The Legal 500

Chambers of Christopher Rees

20 CATHEDRAL ROAD, CARDIFF, CF11 9LJ, WALES
Tel:
Work 02920 232032
Fax:
Fax 02920 233636
DX:
141874 CARDIFF 28
Email:
Web:
www.apexchambers.net

Regional Bar

Recommendations


Regional Bar

Within Set overviews: England and Wales,

Apex Chambers is a specialist crime and regulatory set where barristers conduct advocacy nationwide. Organised crime, fraud and professional discipline are particular areas of strength; a number of senior members are CPS grade-four prosecutors or on the HSE list of approved prosecutors. Tom Crowther QC, who took silk in 2013, was appointed as a circuit judge in the same year. The set provides an ‘exceptional service' and the clerks’ room is ‘very friendly and easy to deal with'. Senior clerk Craig Mansfield is ‘very professional'. Offices in: Cardiff

[back to top]

Regional Bar: Wales and Chester Circuit

Within Crime,

With a sizeable team and strength in depth, Apex Chambers provides ‘an exceptional service', and is one of the leading sets in Wales for crime. Its members prosecute and defend on a wide range of cases throughout England and Wales, including complex fraud, large-scale drugs conspiracies and sexual offences. In 2013, counsel acted in a series of high-profile fraud cases including a matter involving the nationwide selling of bogus mobile phone insurance policies.

[back to top]

Within Leading sets Wales and Chester Circuit - Leading sets

[back to top]

Within Regulatory, health and safety, and licensing,

A significant number of Apex Chambers’ criminal barristers are experienced in regulatory and health and safety matters. Nicholas Gedge recently represented a custody sergeant in disciplinary proceedings following a death in custody.

[back to top]


Further information on Apex Chambers (Chambers of Christopher Rees)

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Apex Chambers (Chambers of Christopher Rees) in other jurisdictions.

Regional Bar

Offices in Cardiff

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • HONESTY AND INVESTMENT FRAUD PROSECUTIONS

    How to build an investment fraud defence case that disproves prosecution allegations of dishonesty.
  • FRAUD, LARGE ORGANISATIONS AND THE INDIVIDUAL

    With a town council now officially facing a fraud investigation, we examine what individuals in such a large body should do if they come under suspicion.
  • The risks of liberation

    The dangers that pension liberation and money laundering pose to those involved in pension funds and management.
  • FIVE YEARS OF THE BRIBERY ACT

    What has been achieved since the introduction of the Act that was intended to tackle bribery in business?
  • FOREX AND RISK

    Five banks being fined £3.6 billion in the US for manipulating forex is a stark reminder of the legal risks involved in currency trading. Here, Aziz Rahman of Rahman Ravelli examines how the brokers and the traders in forex can avoid legal problems.
  • Foreign Intercepts

    FOREIGN INTERCEPTS
  • Finding the 
right words

    In the recent case of Newbury v Sun Microsystems [2013], the defendant argued that an offer to settle proceedings was ‘in principle' only and that a binding contract could not be formed until further terms had been agreed and a formal contract had been signed. It supported this argument by referring to a statement, in the offer letter, that the settlement was to be ‘recorded in a suitably worded agreement'. 

  • Behind the corporate veil: is that all there is?

    That companies have an existence entirely separate to that of their shareholders and directors is a foundational principle of English law and commerce.

  • Restoring environmental damage: putting a price on ecosystem services

    On 7 August 2009 a 40-inch pipeline ruptured, spilling 5,400 cubic metres of crude oil into the soil and groundwater of La Crau nature reserve in southern France, a habitat protected under French and European law. The operator had to excavate and replace 60,000 tons of soil, install 70 wells to pump and treat groundwater and 25 pumps to skim oil from surface water, at a cost in the region of €50m. However, this was just the primary remediation (that is, restoring the site to the state it would have been if the damage had not occurred). The operator was also required to compensate for the damage to the habitats and the loss of the ecosystem services that would otherwise have been provided by La Crau nature reserve. Measures included purchasing land outside of the nature reserve and contributing to its management for a period of 30 years (over €1m), monitoring the water table for 20 years (over €500,000), monitoring fauna over three years (€150,000) and rehabilitation in accordance with best available ecological techniques (nearly €2m). Overall, the compensatory restoration (to compensate for the amount of time that the ecosystem was impacted) and complimentary restoration (to compensate for elements of the ecosystem that had been permanently lost) came to more than €6.5m. 

  • The role of arbitrators in EU antitrust law

    In May 2014, it will be ten years since Regulation No 1/2003 entered into force. When the legislator of the European Union adopted this Regulation on 16 December 2002, its main objective was to decentralise the enforcement of the two main provisions of EU antitrust law, Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (now Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)). Where do the arbitrators fit in this picture?