1 Crown Office Row is well-regarded for its ‘high-value, complex clinical negligence work’ and is described by some as ‘the premier clinical negligence set’. The team in chambers offers an impressive breadth and depth of experience in the field and is well-regarded for its ‘experience, expertise, intellect and empathy at all levels’. It is renowned in this practice area for its work on some of the highest-profile cases, acting for private and publicly funded claimants. ‘Excellent advocate’ Philip Havers KC notably represented the appellant in the Supreme Court case of Meadows v Khan, which clarified the ambit of scope of duty owed by a GP; this particular case concerned whether a woman who was negligently not advised of being a carrier of the haemophilia gene was able to recover damages connected to the child’s autism as well. Additionally, Robert Kellar KC represents the claimant in the fatal case of Healey v McGrath & Ramsay Healthcare, wherein it is alleged that the surgeons negated to check for post-operative complications; if it proceeds to trial the case will raise an issue regarding whether a non-delegable duty of care is owed by private hospitals in respect of their surgeons. Shahram Sharghy, who joined the chambers in 2021, is described as being ‘an astute barrister at the top of his game’, and rising star in the field Emma-Louise Fenelon.
Clinical negligence in
London Bar1 Crown Office Row
Testimonials
Set
‘1 Crown Office Row are the standout set for clinical negligence.’
‘The foremost set for clinical negligence in my view. All of their barristers are extremely good.’
‘1 Crown Office Row is an excellent and well-respected clinical negligence set.’
‘A fantastic clinical negligence set with experience, expertise, intellect and empathy at all levels.’
‘The premier clinical negligence set – their expertise is unparalleled.’
Clerking
‘Clerks at 1 Crown Office Row are unrivalled – special mention for Andy Tull and John Mclaren.’
7BR
7BR is well-known for its ‘considerable strength-in-depth’. Noteworthy silks in the set include Simeon Maskrey KC, who is described as being ‘in a field of his own’, a standout recent case of his being the Supreme Court case of Khan v Meadows in which he successfully represented the defendant, clarifying the scope of duty owed by a GP. In addition, he is acting on behalf of the government of Trinidad and Tobago in the maximum severity matter of JJ (by his mother) v North West Regional Health Authority wherein a claim has been brought for negligence and subsequent damages regarding an alleged mismanagement of birth. Hugh Preston KC has a developing reputation for maximum severity and complex birth injury cases, as does Richard Baker KC, both of whom are acting on behalf of claimants on the high-profile maternity scandal cases involving Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust. Rose Harvey-Sullivan is a developing a specialism in negligence matters involving complex mental health factors.
Testimonials
Set
‘Very strong for clinical negligence. They put on a set of six training sessions annually – run with input from both counsel and medical experts, which is always incredibly useful.’
‘They are excellent and my go-to set for clinical work.’
‘In my many years of working with this set they have never let me down or failed to cover a case or hearing.’
‘The set has an excellent reputation and considerable strength-in-depth.’
‘Very academic set with good availability for Counsel.’
Clerking
‘Clerks are friendly, approachable and helpful. Always able to offer recommendations or alternatives.’
Hailsham Chambers
The set at Hailsham Chambers is noted for its array of ‘highly-skilled clinical negligence barristers’ with ‘depth of knowledge and experience at all levels’. Andrew Post KC is acting for claimants and defendants on consistently high-value work against experienced silks, particularly in obstetric brain and severe birth injury cases. Junior and ‘highly effective advocate’ Clementine Coram James frequently acts as sole counsel, but is also regularly led by leading silk Dominic Nolan KC in complex cases, such as one regarding a severe spinal injury suffered by a teenager with a profound pre-existing learning disability, and a claim alleging negligently missed intracranial infection leaving lasting brain damage. Justin Meiland is developing a specialism in cases of surgical negligence and failed diagnoses. Fiona Neale retired in 2022.
Testimonials
Set
‘As a set, they offer some very highly-skilled clinical negligence barristers. One thing they all have in-common is their approachability and responsiveness.’
‘Impressive eye for detail on both liability and quantum. Able to quickly assimilate large volumes of evidence and settle concise yet robust pleadings.’
‘This set has very experienced counsel in medical law.’
‘Chambers has an outstanding team of practitioners in medical law with considerable depth-of-knowledge and experience at all levels. It provides an extensive training programme for client firms of solicitors, NHSR and the medical defence societies.’
‘Excellent set of chambers with a real depth-of-knowledge in this field. Lots of great junior barristers to choose from, who do an excellent job.’
Clerking
‘A first-class operation that has previously won awards for the quality of its service. Stephen Smith, senior clerk, has forty years experience in the role and has an unparalleled knowledge of the market.’
Serjeants' Inn Chambers
The ‘extremely reputable’ clinical negligence set at Serjeants’ Inn Chambers is well-regarded as having ‘some of the best’ barristers in the field. Jonathan Holl-Allen KC has acted on particularly standout work involving misdiagnosis and alleged negligence at birth resulting in severe injury, for both claimants and defendants. The appointment of Claire Watson KC to Silk is a noteworthy change in the set. In addition, the ‘extremely intelligent’ Eloise Power is highlighted for her impressive expertise in and work on gynaecological injury matters; her particular standout work includes her action for the defendant in the High Court case of Brint v Barking, Havering and Redbridge NHS Foundation Trust in which breach, causation, fundamental dishonesty and quantum were all disputed in relation to a claim against the trust for failure to warn of the risks of extravasation surgery which allegedly led to a pain condition; the claimant’s recount of events surrounding the surgery was inconsistent and the extent to which this impacts credibility, was considered. Amongst the juniors, Liam Duffy and Jamie Mathieson , who has recently led on catastrophic cases of high-value, are both noteworthy members of the set.
Testimonials
Set
‘Serjeants Inn have a brilliant set of barristers – some of the best in clinical negligence – and the strength runs from their juniors right to the most experienced silks.’
‘An extremely reputable set in clinical negligence work.’
‘A top-tier clinical negligence set.’
‘A fantastic set of chambers. They always go the extra mile to accommodate my requests. They are readily available & willing to assist.’
‘We use this set a lot due to quality and range of counsel.’
Clerking
‘Clerks are very helpful, especially Josie Ryan.’
2 Temple Gardens
2 Temple Gardens has a reputation for its ‘very strong set of barristers’ at all levels. Michael de Navarro KC, described as a ‘leader in the field of clinical negligence’ notably appeared in Toombes v Mitchell in 2021, in which a GP was held liable to pay damages to the claimant for offering negligent advice to her mother pre-conception, drawing a distinction between “wrongful conception” and “wrongful birth” claims, which English law generally frowns upon. Caroline Harrison KC represented the NHS Trust in Colley v Hull & East Yorkshire NHS Trust, in which a clinical negligence claimant’s mother received a suspended six-month sentence for contempt of court after exaggerating her daughter’s hip dysplasia birth injuries in a case which was initially settled for £5.4m; the case is thought to be the first committal to prison of a litigation friend in the clinical negligence context. Robert Cumming has also been involved in noteworthy cases, including his representation of the defendant in the stroke prevention case of Watson v Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS.
Testimonials
Set
‘I am regularly able to call upon suitably qualified and experienced counsel at this set.’
‘This is a set that we are using with increasing frequency. They have some outstanding individuals.’
‘Very strong set of barristers. Would be one of my first choices to use in any given case.’
‘Really excellent set, particularly for clinical negligence and personal injury work. A huge pool of talent amongst all their barristers.’
‘2 Temple Gardens are the go-to set for clinical negligence. They are fantastic as to the service they provide and have a range of barristers to instruct in the clinical negligence field.’
Clerking
‘Very efficient and friendly clerks.’
39 Essex Chambers
‘Really good set for clinical negligence’ 39 Essex Chambers, described as ‘growing and ever-impressive’, has had a particularly strong year in clinical negligence. Well-versed in claimant and defendant work, Charlie Cory-Wright KC has done noteworthy work for the claimant in the complex, multi-factorial negligence case of ET v Aberstawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board wherein the 39-year-old woman is claiming in excess of £5m for serious neurological spinal damage, as well as other cases involving infant injury and secondary victims. In addition, junior Romilly Cummerson is appearing regularly as part of the NHS Resolution panel, she is often led by ‘one of the greats’ Neil Block KC, but also has ample experience acting as sole counsel opposite silks, an example of such work being JH v East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust in which she successfully reached settlement for the trust in a case brought against them for failure to diagnose meningococcal septicaemia, which led to the claimant’s need for bilateral leg amputations and hearing loss.
Testimonials
Set
‘A strong set for defendant clinical claims.’
‘A growing and ever-impressive set.’
‘I am a huge fan of 39 Essex Chambers. They have a technically sound set of barristers, with great client care skills.’
‘This is a really good set for clinical negligence.’
‘Very good with clients, particularly in cases which are sensitive and upsetting.’
Clerking
‘The clerks all very helpful and responsive.’
Deka Chambers
Deka Chambers, formed from the merger of 9 Gough Chambers and 1 Chancery Lane is known for its ‘counsel of excellent calibre’ as well as its ‘breadth and depth of experience and talent’, work amongst those in the set ranging from misdiagnoses to complex catastrophic cases. Stuart Mckechnie KC has a growing reputation in complex brain and birth injury work, notably successfully settling IXM (A Minor) v Norfolk & Norwich Hospitals NHS for the claimant for a proposed £33.2m, which, if approved, would be one of the largest ever settlements in this practice area in England and Wales; the case involves a birth injury which led to multi-factorial issues of severe brain injury, hypothalamic damage and intractable epilepsy, which have resulted in the claimant’s need for constant care. In addition, amongst the juniors, ‘excellent advocate’ Adam Dawson has done impressive work on fatal cases, whilst Abigail Stamp is active in high-value neurological and surgical cases. From the 1 Chancery Lane side of the merger, Edward Bishop KC and Susanna Bennett, were involved in Traylor and Traylor v Kent and Medway NHS Social Care Partnership Trust, a case concerning complex mental health factors.
Testimonials
Set
‘The set is commercial and has a wide range of counsel of excellent calibre.’
‘Deka Chambers still rank amongst the very best sets for claimant personal injury and clinical negligence.’
‘A good set with a solid set of counsel to choose from.’
Clerking
‘Michael Goodridge remains the stalwart of the set. He is the architect behind their success. He is hugely personable and commercially astute and alive to the needs of those who instruct chambers.’
‘The clerks are always helpful and if a barrister of choice is not available, there is always someone else of similar call and experience that can assist.’
‘David Barrow and Clark Chessis in particular are real assets to chambers and are always keen to help. The clerks are very organised, responsive and I have never needed to chase them for anything.’
Crown Office Chambers
With ‘a number of excellent quality counsel in the field’, the set at Crown Office Chambers has a strong reputation in clinical negligence. Its ‘brilliant barristers’ include Claire Toogood KC, who was appointed silk in the 2022 round and is renowned for her ‘forensic attention-to-detail’, a pre-eminent case of hers being her unled representation of the defendant in Zgonec-Rozej v Pereira, a case concerning the psychiatric care provided to a criminal silk who took his own life after walking out of a hospital where he was receiving psychiatric care. Gemma Witherington has this year acted as sole counsel for the claimants in the complex and sensitive High Court case of Uriely v Royal Free NHS Hospital Foundation Trust, in which the parents of a deceased 9-year-old boy are claiming damages as secondary victims, being that they suffered through witnessing his fatal asthma attack. The set is growing markedly at the junior end, having gained among others Katie Ayres, formerly of 1 Chancery Lane.
Testimonials
Set
‘A number of excellent quality counsel in the field of clinical negligence, who are willing to go the extra mile. If instructed Counsel is not available for some reason, there is always another Counsel that can be trusted to step in for a hearing if need be. Really good communication and co-operation across the set and genuinely pleasant individuals.’
‘It is a very strong set in clinical negligence and more often than not has alternative counsel available where necessary.’
‘This is a top set for clinical negligence work. They have strength from the top silks right down to the most recent tenants. All their counsel specialising in this area are worthy of instruction. They seem to attract really bright barristers, who have all the right skills on paper and as advocates, as well as being user-friendly and down to earth.’
‘In the clinical negligence sector, the set is well-regarded.’
‘A very good clinical negligence set with great depth of counsel.’
Clerking
‘The best customer service and clerks’ room that there is. Greg Frewin is a real asset to the team with an excellent knowledge of the strengths and availability of the individual barristers.’
Outer Temple Chambers
Outer Temple Chambers
‘ clinical negligence team is noted for its ‘excellent strength-in-depth’ and ‘expertise’ in the field. Eliot Woolf KC acted for the claimant in the wrongful birth Supreme Court case of Khan v Meadows, while Nathan Tavares KC represents the claimant in a case concerning an alleged failure to arrange blood tests in time to notice a secondary tumour arising from prostate cancer, allegedly rendering the claimant a paraplegic. Junior Daniel Clarke is noted for his sole-action on fatal, high-value cases such as Holmes v East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust, wherein he is acting for the claimant family of a 49-year-old man who died during an operation, who are claiming against the ambulance service for failing to admit the patient when his symptoms started and against the Trust for delaying his operation for several days following his admission.
Testimonials
Set
‘Leading set of chambers recognised for their expertise in personal injury and clinical negligence.’
‘There is excellent strength-in-depth across Outer Temple Chambers as a whole and we have been impressed with the quality of the advice given across the board from junior junior barristers up to KC level.’
‘A very personable set and lovely to work with. We have always been able to access appropriate counsel easily.’
‘Strong set with regard to personal injury and clinical negligence practitioners.’
‘Outer Temple is an established, top-ranking chambers. It has both track record and a modern commercial approach. There are many strong choices of counsel. It is a most impressive set.’
Clerking
‘Mark Gardner is a meticulous and organised clerk who offers a superb service. He is an asset to Outer Temple Chambers.’
12 King's Bench Walk
12 King’s Bench Walk is noted for its ‘increasingly strong clinical negligence presence’; the team are well-versed in a breadth of cases including the complex areas of birth, brain and spinal cord injury. The ‘incredible barristers’ in the set include catastrophic injury specialist and ‘formidable opponent’ William Audland KC; a noteworthy recent success of his being on the case of AB v Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust wherein he and ‘promising junior’ Isaac Hogarth secured a settlement of £1.85m and annual lifetime periodical payments for an elderly grandmother who suffered hypoxic brain injury and multiple organ failure as a result of loss of blood caused by negligent groin hernia repair surgery. Turning to the set’s juniors, Edward Ramsay is acting on some particularly complex psychiatric injury and fatal cases.
Testimonials
Set
‘A well-run set with an increasingly strong clinical negligence presence and some very promising juniors – notably Isaac Hogarth and Vanessa Cashman.’
‘An excellent set. Counsel are regularly available and the webinar free training programmes the set provides are of excellent quality.’
‘A good set with a strong reputation.’
’12 King’s Bench Walk are a great set full of incredible barristers.’
‘Great set for clinical negligence with good breadth or expertise and knowledge at all levels. They also offer a great webinar series on clinical negligence.’
Clerking
‘Clerks are very efficient and pleasant to deal with.’
Cloisters
Cloisters is well-known as a ‘pre-eminent set for clinical negligence’, with ‘impressive barristers at all levels’. In particular, the ‘outstanding’ William Latimer-Sayer KC acts on consistently complex matters and has noteworthy expertise in quantum. Simon Taylor KC has continued his impressive work, namely on catastrophic birth and brain injury cases. Further, junior Hannah Godfrey has notably acted as sole counsel on multiple catastrophic injury cases in the High Court. Additionally, Tamar Burton has done impressive work drafting high-value and complex schedules of loss, whilst Linda Jacobs has acted successfully for the claimant on the high-profile matter of Bridgman v University Hospitals and Warwickshire NHS Trust, in which case the deceased had an operation to remove a benign brain tumour which left him in a vegetative state, further procedures to stop haemorrhaging produced by the surgical technique used to remove the tumour resulted in the meningitis which ultimately caused his death.
Testimonials
Set
‘Cloisters remain one of our go-to sets, with impressive barristers at all levels and a commercial perspective.’
‘Excellent chambers – good choice of counsel, efficient clerks – a good set to work with.’
‘Cloisters are a leading clinical negligence set, they have good strength-in-depth.’
‘Cloisters is a pre-eminent set for clinical negligence.’
‘The set has high-standards for admission and the newest recruits bear this out.’
Clerking
‘Chambers are supported by a very able and enthusiastic team of clerks.’
Devereux
Devereux is ‘a great set with a broad depth of experience in the field of medical negligence’. ‘Leader in the field’ Robert Glancy KC has continued to work on catastrophic brain and spinal cases as well as birth injury cases. Robert Weir KC acted for the claimants on the particularly noteworthy Court of Appeal case Paul and Paul v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, in which the deceased’s young daughters witnessed his heart attack, which occurred 14-months after he was treated for acute coronary symptoms – it is alleged at his initial consultation he should have been given a coronary angiogram which would have revealed his coronary artery disease and ultimately prevented his death; the claimants have been granted approval for hearing at the Supreme Court on this matter. Junior Colin Mendoza, described as having a ‘vast wealth of experience’ in the field, is developing a specialism in complex surgical negligence and brain injury cases.
Testimonials
Set
‘Exceptional set, with leading junior and senior counsel.’
‘Devereux Chambers are a great set with a broad depth of experience in the field of medical negligence.’
‘The barristers are fearless and willing to take on difficult cases.’
‘This is a set with friendly and supportive counsel.’
‘Devereux are a tremendous set. They have great silks and fantastic senior juniors.’
Clerking
‘Very helpful and amenable clerks – I would particularly single-out Cyrus Biggs and Zoe Hamilton.’
Old Square Chambers
Old Square Chambers has a strong reputation for its clinical negligence ‘expertise’ and its ‘strength-in-depth’ in the field. Ben Collins KC continues to act on impressive matters, including the high-profile blood inquiry case of McLean v Secretary of State for Health and the dental cases of Hughes v Rattan and Pawley v Whitecross Dental, which established that patients have the right to sue dental practices, not just individual dentists. Junior Sophie Beesley is developing a specialism in complex brain, birth and psychiatric injury work. Charles Woodhouse KC took silk in the 2022 round.
Testimonials
Set
‘Increasing its recognition as one of the top specialist clinical negligence sets in my view.’
‘Some exceptional barristers here.’
‘A chambers that we are continually going back to for the expertise and individual counsel.’
‘This chambers have strength-in-depth.’
Clerking
‘A great clerking team. William Meade, Olivia Moliterno and Joe Kallas deserve a special mention.’
‘The clerks are always willing to engage, offer training and have a very collaborative approach.’
1 Crown Office Row
Testimonials
Set
‘1 Crown Office Row are the standout set for clinical negligence.’
‘The foremost set for clinical negligence in my view. All of their barristers are extremely good.’
‘1 Crown Office Row is an excellent and well-respected clinical negligence set.’
‘A fantastic clinical negligence set with experience, expertise, intellect and empathy at all levels.’
‘The premier clinical negligence set – their expertise is unparalleled.’
Clerking
‘Clerks at 1 Crown Office Row are unrivalled – special mention for Andy Tull and John Mclaren.’
7BR
7BR is well-known for its ‘considerable strength-in-depth’. Noteworthy silks in the set include Simeon Maskrey KC, who is described as being ‘in a field of his own’, a standout recent case of his being the Supreme Court case of Khan v Meadows in which he successfully represented the defendant, clarifying the scope of duty owed by a GP. In addition, he is acting on behalf of the government of Trinidad and Tobago in the maximum severity matter of JJ (by his mother) v North West Regional Health Authority wherein a claim has been brought for negligence and subsequent damages regarding an alleged mismanagement of birth. Hugh Preston KC has a developing reputation for maximum severity and complex birth injury cases, as does Richard Baker KC, both of whom are acting on behalf of claimants on the high-profile maternity scandal cases involving Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust. Rose Harvey-Sullivan is a developing a specialism in negligence matters involving complex mental health factors.
Testimonials
Set
‘Very strong for clinical negligence. They put on a set of six training sessions annually – run with input from both counsel and medical experts, which is always incredibly useful.’
‘They are excellent and my go-to set for clinical work.’
‘In my many years of working with this set they have never let me down or failed to cover a case or hearing.’
‘The set has an excellent reputation and considerable strength-in-depth.’
‘Very academic set with good availability for Counsel.’
Clerking
‘Clerks are friendly, approachable and helpful. Always able to offer recommendations or alternatives.’
Hailsham Chambers
The set at Hailsham Chambers is noted for its array of ‘highly-skilled clinical negligence barristers’ with ‘depth of knowledge and experience at all levels’. Andrew Post KC is acting for claimants and defendants on consistently high-value work against experienced silks, particularly in obstetric brain and severe birth injury cases. Junior and ‘highly effective advocate’ Clementine Coram James frequently acts as sole counsel, but is also regularly led by leading silk Dominic Nolan KC in complex cases, such as one regarding a severe spinal injury suffered by a teenager with a profound pre-existing learning disability, and a claim alleging negligently missed intracranial infection leaving lasting brain damage. Justin Meiland is developing a specialism in cases of surgical negligence and failed diagnoses. Fiona Neale retired in 2022.
Testimonials
Set
‘As a set, they offer some very highly-skilled clinical negligence barristers. One thing they all have in-common is their approachability and responsiveness.’
‘Impressive eye for detail on both liability and quantum. Able to quickly assimilate large volumes of evidence and settle concise yet robust pleadings.’
‘This set has very experienced counsel in medical law.’
‘Chambers has an outstanding team of practitioners in medical law with considerable depth-of-knowledge and experience at all levels. It provides an extensive training programme for client firms of solicitors, NHSR and the medical defence societies.’
‘Excellent set of chambers with a real depth-of-knowledge in this field. Lots of great junior barristers to choose from, who do an excellent job.’
Clerking
‘A first-class operation that has previously won awards for the quality of its service. Stephen Smith, senior clerk, has forty years experience in the role and has an unparalleled knowledge of the market.’
Serjeants' Inn Chambers
The ‘extremely reputable’ clinical negligence set at Serjeants’ Inn Chambers is well-regarded as having ‘some of the best’ barristers in the field. Jonathan Holl-Allen KC has acted on particularly standout work involving misdiagnosis and alleged negligence at birth resulting in severe injury, for both claimants and defendants. The appointment of Claire Watson KC to Silk is a noteworthy change in the set. In addition, the ‘extremely intelligent’ Eloise Power is highlighted for her impressive expertise in and work on gynaecological injury matters; her particular standout work includes her action for the defendant in the High Court case of Brint v Barking, Havering and Redbridge NHS Foundation Trust in which breach, causation, fundamental dishonesty and quantum were all disputed in relation to a claim against the trust for failure to warn of the risks of extravasation surgery which allegedly led to a pain condition; the claimant’s recount of events surrounding the surgery was inconsistent and the extent to which this impacts credibility, was considered. Amongst the juniors, Liam Duffy and Jamie Mathieson , who has recently led on catastrophic cases of high-value, are both noteworthy members of the set.
Testimonials
Set
‘Serjeants Inn have a brilliant set of barristers – some of the best in clinical negligence – and the strength runs from their juniors right to the most experienced silks.’
‘An extremely reputable set in clinical negligence work.’
‘A top-tier clinical negligence set.’
‘A fantastic set of chambers. They always go the extra mile to accommodate my requests. They are readily available & willing to assist.’
‘We use this set a lot due to quality and range of counsel.’
Clerking
‘Clerks are very helpful, especially Josie Ryan.’
2 Temple Gardens
2 Temple Gardens has a reputation for its ‘very strong set of barristers’ at all levels. Michael de Navarro KC, described as a ‘leader in the field of clinical negligence’ notably appeared in Toombes v Mitchell in 2021, in which a GP was held liable to pay damages to the claimant for offering negligent advice to her mother pre-conception, drawing a distinction between “wrongful conception” and “wrongful birth” claims, which English law generally frowns upon. Caroline Harrison KC represented the NHS Trust in Colley v Hull & East Yorkshire NHS Trust, in which a clinical negligence claimant’s mother received a suspended six-month sentence for contempt of court after exaggerating her daughter’s hip dysplasia birth injuries in a case which was initially settled for £5.4m; the case is thought to be the first committal to prison of a litigation friend in the clinical negligence context. Robert Cumming has also been involved in noteworthy cases, including his representation of the defendant in the stroke prevention case of Watson v Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS.
Testimonials
Set
‘I am regularly able to call upon suitably qualified and experienced counsel at this set.’
‘This is a set that we are using with increasing frequency. They have some outstanding individuals.’
‘Very strong set of barristers. Would be one of my first choices to use in any given case.’
‘Really excellent set, particularly for clinical negligence and personal injury work. A huge pool of talent amongst all their barristers.’
‘2 Temple Gardens are the go-to set for clinical negligence. They are fantastic as to the service they provide and have a range of barristers to instruct in the clinical negligence field.’
Clerking
‘Very efficient and friendly clerks.’
39 Essex Chambers
‘Really good set for clinical negligence’ 39 Essex Chambers, described as ‘growing and ever-impressive’, has had a particularly strong year in clinical negligence. Well-versed in claimant and defendant work, Charlie Cory-Wright KC has done noteworthy work for the claimant in the complex, multi-factorial negligence case of ET v Aberstawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board wherein the 39-year-old woman is claiming in excess of £5m for serious neurological spinal damage, as well as other cases involving infant injury and secondary victims. In addition, junior Romilly Cummerson is appearing regularly as part of the NHS Resolution panel, she is often led by ‘one of the greats’ Neil Block KC, but also has ample experience acting as sole counsel opposite silks, an example of such work being JH v East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust in which she successfully reached settlement for the trust in a case brought against them for failure to diagnose meningococcal septicaemia, which led to the claimant’s need for bilateral leg amputations and hearing loss.
Testimonials
Set
‘A strong set for defendant clinical claims.’
‘A growing and ever-impressive set.’
‘I am a huge fan of 39 Essex Chambers. They have a technically sound set of barristers, with great client care skills.’
‘This is a really good set for clinical negligence.’
‘Very good with clients, particularly in cases which are sensitive and upsetting.’
Clerking
‘The clerks all very helpful and responsive.’
Deka Chambers
Deka Chambers, formed from the merger of 9 Gough Chambers and 1 Chancery Lane is known for its ‘counsel of excellent calibre’ as well as its ‘breadth and depth of experience and talent’, work amongst those in the set ranging from misdiagnoses to complex catastrophic cases. Stuart Mckechnie KC has a growing reputation in complex brain and birth injury work, notably successfully settling IXM (A Minor) v Norfolk & Norwich Hospitals NHS for the claimant for a proposed £33.2m, which, if approved, would be one of the largest ever settlements in this practice area in England and Wales; the case involves a birth injury which led to multi-factorial issues of severe brain injury, hypothalamic damage and intractable epilepsy, which have resulted in the claimant’s need for constant care. In addition, amongst the juniors, ‘excellent advocate’ Adam Dawson has done impressive work on fatal cases, whilst Abigail Stamp is active in high-value neurological and surgical cases. From the 1 Chancery Lane side of the merger, Edward Bishop KC and Susanna Bennett, were involved in Traylor and Traylor v Kent and Medway NHS Social Care Partnership Trust, a case concerning complex mental health factors.
Testimonials
Set
‘The set is commercial and has a wide range of counsel of excellent calibre.’
‘Deka Chambers still rank amongst the very best sets for claimant personal injury and clinical negligence.’
‘A good set with a solid set of counsel to choose from.’
Clerking
‘Michael Goodridge remains the stalwart of the set. He is the architect behind their success. He is hugely personable and commercially astute and alive to the needs of those who instruct chambers.’
‘The clerks are always helpful and if a barrister of choice is not available, there is always someone else of similar call and experience that can assist.’
‘David Barrow and Clark Chessis in particular are real assets to chambers and are always keen to help. The clerks are very organised, responsive and I have never needed to chase them for anything.’
Crown Office Chambers
With ‘a number of excellent quality counsel in the field’, the set at Crown Office Chambers has a strong reputation in clinical negligence. Its ‘brilliant barristers’ include Claire Toogood KC, who was appointed silk in the 2022 round and is renowned for her ‘forensic attention-to-detail’, a pre-eminent case of hers being her unled representation of the defendant in Zgonec-Rozej v Pereira, a case concerning the psychiatric care provided to a criminal silk who took his own life after walking out of a hospital where he was receiving psychiatric care. Gemma Witherington has this year acted as sole counsel for the claimants in the complex and sensitive High Court case of Uriely v Royal Free NHS Hospital Foundation Trust, in which the parents of a deceased 9-year-old boy are claiming damages as secondary victims, being that they suffered through witnessing his fatal asthma attack. The set is growing markedly at the junior end, having gained among others Katie Ayres, formerly of 1 Chancery Lane.
Testimonials
Set
‘A number of excellent quality counsel in the field of clinical negligence, who are willing to go the extra mile. If instructed Counsel is not available for some reason, there is always another Counsel that can be trusted to step in for a hearing if need be. Really good communication and co-operation across the set and genuinely pleasant individuals.’
‘It is a very strong set in clinical negligence and more often than not has alternative counsel available where necessary.’
‘This is a top set for clinical negligence work. They have strength from the top silks right down to the most recent tenants. All their counsel specialising in this area are worthy of instruction. They seem to attract really bright barristers, who have all the right skills on paper and as advocates, as well as being user-friendly and down to earth.’
‘In the clinical negligence sector, the set is well-regarded.’
‘A very good clinical negligence set with great depth of counsel.’
Clerking
‘The best customer service and clerks’ room that there is. Greg Frewin is a real asset to the team with an excellent knowledge of the strengths and availability of the individual barristers.’
Outer Temple Chambers
Outer Temple Chambers‘ clinical negligence team is noted for its ‘excellent strength-in-depth’ and ‘expertise’ in the field. Eliot Woolf KC acted for the claimant in the wrongful birth Supreme Court case of Khan v Meadows, while Nathan Tavares KC represents the claimant in a case concerning an alleged failure to arrange blood tests in time to notice a secondary tumour arising from prostate cancer, allegedly rendering the claimant a paraplegic. Junior Daniel Clarke is noted for his sole-action on fatal, high-value cases such as Holmes v East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust, wherein he is acting for the claimant family of a 49-year-old man who died during an operation, who are claiming against the ambulance service for failing to admit the patient when his symptoms started and against the Trust for delaying his operation for several days following his admission.
Testimonials
Set
‘Leading set of chambers recognised for their expertise in personal injury and clinical negligence.’
‘There is excellent strength-in-depth across Outer Temple Chambers as a whole and we have been impressed with the quality of the advice given across the board from junior junior barristers up to KC level.’
‘A very personable set and lovely to work with. We have always been able to access appropriate counsel easily.’
‘Strong set with regard to personal injury and clinical negligence practitioners.’
‘Outer Temple is an established, top-ranking chambers. It has both track record and a modern commercial approach. There are many strong choices of counsel. It is a most impressive set.’
Clerking
‘Mark Gardner is a meticulous and organised clerk who offers a superb service. He is an asset to Outer Temple Chambers.’
12 King's Bench Walk
12 King’s Bench Walk is noted for its ‘increasingly strong clinical negligence presence’; the team are well-versed in a breadth of cases including the complex areas of birth, brain and spinal cord injury. The ‘incredible barristers’ in the set include catastrophic injury specialist and ‘formidable opponent’ William Audland KC; a noteworthy recent success of his being on the case of AB v Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust wherein he and ‘promising junior’ Isaac Hogarth secured a settlement of £1.85m and annual lifetime periodical payments for an elderly grandmother who suffered hypoxic brain injury and multiple organ failure as a result of loss of blood caused by negligent groin hernia repair surgery. Turning to the set’s juniors, Edward Ramsay is acting on some particularly complex psychiatric injury and fatal cases.
Testimonials
Set
‘A well-run set with an increasingly strong clinical negligence presence and some very promising juniors – notably Isaac Hogarth and Vanessa Cashman.’
‘An excellent set. Counsel are regularly available and the webinar free training programmes the set provides are of excellent quality.’
‘A good set with a strong reputation.’
’12 King’s Bench Walk are a great set full of incredible barristers.’
‘Great set for clinical negligence with good breadth or expertise and knowledge at all levels. They also offer a great webinar series on clinical negligence.’
Clerking
‘Clerks are very efficient and pleasant to deal with.’
Cloisters
Cloisters is well-known as a ‘pre-eminent set for clinical negligence’, with ‘impressive barristers at all levels’. In particular, the ‘outstanding’ William Latimer-Sayer KC acts on consistently complex matters and has noteworthy expertise in quantum. Simon Taylor KC has continued his impressive work, namely on catastrophic birth and brain injury cases. Further, junior Hannah Godfrey has notably acted as sole counsel on multiple catastrophic injury cases in the High Court. Additionally, Tamar Burton has done impressive work drafting high-value and complex schedules of loss, whilst Linda Jacobs has acted successfully for the claimant on the high-profile matter of Bridgman v University Hospitals and Warwickshire NHS Trust, in which case the deceased had an operation to remove a benign brain tumour which left him in a vegetative state, further procedures to stop haemorrhaging produced by the surgical technique used to remove the tumour resulted in the meningitis which ultimately caused his death.
Testimonials
Set
‘Cloisters remain one of our go-to sets, with impressive barristers at all levels and a commercial perspective.’
‘Excellent chambers – good choice of counsel, efficient clerks – a good set to work with.’
‘Cloisters are a leading clinical negligence set, they have good strength-in-depth.’
‘Cloisters is a pre-eminent set for clinical negligence.’
‘The set has high-standards for admission and the newest recruits bear this out.’
Clerking
‘Chambers are supported by a very able and enthusiastic team of clerks.’
Devereux
Devereux is ‘a great set with a broad depth of experience in the field of medical negligence’. ‘Leader in the field’ Robert Glancy KC has continued to work on catastrophic brain and spinal cases as well as birth injury cases. Robert Weir KC acted for the claimants on the particularly noteworthy Court of Appeal case Paul and Paul v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, in which the deceased’s young daughters witnessed his heart attack, which occurred 14-months after he was treated for acute coronary symptoms – it is alleged at his initial consultation he should have been given a coronary angiogram which would have revealed his coronary artery disease and ultimately prevented his death; the claimants have been granted approval for hearing at the Supreme Court on this matter. Junior Colin Mendoza, described as having a ‘vast wealth of experience’ in the field, is developing a specialism in complex surgical negligence and brain injury cases.
Testimonials
Set
‘Exceptional set, with leading junior and senior counsel.’
‘Devereux Chambers are a great set with a broad depth of experience in the field of medical negligence.’
‘The barristers are fearless and willing to take on difficult cases.’
‘This is a set with friendly and supportive counsel.’
‘Devereux are a tremendous set. They have great silks and fantastic senior juniors.’
Clerking
‘Very helpful and amenable clerks – I would particularly single-out Cyrus Biggs and Zoe Hamilton.’
Old Square Chambers
Old Square Chambers has a strong reputation for its clinical negligence ‘expertise’ and its ‘strength-in-depth’ in the field. Ben Collins KC continues to act on impressive matters, including the high-profile blood inquiry case of McLean v Secretary of State for Health and the dental cases of Hughes v Rattan and Pawley v Whitecross Dental, which established that patients have the right to sue dental practices, not just individual dentists. Junior Sophie Beesley is developing a specialism in complex brain, birth and psychiatric injury work. Charles Woodhouse KC took silk in the 2022 round.
Testimonials
Set
‘Increasing its recognition as one of the top specialist clinical negligence sets in my view.’
‘Some exceptional barristers here.’
‘A chambers that we are continually going back to for the expertise and individual counsel.’
‘This chambers have strength-in-depth.’
Clerking
‘A great clerking team. William Meade, Olivia Moliterno and Joe Kallas deserve a special mention.’
‘The clerks are always willing to engage, offer training and have a very collaborative approach.’