The Legal 500

Venezuela

Editorial

Legal market overview

It has been over a year since the death of Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez and the appointment of his successor Nicolás Maduro, yet Venezuela remains at an impasse. The hope that Maduro’s election win might usher in a more business-friendly environment is a distant memory; despite the country’s vast oil resources, new investors remain in short supply. The country has experienced a wave of protests as Venezuelans contend with rampant crime, high inflation and food shortages.

Venezuela’s upheaval has also impacted the legal market, with many lawyers unable to reach their offices during the worst of the demonstrations in early 2014. Nonetheless, Venezuela’s practitioners are compensating for the dearth of transactional activity by advising on an array of administrative issues across an increasingly broad array of regulated industries, as well as litigation and ongoing arbitral matters arising from the numerous state expropriations that occurred during the Chávez era. Although the country’s competition authority has been inactive in recent years – owing largely to the deputy Superintendent post being vacant and M&A deals being reviewed on a voluntary basis – Venezuela’s competition law practices remain active with compliance work.

Baker & McKenzie SC, D’Empaire Reyna Abogados and Norton Rose Fulbright all dominate on the transactional as well as contentious front, while global practice Despacho de Abogados Miembro de Hogan Lovells has an active banking and finance deal pipeline. Other strong domestic law firms include frontrunner Hoet Peláez Castillo & Duque, Mendoza Palacios Acedo Borjas Páez Pumar & Cía, Rodner, Martínez & Asociados, Tinoco, Travieso, Planchart & Núñez and Travieso Evans Arria Rengel & Paz.

Although international firms like Baker & McKenzie SC field strong intellectual property teams, the IP legal market is dominated by specialist local practices such as Estudio Antequera Parilli & Rodríguez, Bentata Abogados, Bolet & Terrero, and De Sola, Pate & Brown. Markven Propiedad Intelectual S.C. and Marquez, Henriquez, Ortin & Valedon also have impressive teams.

In light of the difficult times Venezuela is experiencing, it is unsurprising that few law firms are investing in lateral partner hires, or that spin-offs and new firm launches are few and far between. Notable exceptions include specialist employment law firm LABOR – Gestión de Gente, which was founded in June 2013 by former head of employment at Palacios, Torres, Crespo & Korody, Carlos Rivera Salazar; and Hoet Peláez Castillo & Duque, whose labour law team more than doubled in size during 2013 with the incorporation of seven employment experts from boutique law firm Mangieri Benavente & Asociados. Indeed Hoet Peláez has adopted a strategy of staffing to deal with the exigencies of the current political climate and has also grown its administrative capability.

Internal promotions saw Norton Rose Fulbright’s civil and commercial litigation associate Pedro Saghy promoted to of counsel in 2013, while at Hoet Peláez Castillo & Duque, IP expert Alicia Molero was made-up to partner. In other key developments, Baker & McKenzie SC’s Diego Bustillos (formerly a leading individual for intellectual property) retired from the practice.

Press releases

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Update on EU Sanctions against Russia

    On 6 December 2014, Council Regulation (EU) No 1290/2014 entered into force. This regulation is the latest in a series of regulations regarding "sectoral sanctions" against Russia.
  • Slovakia: Checkmate? New law regulates protection of employees when blowing the whistle

    So far, in Slovakia there has not been in force any regulation specifically addressing whistleblowing situations in which employees report wrongdoings, such as the commission of a crime which they learnt about in connection with the performance of their employment, work or function. Certain partial aspects related to whistleblowing have been regulated by the country's data protection, criminal and labour laws. read more
  • Croatia: A look at the Strategic Investment Projects Act One Year after Implementation

    Croatia's sixth consecutive year of recession
  • AT: Transparency International – Release of 20th annual Corruption Perceptions Index

    On 3 December 2014, Transparency International, the leading civil society organisation fighting corruption worldwide, released its 20th annual Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI). The index draws on surveys covering the views of business people, provides expert assessments, and ranks 175 countries by the perceived levels of corruption in their public sectors. The scale ranges from 0 (perceived to be highly corrupt) to 100 (perceived to be very clean). The CPI can be found under the following link .  read more...
  • Review of the Constitutional Court Decision on the Cancellation of Article 42/1 (C) of Law No. 556

    Introduction
  • Transfer and Granting of Rights under Turkish Petroleum Law: Freedom of Contract versus Regulatory R

    Especially after the drop in oil prices the companies that are in early stage of their investments have begun to get position aiming to turn into an advantageous investment and started to look to what extent the regulations allow them to transfer and grant their rights under Turkish Petroleum Law. This may be deemed also as an exit strategy for some from operational perspective as it parallels with the tendency around the world and has direct relation with oil prices. 
  • Contracting the Petroleum Operations under Turkish Petroleum Law: Scope and Limits of Liability on P

    As exception to liberty of contracting and unlike a number of other industries, Turkey's petroleum industry imposes certain obligations to petroleum right owners in contracting the conduct of the petroleum operations.  At the first glance this seems that it aims to strengthen the management of hazards by enhancing the safety however the liability imposed to petroleum right owners in case of contracting the operations still remains unclear in terms of limitation.
  • Liabilities of Primary Employer and Subcontractors in case of a Collusive Contract

    Growing economy and competitive environment in Turkey has been leading companies to seek more profitable ways to conduct their business. Therefore companies have chosen to engage in subcontracts for the purpose of reducing their costs. Yet, to serve such purpose, at some point companies have started utilizing subcontracts to limit employees' entitlements through collusive contracts. Labor Law numbered 4857 (the " Labor Law ") and Bylaw on Subcontractor dated September 27, 2008 (the " Bylaw ") regulate which services or works may be subcontracted and strictly prohibit collusive contracts. According to Article 2/7 of the Labor Law, a collusive subcontract is considered null and void. Such nullity of subcontract automatically results in primary employers being redefined as main and sole employers of employees assigned to subcontracted work. Consequently, primary employers are solely responsible for employees' rights arising from subcontracted works and technically, primary employers would not have the option to recourse to subcontractors in order to claim any compensation due to their sole responsibility.
  • Boundaries of the Turkish Competition Authority’s Investigative Powers

    Boundaries of the Turkish Competition Authority's Investigative Powers: Case Handlers vs. Personal Property
  • Potential Consequences of Acquisitions of Minority Shareholdings under Turkish Competition Law

    The acquisition of a minority shareholding may come under the Turkish Competition Authority's (" Authority ") scrutiny in two ways, mainly: 1) it may result in de facto or de jure sole or joint control, depending on the rights possessed by the minority shareholders and/or shareholding structures and past voting patterns; and 2) it may not result in control but in cross-shareholding structures amongst competitors in a concentrated market which may raise questions about coordinated effects. This article discusses the circumstances under which the abovementioned consequences may arise under Turkish competition law with references to the relevant legislation and the most noteworthy cases in this regard.

Press Releases worldwide

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to