- Latin America
- United Kingdom - Solicitors
- United Kingdom - The Bar
- United States
- What is the GC Powerlist?
- How to nominate in-house counsel
- Australia/New Zealand
- Asia Pacific
- Latin America
- Middle East
- United Kingdom
- United Kingdom Teams
- United Kingdom - Rising Stars
- United States
- United States - Rising Stars
- United States Teams
- Client Intelligence Report
- Up in the air
- Bridging the Gulf
- Litigation and regulatory challenges in financial services
- AI and the law tools of tomorrow
- Scottish GCs
- North West clients
- Pan-Europe bribery crackdown
- Arbitration backing Africa's investment boom
- Gaining access to North Africa
- Anti-corruption in Asia
- Business thinking
- In-house management
- Career path
- Legal perspective
- Big picture
- In discussion
- Interrogating value
- GC interviews
- Our great leader: unravelling the process of choosing the right candidate for the top job
- The promised land? Big data and
the in-house lawyer
- Law: a risky business?
- Playing to your strengths: building diversity of thought into business
US Special Edition Downloadable PDF
- Dissenting perspectives
- Developments in Panama
- The international arbitration summit
- The Global 100 debate - Chasing Alpha
- Cyber security
- North Africa - through the gate
- North West Clients
- Scottish GCs
- The Global London debate
- Law firm leaders
- Cyber in-security
- Legal Business commercial litigation summit
- Funding disputes
- GC Powerlist roundtable - Germany
- GC roundtable - talent management
- GC Powerlist roundtable - Brazil
Search News and Articles
Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
Among other things, the recent amendment to the Environmental Impact Assessment Act has broadened the rights of (what is termed) the "affected public". The affected public consists primarily of various citizens' initiatives pursuing environmental or public-health purposes. It may for instance file an appeal against a negative decision at the screening stage (i.e., a decision according to which the given project does not require the issuance of an EIA report), and seek its annulment in court. The affected public has been granted a stronger voice also in subsequent procedures in which the fate of a building project is being decided: zoning proceedings and the proceedings on the issuance of a building permit. Taken together, these legislative changes may make it more difficult to implement projects which require an EIA report; in particular, the length of permission proceedings may be substantially extended.
On June 13, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) published the names of those who have applied for a new top level domain the ending of which may be geographic, such as "munich", industry identification such as "insurance" and even all trademark names and company descriptions such as "canon" and "adidas".- Noerr
ECJ, decision of February 16th, 2012, ref. C-360/10 – SABAM
For the second time within a short period of time, the non-governmental organisations right to challenge administrative decisions under German law is going to be subject to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). In January 2012, the German Supreme Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht) referred a case to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling concerning the NGO’s right of action.
The fundamental advice for international business transactions is obvious and easy to understand: different countries have different laws, business habits and cultures. These differences may range from minor nuances, such as lengthy French business lunches or unusual Spanish office hours, to significant legal roadblocks, such as strict European employment laws.
Parties to rental contracts for commercial premises often agree priority rental rights. In practice, this concept is used to cover a whole series of legal structures. These range from fixed options for the tenant to a promise made by the landlord as a business policy that if any additional premises become available, they will be offered to the tenant. In 2010 the Berlin Court of Appeal issued a ruling on such priority rental rights in insolvency; the decision has recently been published.- SIBETH
The EU Rome I Regulation (593/2008) of the European Parliament and of the Council came into force on 17 December 2009 (Convention). The Convention sets rules to determine the (national) law applicable to contractual obligations in civil and commercial matters. This Regulation replaces the 1980 Rome Convention and is especially relevant to cross-border businesses. The intention of the Convention is to provide legal certainty in cases where the parties have not expressly chosen the applicable law governing their contract.
According to a judgment of the German Federal Supreme Court from February 2010, the general assembly (Hauptversammlung) of a stock corporation (“Corporation”) may resolve to include a provision in its articles of association which comprehensively empowers the chairman to reasonably restrict the time available to shareholders to debate during the shareholder’s meeting.
Further to the Myriad decision from the United States (see part 1 of this blog), a European Court of Justice (ECJ) decision from July 2010 demonstrates another potentially significant setback to the validity and enforceability of patents directed to DNA sequences.
2010 may turn out to be a challenging year for applicants and attorneys in the field of biotech patents, especially when it comes to protecting or enforcing existing rights over your favourite stretch of DNA. Recent legal decisions on the patentability and enforceability of biotech patents have produced significant uncertainty regarding what kind of protection remains for product and method claims directed towards DNA sequences.