The Legal 500

Ukraine > Tax

Editorial sections

Other

All countries

Index of tables

  1. Tax
  2. Leading individuals

Leading individuals

KM Partners is ‘highly professional and always timely’. Alexander Minin and Alexander Shemiatkin are ‘la crème de la crème’. The firm has a comprehensive tax advisory and litigation practice, and advised on over 200 tax matters last year, including representing multinationals in complex disputes.

Ulysses’ broad practice handles complex transactional matters such as corporate restructuring and cross-border investment, and high-value disputes including the largest ever customs value and transfer pricing case in Ukraine. It provides ‘high-quality advice and value for money’. In particular, Oleh Marchenko is ‘flexible’ and ‘delivers on commitments’, and Olena Voznyuk has ‘deep knowledge and a proactive approach’. The team advised INN on tax structuring of its investment into a five-star hotel development.

Arzinger is highly recommended for tax disputes and advisory work, thanks to Pavlo Khodakovsky, Sergiy Shkylar and Wolfram Rehbock. Recently it advised a leading pharmaceuticals company on tax-efficient structures.

Asters is ‘highly professional with a deep knowledge of market practice’, and the firm advised Ukrainian National Lottery on tax issues. Oleksiy Didkovskiy, Vadym Samoilenko and Constantin Solyar provide ‘comprehensive analysis, and have deep expertise and experience’.

Baker & McKenzie – CIS, Limited is ‘one of the smartest and most adaptable firms’. Hennadiy Voytsitskyi’s team includes Yuriy Zalusky, who is ‘a real asset; very strong on litigation’. The firm advises leading companies in sectors such as technology and financial services.

DLA Piper Ukraine LLC’s Illya Sverdlov and recently promoted partner Svitlana Musienko are highly recommended. Regular clients for tax advisory work include ENI, Sanofi Aventis, Wrigley and Avon.

Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners is recommended for tax disputes and pre-litigation advice.

Integrites is ‘on a par with some of the best’, particularly in tax disputes. Natalia Tomashevskaya’s team advised a large metallurgical corporation on a $44m dispute.

Konnov & Sozanovsky’s Yevgeniya Derbal is highly recommended for tax planning and disputes.

Andrey Pronchenko heads the practice at PricewaterhouseCoopers, which is ‘competitive and client-oriented’. Its large team of associates is ‘highly appreciated and responsible’. Clients include large international agribusinesses.

One of the best law firms in Ukraine’, Sayenko Kharenko brings the vast experience of Michael Kharenko to bear on transactional matters. The team advised Kimberly-Clark on VAT issues.

CMS’ Graham Conlon and Anna Pogrebna handle tax advisory work for clients including ENI and Soufflet Group.

Dentons’ Igor Davidenko advises clients such as Herbalife and Marriott International.

Gide Loyrette Nouel’s Taras Koval is recommended for his advice to French multinationals and international energy companies in transactional matters and disputes.

Gvozdiy & Oberkovych Law Firm’s Valentyn Gvozdiy is a renowned tax expert and head of the Ukrainian Bar Association’s tax committee.

Litigator Roman Marchenko and advisory specialist Maksym Kopeychykov at Ilyashev & Partners are highly recommended. The team recently represented Poltava Petroleum in a $11.4m dispute.

LCF Law Group has ‘highly skilled experts with a high level of experience and knowledge’. Anna Ogrenchuk and Artem Stoianov are ‘very diplomatic and always safeguard their clients’ interests’. The team recently acted for Vikoil in a $10m tax dispute.

Lavrynovych & Partners has an excellent record in tax disputes, and ‘knows what a deadline means’. Iryna Marushko, who is recommended, recently represented Energoterra. Igor Siusel leeft the firm.

Law Firm Paritet’s Olena Tkachenko advised a large dairy export company on tax mitigation pertaining to a $15m syndicated loan.

Peterka & Partners LLC’s clients include PSA Peugeot Citroen and a well-known French fashion house.

Vasil Kisil & Partners’ Denis Lysenko advised Thomson Reuters on tax risk management and a leading Ukrainian retail group on VAT issues.

Beiten Burkhardt’s Julian Ries represented Porsche Leasing in litigation with the tax authorities and advised a US-based travel operator on the tax implications of operating tours in Ukraine.

Cai & Lenard provides ‘great service, quick response times and high-quality advice’. Konstantin Pilkov, formerly of Lavrynovych & Partners, is ‘completely devoted to his work’. He represented Whirlpool Ukraine in a UAH2.7m dispute with the state tax inspection service.

Gramatskiy and Partners’ advice is ‘always timely and tailor-made’. Yuri Zabiyaka is ‘a remarkable lawyer’ with ‘outstanding understanding of tax regulation’. He acted for Lesenergomontazh in a £1.2m dispute.

Jurimex Legal Solutions has ‘deep knowledge and broad experience’. Danil Getmantsev is ‘one of the most recognised tax lawyers in Ukraine’, and Kateryna Muraviova and Vita Forsiuk are also recommended. Recent instructions include handling a UAH4m dispute for TVI.

SDM Partners Law FIrm is ‘very strong’ on tax matters and ‘very professional’. Mykola Melnyk recently advised a large multinational food producer on tax audits and tax planning.

Press releases

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to

Legal Developments in Ukraine for Tax

  • Ukraine Introduces Tax Incentives for IT Industry

    On 5 July 2012, the Parliament of Ukraine adopted the Law Of Ukraine “On Amending Section XX “Transitional Provisions” of the Tax Code of Ukraine on Peculiarities of Taxation of Software Companies” (the “Law”). The Law came into force on 3 August 2012. The tax incentives introduced by the Law provide for a very favourable tax regime for companies operating in the IT industry and are likely to be widely used by national and international businesses. Below we provide the brief description of the incentives introduced by the Law.
    - Avellum Partners

Legal Developments in Ukraine

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Disputes arising from finance arrangements: post-crisis phenomenon in Ukraine – read more!

    The 2008 financial crisis peak had hardly faded away, when another breaking news was brought to the surface in CIS countries: a significant part of the funds advanced during the pre-crisis period by banks and other financial institutions to support various businesses and commercial initiatives, flew beyond national frontiers to be found in Panama, BVI, Seychelles, Jersey, Cyprus and other offshore and onshore jurisdictions in the pockets of numerous private persons, mostly CIS nationals. No surprise this fact led to a tsunami of disputes, one way or the other related to repayment of loans and funds advanced under other types of finance arrangements. Many of those disputes are still pending, thus, keeping finance arrangements among the top-litigated issues within CIS borders.
  • Proper notices in arbitration – watch the details!

    Article V1(b) of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, better known as the New York Convention, provides that recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitral award may be refused, at the request of the party against which it is invoked, only if that party furnishes proof to the competent authority where the recognition and enforcement is sought that it was not given proper notice of the appointment of the arbitrator or of the arbitration proceedings. However simple at first glance, the question of what constitutes 'proper notice' turns out to be less than clear in practice.
  • The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Real Estate 2013. Chapter 38: Ukraine

    This guide provides the international practitioner and in-house counsel with a comprehensive worldwide legal analysis of the laws and regulations of real estate. This article appeared in the 2013 edition of The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Real Estate; published by Global Legal Group Ltd, London. www.iclg.co.uk )
  • Is the Door to England Still That Wide Open for CIS Disputes?

    6 February has marked lawyers’ calendars with an important message from the UK Supreme Court: English courts will not accept the jurisdiction over a dispute having the “centre of gravity” in another country. AstapovLawyers' Managing Partner Andrey Astapov and Associate Anna Kombikova comment on a recent CIS precedent.
  • Time limit for forwarding arbitral award to parties extended

    The Presidium of the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (UCCI) recently amended Article 52 of the Rules of the International Commercial Arbitration Court (ICAC) at the UCCI. This article governs the procedure for forwarding an arbitral award to the parties to arbitration proceedings.
  • Enforcing arbitral awards against Ukrainian bankrupt companies

    Eugene Blinov and Anna Kombikova of AstapovLawyers ILG commented on peculiarities of enforcement of arbitral awards against Ukrainian bankrupt companies. The lawyers noted the risks connected with such cases and suggested possible solutions.
  • Ukraine: National Bank incredibly fast in implementing its new power

    On 6 November 2012, the Ukrainian Parliament adopted changes to the Law of Ukraine "On the Procedure of Carrying-Out Settlements in Foreign Currency", dated 23 September 2004, No. 185/94-BP, as amended, granting the National Bank of Ukraine ("NBU") a power to amend for a term of up to six months the term for cre-diting to the exporters' accounts of currency proceeds under export contracts. These changes to the law entered into force on 17 November 2012. The NBU was extremely fast to implement its new power, passing a Resolution dated 16 November 2012, No. 475 (which entered into force on 19 November 2012).
  • Mitigation of damages in arbitration practice: trite law or space for creativity?

    The mitigation of damages is a well-known principle in international legal practice. However, in Ukraine there is no widely applied court and arbitration practice on the issues relating to mitigation of damages, and aggrieved parties may be unclear as to what should and can be done.
  • Ukraine enables itself to furnish procedural orders of foreign judicial and arbitral authorities

    The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine at its meeting on August 29 resolved [1] to amend its Resolution "On approval of the Order for the use of funds allocated in the state budget for payments related to implementation of judgments of foreign jurisdictional authorities rendered upon consideration of matters against Ukraine" (the "Government Resolution").[2] Appropriate amendments were prepared by the Ministry of Justice (responsible for protecting the state's interests in foreign courts and arbitral tribunals) in order to improve mechanisms to protect the rights and interests of Ukraine in foreign judicial and arbitral proceedings.
  • Ukrainian district court allowed attachment of property located in Ukraine on the basis of UK proced

    On 1 June 2012 Goloseevskiy district court of Kyiv city rendered a decision whereby it recognized and enforced the Order of the High Court of Justice Queen Bench Division Commercial Court (Order). As a result, Ukrainian court allowed attachment of Debtor’s assets located in Ukraine.

Press Releases in Ukraine

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to