addition, Tom Rainsbury was instructed by the Director of Public Prosecutions to apply a property freezing order in relation to a bundle of assets, which included cryptoassets, believed to have been obtained through an extensive fraud scheme.
Testimonials
Set
‘3 Verulam Buildings is an impressive set and a go-to set for proceeds of crime and asset recovery.’
‘They are very professional, responsive and practical in their advice.‘
‘Very good set. Consistent across the board.‘
‘3 Verulam Buildings is an excellent set all round for commercial litigation and civil fraud matters.‘
Clerking
‘The clerks are very friendly and helpful. Stephen Penson and Richard Ansell have stood out as going the extra mile to communicate with solicitors.‘
‘Extremely user friendly. Very commercial.’
5 St Andrews Hill
With ‘a number of excellent practitioners in this field‘, the set at 5 St Andrews Hill often deals with account freezing and forfeiture orders, investigation orders and warrants, and unexplained wealth orders, acting on behalf of applicants and respondents alike. Andrew Bird KC – who took silk in 2021 and leads the POCA team – acted for the SFO in R v Petrofac Limited, confiscation proceedings surrounding property obtained as a result of an international bribery scheme surmounting £22 million. Representing the NCA, James Fletcher was successful in enforcement proceedings by achieving final charging orders over land connected to income from criminal conduct. In addition, Gary Pons was instructed by the SFO in relation to a £40 million confiscation order in the Gerald Smith case.
Testimonials
Set
‘5 SAH are an exceptional set. They have been successful in carving out other successful practice areas and a number of members of chambers are seen as experts in their field of specialism.‘
‘A good set all round with some stand out individuals.‘
‘5SAH is increasingly a go-to set for POCA work: they’ve got several really excellent members in this area, and are very easy to get along with as well as fearsomely knowledgeable and intelligent.‘
‘An increasingly formidable POCA set. Highly professional and organised Chambers.‘
‘SAH chambers is really good at POCA and asset forfeiture. They have a number of excellent practitioners in this field.‘
Clerking
‘Dave Scothern is exceptionally helpful and efficient.‘
6KBW College Hill
Members of 6KBW handle a range of proceeds of crime and asset forfeiture matters, with experience prosecuting and defending individuals and corporates in relation to freezing orders, disclosure orders, and overseas applications. Leading William Hays, David Perry KC advised the CPS in connection with issues relating to confiscation orders made in 2016 against two individuals, with further compensation orders sought by the prosecution concerning their roles in a line of acquisitive offending. In addition, in R v Premsaran Patel, Paul Jarvis acted for the CPS in relation to multiple offences of mortgage fraud, a prosecution accompanied by varying third party restraint orders.
33 Chancery Lane
Testimonials
Set
‘33CL is a leading POCA and commercial set with good counsel.‘
‘Without doubt the preeminent set for POCA and asset forfeiture. Advice and service are always excellent and just having counsel from 33 Chancery Lane on board shows the other side you mean business.‘
‘33 Chancery Lane is a specialist set with significant expertise and strength in depth in this field.‘
‘33 CL has a well-deserved reputation in the field of fraud and confiscation.‘
‘The set is a go to for POCA work. They have a real strength in depth and always a good choice of counsel.‘
‘The first set that one calls when needing work done on a POCA case. The sheer depth of expertise is second to none.‘
Clerking
Three Raymond Buildings
‘One of the premier sets for POCA and asset forfeiture‘, members of Three Raymond Buildings represent a range of agencies in relation to restraint, confiscation and civil recovery proceedings targeted towards corporates and individuals. Hugo Keith KC, considered a ‘superb‘ advocate, acted in forfeiture proceedings relating to the son of former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak. Jonathan Ashley-Norman KC acted in R v Mazzarello, £50 million contested confiscation proceedings concerning an absconding defendant connected to Swiss and Lichtenstein funds. Led by Keith KC, Nicholas Yeo represented the defendants in the Court of Appeal in Dines and Others, acting against an application by the Director of Public Prosecutions for mutual legal assistance in connection with alleged VAT fraud.
Testimonials
Set
‘Three Raymond Buildings is the pre-eminent set for criminal litigation. It contains first-class barristers from the most senior to the most junior. An astonishing array of talent really.‘
‘3RB are a very strong set generally.’
‘Three Raymond Buildings are an excellent set.‘
‘One of the premier sets for POCA and asset forfeiture.‘
Clerking
‘The clerking at 3RB is at the very pinnacle in crime. The service received is akin to one of the leading civil sets. Dean Brown in particular is an outstanding clerk. The service is genuinely 5 star.‘
‘Eddie Holland and Dean Brown – five stars to both of them.‘
3 Verulam Buildings
Recognized as an ‘impressive set and a go-to set for proceeds of crime and asset recovery‘, the barristers at 3 Verulam Buildings have expertise in civil recovery procedures, with further emphasis on representing government agencies. Andrew Sutcliffe KC, who is considered an ‘outstanding advocate and adviser‘, led Anne Jeavons in NCA v Nuttall, proceedings focused on the civil recovery of assets stemming from a money laundering operation. Sutcliffe also led Jeavon in Crown Prosecution Service v Aquila Advisory Ltd, a case covering the CPS’ prevention to obtain confiscation proceedings for proceeds of crime directors have received in breach of fiduciary duties. In addition, Tom Rainsbury was instructed by the Director of Public Prosecutions to apply a property freezing order in relation to a bundle of assets, which included cryptoassets, believed to have been obtained through an extensive fraud scheme.
Testimonials
Set
‘3 Verulam Buildings is an impressive set and a go-to set for proceeds of crime and asset recovery.’
‘They are very professional, responsive and practical in their advice.‘
‘Very good set. Consistent across the board.‘
‘3 Verulam Buildings is an excellent set all round for commercial litigation and civil fraud matters.‘
Clerking
‘The clerks are very friendly and helpful. Stephen Penson and Richard Ansell have stood out as going the extra mile to communicate with solicitors.‘
‘Extremely user friendly. Very commercial.’
5 St Andrews Hill
With ‘a number of excellent practitioners in this field‘, the set at 5 St Andrews Hill often deals with account freezing and forfeiture orders, investigation orders and warrants, and unexplained wealth orders, acting on behalf of applicants and respondents alike. Andrew Bird KC – who took silk in 2021 and leads the POCA team – acted for the SFO in R v Petrofac Limited, confiscation proceedings surrounding property obtained as a result of an international bribery scheme surmounting £22 million. Representing the NCA, James Fletcher was successful in enforcement proceedings by achieving final charging orders over land connected to income from criminal conduct. In addition, Gary Pons was instructed by the SFO in relation to a £40 million confiscation order in the Gerald Smith case.
Testimonials
Set
‘5 SAH are an exceptional set. They have been successful in carving out other successful practice areas and a number of members of chambers are seen as experts in their field of specialism.‘
‘A good set all round with some stand out individuals.‘
‘5SAH is increasingly a go-to set for POCA work: they’ve got several really excellent members in this area, and are very easy to get along with as well as fearsomely knowledgeable and intelligent.‘
‘An increasingly formidable POCA set. Highly professional and organised Chambers.‘
‘SAH chambers is really good at POCA and asset forfeiture. They have a number of excellent practitioners in this field.‘
Clerking
‘Dave Scothern is exceptionally helpful and efficient.‘
6KBW College Hill
Members of 6KBW handle a range of proceeds of crime and asset forfeiture matters, with experience prosecuting and defending individuals and corporates in relation to freezing orders, disclosure orders, and overseas applications. Leading William Hays, David Perry KC advised the CPS in connection with issues relating to confiscation orders made in 2016 against two individuals, with further compensation orders sought by the prosecution concerning their roles in a line of acquisitive offending. In addition, in R v Premsaran Patel, Paul Jarvis acted for the CPS in relation to multiple offences of mortgage fraud, a prosecution accompanied by varying third party restraint orders.