The Legal 500

Doughty Street Chambers

53-54 DOUGHTY STREET, LONDON, WC1N 2LS, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7404 1313
Fax:
Fax 020 7404 2283
DX:
223 LONDON CHANCERY LANE
Web:
www.doughtystreet.co.uk
Email:
Manchester, London, Bristol

Kate Markus

Email:
Doughty Street Chambers ()

Position

Kate Markus has a public law and human rights practice encompassing a wide range of areas. She acts in cases involving the rights of children and vulnerable adults including community care, mental health (both judicial review and Court of Protection), health services and housing. She also acts in a variety of other public law cases including local government and community issues such as consultation rights and local service provision, and discrimination and equality duties. She has been involved in some of the leading control order cases, and is instructed in other terrorism cases: SIAC and financial sanctions. Recent cases include: RT v LT and A local authority (2010) 13 CCLR 580 (Court of Protection): capacity as to residence and contact; Secretary of State for the Home Department v AP (No 2) [2010] 1 WLR 1652 (Supreme Court): anonymity in control order proceedings; Secretary of State for the Home Department v AP [2010] 3 WLR 51 (Supreme Court): control order curfew; whether the overall effect of a 16 hour curfew and requirement to live 150 miles from home amounts to a deprivation of liberty; whether the personal circumstances of the individual or his family are relevant; R (B and others) v Worcestershire County Council [2010] 3 CCLR 13: closure of adult day care centres; consultation; irrationality; AE, AF, AM, AN v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] 2 WLR 423: use of closed material in control order proceedings; R (M) v Birmingham City Council [2009] 1 F.L.R. 1068: Residence order allowance: legality of local authority policy and of its application; R (Berry) v Cumbria County Council [2007] EWHC 3144 (Admin): Charging for day care centres; consultation; Secretary of State for the Home Department v MB [2008[ 1 AC 440: Use of closed material in control order proceedings under the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005; application of and compatibility with article 6(1) ECHR. She was a founding director and Chair of the Public Law Project. Before joining Doughty Street Chambers she worked at Brent Community Law Centre and she was Chair of the Law Centres Federation for a number of years.

Career

Called 1981; Gray's Inn. Publications of note: Co-author of the quarterly review of developments in 'Public Law' published in 'Legal Action'; an editor of the 'Community Care Law Reports'.

Languages

Conversational French.

Member

Administrative Law Bar Association; Housing Law Practitioners Association; Discrimination Law Association.

Education

Manchester University (LLB)

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Jersey Royal Court considers measure of damages for dilapidations claims

    In the absence of any statutory provision in Jersey addressing how dilapidations claims are to be quantified, the Royal Court's decision in JSSL v Barclays has provided some much needed guidance, particularly in circumstances where there is an acceptance that works to redress dilapidations have not been and will not be carried out.
  • English Supreme Court rules on Mistake and Hastings Bass

    On 9 May 2013 the English Supreme Court handed down a unanimous judgment on the seminal cases of Pitt-v- Holt and Futter -v- Futter , with Lord Walker's valedictory judgment conclusively resolving the English position on the rule in Hastings Bass and rescission on the ground of mistake.
  • Getting the breaks

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • Product liability and dietary supplements

    Shook, Hardy & Bacon currently authors the Insurance section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • The calm before 
the storm: are 
you prepared for 
a dawn raid?

    WilmerHale currently authors the Fraud and Corporate Crime section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here .
  • International shipment of waste: transporters beware

    Burges Salmon LLP currently authors the Environment and Energy section of The In-House Lawyer magazine. For more information and articles from this author click here
  • Cyprus Shipping Industry : Business as usual. Why despite recent events Cyprus remains an internatio

    Cyprus is the third most populated island in the Mediterranean Sea. It is strategically located at the crossroads of Europe, Africa and the Middle East. Traditionally Cyprus has always been at the heart of the seafaring trade and therefore always functioned as an important centre for trade and commerce. Today as a member of the European Union it remains an optimal business base. It is one of the most attractive locations for foreign investments worldwide. Foreign companies have been given the opportunity to invest and establish business in Cyprus on equal terms with local investors as no distinction is made between foreign and Cypriot companies.
  • FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPERATIONS

    The excellent support system in combination with the ideal jurisdiction provided in Cyprus set the country in the list of the most desirable countries through which you can offer foreign exchange operations. In addition, the accession of Cyprus within the European Union and, most importantly, the extremely beneficial economic advantages available due to the low costs and the outstanding taxation, create a covetable environment for foreign investors.
  • National public order. Adoption of the Draft

    The Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation (hereinafter - SCC RF) adopted by the Informative Letter No. 156 dated the 26th of February, 2013 (hereinafter - the Informative Letter) on Review of the consideration by arbitrazh courts of the cases on the implementation of the public order clause as the ground for rejection of the recognition and enforcement of the foreign court decisions and arbitral awards.
  • China Customs New Interpretation

    For many products, tariff classification can be technically complex, confusing, and subject to multiple interpretations. Often several different Harmonized System Codes ("HS Code") may seem applicable for one given product with different tariff rates. Tariff classification is indeed a process of application of customs classification rules, including customs rulings and decisions, and misclassification may trigger severe legal consequences. The sad fact is, unfortunately, that many companies rely on non-legal professionals to determine the HS Codes for imports or exports. A recent interpretation issued by the General Administration of Customs of China ("GACC") (Circular No. [2012] 495 Shu-Fa-Fa) (the "Interpretation") reinforces the process of tariff classification as a legal matter, and formulates the test as to what counts for regulatory violation if tariff classification rules are improperly applied by the importer or exporter in a given case. If the legal defense is successful, misclassification may only be treated as a non-violation misclassification, with the possible obligation to pay up additional customs duties, if any, but without administrative or criminal consequences. The Interpretation took effect as from February 1, 2013.