Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Ukraine > Tax > Law firm and leading lawyer rankings


Index of tables

  1. Tax
  2. Leading individuals
  3. Next generation lawyers

Leading individuals

  1. 1

Next generation lawyers

  1. 1

At Baker McKenzie, Kyiv Office, Hennadiy Voytsitskyi has ‘a practical approach and good technical knowledge’. Counsel Yuriy Zaluskyy is also recommended. Erste Group and Arcelor Mittal are clients.

At Egorov Puginsky Afanasiev & Partners, litigator Arsen Miliutin ‘shows great skill and experience’, and Oleksandr Maydanyk handles advisory work. Clients include IBRC.

KM Partnershas some of the country’s leading tax lawyers’, including Ivan Shynkarenko and the ‘committed and flexibleAlexander Minin. Alexander Shemiatkin represented a subsidiary of an international household goods company in a customs charge dispute.

PwC Legal stands out for its tax litigation expertise. Alexander Protsyuk represented Oriflame and senior associate Zhanna Brazhnyk led a team acting for Cogniance in respective disputes with tax authorities.

Vasil Kisil & Partners’ Andriy Stelmashchuk, who ‘looks at all the angles and makes well-balanced decisions’, represented a Ukrainian real estate company in a $480,000 VAT dispute.

Aequo’s ‘well-resourced team provides clear advice’. Denis Lysenko assisted private port TIS Group with tax structuring for a share sale. Yulia Kyrpa advised the EBRD on tax and customs issues.

Arzinger’s team is strong in litigation. ‘Patient and knowledgeable’ Pavlo Khodakovsky assisted a pharmaceuticals company with a review of tax and antitrust risks.

Asters exhibits ‘an analytical approach and practical knowledge’. Oleksiy Didkovskiy and the ‘insightfulAlexey Khomyakov are recommended. Recent work includes advising ED&F Man on tax and customs matters.

Mykola Stetsenko’s team at Avellum provides ‘to-the-point and well-prepared’ advice. The firm assisted Ukraine’s Ministry of Finance on tax code changes resulting from its $18bn issuance of securities.

At DLA Piper Ukraine LLC head of tax Svitlana Musienko is well versed in domestic and international tax planning and investment structuring. Musienko and Illya Sverdlov advised shareholders of Ukrainian company Pharma Start LLC on the tax aspects of their sale of their entire holding to Acino Pharma.

Dentons represented an international crop protection company in tax-related litigation. Igor Davydenko, Ihor Mehedynyuk and associate Tetiana Gryn are recommended.

Eterna Law provides ‘innovative and tailored solutions’ and clients include a leading European fashion brand. Oksana Kneychuk is ‘competent and thorough’.

ICF Legal Service is ‘a reliable partner’. Natalya Ulyanova acted for Megainpharm during a €2.5m tax, transfer pricing and VAT dispute.

Litigator and practice head Roman Marchenko at Ilyashev & Partners represented shipyard FSC More in a $2m tax dispute. Galina Melnik is a ‘trusted adviser’.

At Integrites, Oleksiy Feliv and Denys Kytsenko are experts in tax litigation. Vyacheslav Korchev advised Palma Group on the tax aspects of its $115m corporate restructuring.

International Legal Center EUCon’s team of ‘experienced professionals’ includes managing partner Yaroslav Romanchuk, who advised SavikShusterStudio on cancellation of tax notices.

LCF Law Group’s team represented Uzinsky Sugar Plant in a $52m tax liability dispute. Anna Ogrenchuk and Olena Volyanska have ‘perfect knowledge of tax law’, and Artem Stoyanov is also recommended.

Lexwell & Partners’ ‘well-respected team’ is representing the government of Ukraine in a $300m international tax dispute. Igor Nagai and Tatiana Kolga ‘get to the heart of the matter’.

Marchenko Danevych acted for a Fortune 500 corporation and its former Ukrainian subsidiary in multimillion-dollar disputes. Oleh Marchenko is a highly regarded tax litigator.

Moris Group represented military hardware conglomerate Ukroboronprom in a $1.3m case concerning cancellation of financial inspection notices. Volodymyr Rak is the key name.

The ‘dynamic and efficient’ team at Oleksandr Peremezhko & Partners includes Oleksandr Peremezhko, who has ‘excellent court skills’, and the ‘diligentNatalia Troinich. Highlights included representing film production company B&H in a $3m dispute.

Serhiy Verlanov is the key name at Sayenko Kharenko, which ‘moves smoothly between advisory and contentious work’. Clients include BTG Pactual.

At allTax, Artem Sereda and Victor Sereda, who ‘have the practical expertise to lead any case’, handled a $200,000 tax dispute for a Ukrainian import-export company.

At CMS, Anna Pogrebna is ‘a highly valued adviser’ and Olexander Martinenko is also recommended. Clients include the EBRD.

EY Law’s Vladimir Kotenko advised Altran on issues arising from its acquisition of software company Lohika. Igor Chufarov is a transfer pricing expert.

FCLex Law Firm’s team represented Azovmash in 30 tax disputes totalling $220m in value. Sergiy Chuyev is the practice head.

GOLaw’s Valentyn Gvozdiy represented Vortex Group in a €29m tax dispute.

Jurimex Legal Solutions advised lottery company MSL on tax structuring. Danylo Getmantsev and Vita Forsiuk are the key names.

KPD Consulting Law Firm provides ‘a high level of service’ and Vitaliy Patsyuk is the key name. Clients include Laggar.

KPMG’s Oleg Chayka advised the subsidiary of an international software company on the tax implications of a corporate restructuring.

SDM Partners LLC has experienced practitioners in Dmytro Syrota, Ilya Soykis and Mykola Melnyk. The firm represented an international medical group in a €28m tax dispute.

SKG Attorneys at law’s Olga Solovyova represented UkrSibbank BNP Paribas Group in tax disputes.

The ‘highly effective’ team at Sokolovskyi and Partners Law Firm acts for clients such as Mirelle. Vladyslav Sokolovskyi and Tetiana Lysovets ‘adopt professional approaches to new challenges’.

Interview with...

Law firm partners and practice heads explain how their firms are adapting to clients' changing needs

International comparative guides

Giving the in-house community greater insight to the law and regulations in different jurisdictions.

Select Practice Area

GC Powerlist -

Press releases

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to

Legal Developments in Ukraine for Tax

  • Ukraine Introduces Tax Incentives for IT Industry

    On 5 July 2012, the Parliament of Ukraine adopted the Law Of Ukraine “On Amending Section XX “Transitional Provisions” of the Tax Code of Ukraine on Peculiarities of Taxation of Software Companies” (the “Law”). The Law came into force on 3 August 2012. The tax incentives introduced by the Law provide for a very favourable tax regime for companies operating in the IT industry and are likely to be widely used by national and international businesses. Below we provide the brief description of the incentives introduced by the Law.
    - Avellum Partners

Legal Developments in Ukraine

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • A Remarkable Year of Restructuring. What Next?

    What happened in 2015 in the world of Ukrainian corporate finance was a reflection of larger scale events in and around Ukraine. In this article, we will share our view of the key events in 2015 in the area of cor-porate finance, highlight the most important legislative and regulatory developments in finance and, based on our experience, make a few suggestions for creditors and debtors on how to navigate through 2016.
  • Enforcement in Ukraine of Interim Orders Issued by Foreign Courts and Arbitral Tribunals

    In the past few years Ukrainian clients have developed an appetite for solving their disputes abroad. Litigation and arbitration sagas involving Ukrainian parties or related to Ukrainian assets often spread across many jurisdictions. In many such sagas various interim reliefs were granted by courts and tribunals.
  • Applicable law in contractual disputes: recent arbitration practice

    AstapovLawyers Partner Eugene Blinov & the firm's Associate Roman Protsyshyn share their recent arbitration practice regarding applicable law in contractual disputes.
  • Disputes arising from finance arrangements: post-crisis phenomenon in Ukraine – read more!

    The 2008 financial crisis peak had hardly faded away, when another breaking news was brought to the surface in CIS countries: a significant part of the funds advanced during the pre-crisis period by banks and other financial institutions to support various businesses and commercial initiatives, flew beyond national frontiers to be found in Panama, BVI, Seychelles, Jersey, Cyprus and other offshore and onshore jurisdictions in the pockets of numerous private persons, mostly CIS nationals. No surprise this fact led to a tsunami of disputes, one way or the other related to repayment of loans and funds advanced under other types of finance arrangements. Many of those disputes are still pending, thus, keeping finance arrangements among the top-litigated issues within CIS borders.
  • Proper notices in arbitration – watch the details!

    Article V1(b) of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, better known as the New York Convention, provides that recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitral award may be refused, at the request of the party against which it is invoked, only if that party furnishes proof to the competent authority where the recognition and enforcement is sought that it was not given proper notice of the appointment of the arbitrator or of the arbitration proceedings. However simple at first glance, the question of what constitutes 'proper notice' turns out to be less than clear in practice.
  • Is the Door to England Still That Wide Open for CIS Disputes?

    6 February has marked lawyers’ calendars with an important message from the UK Supreme Court: English courts will not accept the jurisdiction over a dispute having the “centre of gravity” in another country. AstapovLawyers' Managing Partner Andrey Astapov and Associate Anna Kombikova comment on a recent CIS precedent.
  • Time limit for forwarding arbitral award to parties extended

    The Presidium of the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (UCCI) recently amended Article 52 of the Rules of the International Commercial Arbitration Court (ICAC) at the UCCI. This article governs the procedure for forwarding an arbitral award to the parties to arbitration proceedings.
  • Enforcing arbitral awards against Ukrainian bankrupt companies

    Eugene Blinov and Anna Kombikova of AstapovLawyers ILG commented on peculiarities of enforcement of arbitral awards against Ukrainian bankrupt companies. The lawyers noted the risks connected with such cases and suggested possible solutions.
  • Mitigation of damages in arbitration practice: trite law or space for creativity?

    The mitigation of damages is a well-known principle in international legal practice. However, in Ukraine there is no widely applied court and arbitration practice on the issues relating to mitigation of damages, and aggrieved parties may be unclear as to what should and can be done.
  • Ukraine enables itself to furnish procedural orders of foreign judicial and arbitral authorities

    The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine at its meeting on August 29 resolved [1] to amend its Resolution "On approval of the Order for the use of funds allocated in the state budget for payments related to implementation of judgments of foreign jurisdictional authorities rendered upon consideration of matters against Ukraine" (the "Government Resolution").[2] Appropriate amendments were prepared by the Ministry of Justice (responsible for protecting the state's interests in foreign courts and arbitral tribunals) in order to improve mechanisms to protect the rights and interests of Ukraine in foreign judicial and arbitral proceedings.

Press Releases in Ukraine

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to