Antitrust and competition: Independent local firms
9 firms
Japan
Antitrust and competition: International firms and joint ventures
6 firms
Banking and finance: Independent local firms
10 firms
Banking and finance: International firms and joint ventures
18 firms
Capital markets: Independent local firms
6 firms
Capital markets: International firms and joint ventures
9 firms
Corporate and M&A: Independent local firms
16 firms
Corporate and M&A: International firms and joint ventures
25 firms
Dispute resolution: Independent local firms
13 firms
Dispute resolution: International firms and joint ventures
8 firms
Fintech - Independent local firms
6 firms
Fintech - International firms and joint ventures
3 firms
Intellectual property: Independent local firms
12 firms
Intellectual property: International firms and joint ventures
9 firms
Investment funds: Independent local firms
8 firms
Investment funds: International firms and joint ventures
9 firms
Labour and employment: Independent local firms
12 firms
Labour and employment: International firms and joint ventures
5 firms
Private wealth: Independent local firms
5 firms
Projects and energy: Independent local firms
9 firms
Projects and energy: International firms and joint ventures
16 firms
Real estate and construction: Independent local firms
10 firms
Real estate and construction: International firms and joint ventures
10 firms
Restructuring and insolvency: Independent local firms
6 firms
Restructuring and insolvency: International firms and joint ventures
1 firm
Risk management and investigations: Independent local firms
8 firms
Shipping: Independent local firms
5 firms
Tax: Independent local firms
6 firms
Tax: International firms and joint ventures
5 firms
TMT: Independent local firms
11 firms
TMT: International firms and joint ventures
6 firms
News & Developments
ViewViewIntellectual Property
Judgment rendered by the Grand Panel of the Intellectual Property High Court on March 19, 2025, regarding the patentability of compositions which contemplate medical procedures both before and after manufacture
Introduction
On March 19, 2025, the Grand Panel of the Intellectual Property High Court (the “IPHC”) rendered their judgment in a patent infringement case. The court reversed a Tokyo District Court’s judgment and found that the defendant had infringed the plaintiff’s patent.
Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu - 28 April 2025
Intellectual Property
Update: A Second Court Decision addressing Patent Linkage and Unfair Competition
Introduction
As reported in NO&T IP Law Update No.8, on October 28, 2024, the Tokyo District Court issued a decision in a case involving a biosimilar manufacturer seeking a preliminary injunction against a patent holder (Samsung Bioepis Co. Ltd. v. Bayer HealthCare LLC.
Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu - 28 April 2025
Intellectual Property
Patents: – The Principle of Territoriality: Two Notable Judgments of the Supreme Court of Japan rendered on March 3, 2025
NEW JUDGMENTS – Principle of Territoriality and Infringement of Japanese Patent Rights regarding “Network-Related Inventions”
1. Summary
The Supreme Court of Japan rendered two unprecedented judgments on March 3, 2025, addressing the application of the principle of territoriality of patents to cross-border activities.
Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu - 28 April 2025
Hospitality
2025 CUSTOMER HARASSMENT PREVENTION UPDATE
Introduction.
Japan is known as a country of hospitality, or "Omotenashi," and in recent years, it has led customers in Japan to take such hospitality for granted.
Aquaxis Law Office - 04 March 2025