The Legal 500

Editorial sections

Other

All countries

Other countries

Recently viewed firm rankings

The Legal 500 The Legal 500
The Legal 500 The Legal 500

Recently viewed firm profiles

"Wolf Theiss opened its first office in Vienna in 1957 and soon established a reputation as one of Austria’s leading law firms. The firm has since grown into a multinational team of over 600 people, around 300 of whom are lawyers. It has offices* in Albania, Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, B..." read more
"PRK Partners/Bellák is part of the leading independent firm PRK Partners, which comprises 130 professionals, managed by senior lawyers with extensive transactional and regulatory experience gained at leading international law firms in Budapest, Prague, New York and London. The firm offers an..." read more

Overview

Hungary’s once-buoyant economy is now overshadowed by the global economic downturn. The government had already introduced austerity measures to bring its budget under control and enable it to join the euro in due course, but in 2008 it was forced to turn to the IMF for a loan.

International law firms first came to Hungary during the privatisations of the 1990s and, for some, the Central European country remains significant. Budapest, as capital, is a convenient base from which to handle investment into the Balkans as well as Russia and the Ukraine. International firms represented in Budapest include London firms Morley Allen & Overy Iroda, Köves Clifford Chance and CMS Cameron McKenna LLP, as well as US firms Réczicza White & Case LLP, Martonyi és Kajtár Baker & McKenzie, and Siegler Law Office/Weil, Gotshal & Manges. Large continental European firms with offices in Budapest include Germany’s Radnóczy & Mészáros Nörr Stiefenhofer Lutz and France’s Gide Loyrette Nouel – Ferenczy.

Offices across Central Europe are no longer a priority for some others, however. Most recently, Magic Circle firms Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, in 2007, and Linklaters, in 2008, left the country. Both firms continue to work closely with
their former legal offices, which now operate as 

domestic law firms, respectively Oppenheim and Andrékó Kinstellar. So far it seems both offices, which are staffed as before, have continued to attract the same level of clients. Arguably they will continue to do so for while some of the larger firms are pulling out, a new trend for purely regional networks capable of handling transactions across Central and Eastern Europe is evolving. One such is Andrékó Kinstellar: the former Linklaters offices in the region have formed a new network with offices in Bucharest, Bratislava and Prague. Other regional networks that have expanded into Budapest include Austrian firm Wolf Theiss, which last year opened under Zoltán Faludi, a former Köves Clifford Chance partner, as Faludi Wolf Theiss Ügyvédi Iroda / Attorneys at Law and Schönherr through its partnership with the former CHSH Cerha Hempel Spiegelfeld Hlawati team at Szécsényi Ügyvédi Iroda law firm. UK IP firm Bird & Bird is also following the trend, opening a regional network of four Central European offices including one in Budapest, Simándi Bird & Bird. The new network of PRK Partners/Bellák was created through the merger of Czech firm Procházka Randl Kubr and Hungary’s Bellák & Partners in September 2008. It has offices in Bratislava, Budapest and Prague.

Meanwhile, international clients are ever more willing to instruct local firms on their Hungarian domestic work as they look for better rates. Hungarian firms such as M&A boutique Forgó, Varga & Partners Law Firm and D&P (Dezsö & Partners) are benefiting, winning ever larger instructions from both international clients and from Hungarian corporates doing business across the region. Firms that can demonstrate a specialist capability are also benefiting on such transactions. That’s long been true for domestic litigators such as Péter Nagy at Nagy és Trócsányi, and András Szecskay of Szecskay Attorneys at Law; large IP firms such as Danubia, SBG & K Patent and Law Offices; and real estate firms include D&P (Dezsö & Partners); Kõvári, Tercsák Salans Ügyvédi Iroda and Szabo Kelemen & Partners Attorneys. However, many clients still demand international capability on cross-border transactions, and this may be where the new breed of regional networks will come into its own.

In the wake of the economic slowdown, restructuring work seems likely to increase and a new breed of clients is expected, as cash-rich investors such as private equity firms start to see opportunities in a deflated Central Eastern European market.

Press releases

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to

Legal Developments in Hungary

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • EC TRADE MARK LAW IN THE LIFE SCIENCES INDUSTRY AS EXEMPLIFIED BY THE CASE BAYERN INNOVATIV V OHIM

    This article tries to shed light on an important area of trade mark law in connection with a decision recently handed down by the European Court of First Instance (the "CFI"), more specifically with respect to the complex question of similarity between marks and confusion of the public. This question is naturally an issue of fact and evidence and is - to a large extent - imbued with subjectivity. Therefore, new cases brought before the courts always have to be assessed afresh, taking all the surrounding circumstances into consideration, and the outcome can at times be surprising, even for experienced trade mark lawyers.
    - Szecskay Attorneys at Law
  • HUNGARIAN DATA PROTECTION LAWS

    TRANSFER BY THE EMPLOYER OF EMPLOYEES' PERSONAL DATA TO THE US FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF HUNGARIAN DATA PROTECTION LAWS: In this article, we briefly address the issue of what requirements prescribed by Hungarian laws on data protection must be complied with by an employer that wishes to transfer the personal data of its employees to the United States.
    - Szecskay Attorneys at Law
  • THE "UNDERGROUND PARKING LOT CASE IN SOPRON"

    The Supreme Court's decision in this Sopron underground parking lot case has been one of the hottest topics in the legal playing field in the past few months. We briefly discuss the decision below, and describe a possible way to solve the problems it has raised.
    - Szecskay Attorneys at Law
  • Changes regarding the Standard Sectoral Classification of Economic Activities

    The Act XCVI of 2008 (hereinafter the: “Act”) on the amendment of Act V of 2006 on the Public Company Information, Company Registration and Winding-up Proceedings and on the modification of other statutes in respect to the publication of the annual report and the Sectoral Classification of Economic Activities entered into force on December 27, 2008.
    - Sándor Szegedi Szent-Ivány Komáromi Eversheds
  • On the amendment of the acts affecting the labour relations

    The main purpose of the amendment of several pieces of legislation affecting the arranged labour relations is to make the regulation simpler, and to make it more transparent and easier to apply. Most of the newly introduced provisions entered into force on 1 June 2009.
    - Sándor Szegedi Szent-Ivány Komáromi Eversheds
  • Regarding the deposition and publication of Annual Reports

    New provisions shall apply for the Annual Reports to be submitted after 1 May 2009. The new provisions are prescribed by Act XCVI of 2008 on the modification of the Company Registration Act on the deposition and publication of the Annual Reports submitted in compliance with the Accounting Act. The relevant provisions of Act XCII of 2003 on the Rules of Taxation were modified simultaneously. The purpose of the modifications is on the one hand that the submitted annual reports shall become public as soon as possible, on the other hand that a more effective control mechanism and sanctioning shall apply for the companies, which fail to submit their annual report.
    - Sándor Szegedi Szent-Ivány Komáromi Eversheds
  • Regarding the recent amendment of the Competition Act

    On March 23, 2009, the Hungarian Parliament passed the bill amending Act No. 57 of 1996 on the Prohibition of Unfair Trading Practices and Unfair Competition (hereinafter: “Competition Act”). The amendment entered into force on June 1, 2009, and affects the following areas:
    - Sándor Szegedi Szent-Ivány Komáromi Eversheds
  • Environment Law 2009: Hungary

    A practical insight to cross-border Environment Law
    - Oppenheim
  • Product Liability 2009: Hungary

    A practical insight to cross-border Product Liability work
    - Oppenheim
  • RECENT CHANGES TO EMPLOYMENT LEGISLATION

    RECENT CHANGES TO EMPLOYMENT LEGISLATIONIN HUNGARYby Prague / Bratislava / Budapest www.prkpartners.com Legislative changes concerning the Hungarian Labour Code and the rules pertaining to the protection of workers’ safety and health Effective as of January 1, 2009 significant legislative measures were adopted by the Hungarian Parliament concerning several labour-related issues. Specifically, the new Act, bearing the number LXI. of 2008, amended various provisions of Act XXII. of 1992 on the Hungarian Labour Code and the rules pertaining to the protection of workers’ safety and health governed by Act No. XCIII of 1993. The amendments serve two main purposes. By refining the implementation of the relevant EC Directives the amendments seek to introduce more flexible and market friendly provisions regarding annual leave, work on national holidays and also enhances the provisions relating to workers’ safety.
    - Bellák & Partners Law Office

Press releases

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to