Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon


Croatia > Law firm and leading lawyer rankings


Legal market overview

After six years of recession which eroded some 13% off the country’s output, Croatia experienced 1% growth in 2015. However, although foreign investment has picked up slightly, this may be viewed as a corollary of the country’s accession to the EU and the general marginal uplift of its economic mood. Zoran Milanović’s centre-left government has continued on a path of fiscal consolidation which was the hallmark of the previous government but high bureaucratic costs, uncompetitive highly leveraged companies and general uncertainty before impending elections resulted in a general unwillingness among foreign investors to invest in the country.

Therefore, on the corporate front – with the exception of one or two very large cross-border M&A deals (most notably, British American Tobacco’s acquisition of Adris Group’s retail and tobacco business) – law firms in the region have had to make do with relatively small mandates. Similarly, privatisation processes have come to a standstill, with the flag carrier Croatia Airways, railway cargo firm HZ and the last major state bank still awaiting buyers. One area of activity, however, has been in relation to debt recovery and many of the country’s major law firms have been involved in some manner for Austrian bank Hypo Alpe-Adria-Bank in relation to its winding down. This has largely taken the guise of acting for its wind-down company Heta Asset Resolution in its efforts to dispose of non-performing assets.

Several traditional heavyweight full-service law firms remain prominent across the majority of practice areas and these include Divjak, Topic & Bahtijarevic; Mamic Peric Reberski Rimac Law Firm LLC; Porobija & Porobija; Šavoric & Partners; and Žuric i Partneri. However, a number of effective younger challengers are emerging, many of which were set up by former senior associates or partners at these leading firms. Of these, since its foundation in September 2014, Kovacevic Prpic Simeunovic has made significant inroads in banking and finance, as well as corporate and M&A work. Other notable younger firms include Law Office Lacmanovic, which has handled a considerable quantity of work for Heta Asset Resolution; Law Office Krehic, Stanicic & Gricar, which has made significant inroads in the telecoms and media sector; and Ostermann & Partners LLP.

Several international law firms operate in the market through associations with locally qualified lawyers. Wolf Theiss – Zagreb branch maintains a significant presence, as does Local lawyers in cooperation with Karanović & Nikolić, which has a network of offices across the Balkan region. Bardek, Lisac, Mušec, Skoko in association with CMS Reich-Rohrwig Hainz Rechtsanwälte GmbH (Austria) and Schoenherr in cooperation with Croatian lawyers are also active in certain areas.

Local firm Law Firm Glinska & Miskovic Ltd is an associated member of the DLA Piper Group, while Bogdanovic, Dolicki & Partners has an association with Hogan Lovells International LLP.

Interview with...

Law firm partners and practice heads explain how their firms are adapting to clients' changing needs

International comparative guides

Giving the in-house community greater insight to the law and regulations in different jurisdictions.

Select Practice Area

GC Powerlist -

International comparative guides

Giving the in-house community greater insight to the law and regulations in different jurisdictions.

Select Practice Area

GC Powerlist -

Press releases

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to

Legal Developments in Croatia

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Implementing Regulations on Public Procurement

    On 1 January 2008 the new Public Procurement Act came into force. However, following the coming into force of the new Act the Public Procurement Office, a regulatory body authorized to develop and coordinate the public procurement system in Croatia reported that in the practice the new Act is actually suspended until the regulations necessary for its implementation are adopted.
  • Amendments to the Personal Data Protection Act

    On 28 March 2008 Croatian Parliament enacted Amendments to the Personal Data Protection Act ("Amendments").
  • Amendments to Civil Obligations Act

    The currently applicable Croatian Civil Obligations Act was enacted in 2005 ("2005 Act") with a goal of harmonizing Croatian legislation with a number of EU Directives relating to combat against late payment in commercial transactions, self-employed commercial agents, sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees, liability for defective products, as well as package travel.
  • Amendments to Electronic Commerce Act

    On 17 June 2008 the Amendments to Electronic Commerce Act ("Amendments") came into force. These amendments are aimed at fully harmonizing Croatian electronic commerce regulations with the relevant EU laws.
  • One-Tier Corporate Governance System Introduced in Croatian Legal System

    On 3 October 2007 Croatian Parliament enacted the Amendments to the Companies Act which should enter into force on 1 April 2008 ("Amendments", "Act"). These Amendments represent the first substantial change to the Act since 2003.
  • New Takeover Act Enacted

  • New Public Procurement Act

    On 1 January 2008 the new Public Procurement Act came into force. The Act was modeled on a number of EU regulations concerning public procurement, most notably directive on coordination of procedures for award of public works, public supply and public service contracts, directive on procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors, as well as directive on review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts.
  • Resignation of a Member of the Management Board

    In a recently published decision, the Croatian High Commercial Court held that in corporations having two-tier corporate structure, the Supervisory board (as a body resolving on appointment and revocation of members of the Management Board) is not authorised or required to resolve on resignation of the Management Board's member. The court was on the standpoint that the resignation has legal effects as of the moment of its delivery to the Supervisory board. As a result, once the Supervisory board receives a resignation of a member of Management Board, it is not to discuss such resignation, but only undertake necessary steps to appoint new member of the Management Board and register the changes with the competent registry court.
  • Constitutional Court Rules on Squeeze Out

    According to recent press release, in February 2007 the Croatian Constitutional Court overruled the claim filed by minority shareholders of Siemens affiliate in Croatia. The minority shareholders requested the Constitutional Court to declare that rules on squeeze-out introduced into Croatian legal system under the 2003 Amendments to Companies Act are in violation of the Croatian Constitution. Under the disputed rules, shareholders' meeting may, at the request of the majority shareholder holding at least 95% of the shares, decide to transfer to such majority shareholder the shares held by minority shareholders, provided that the squeezed-out shareholders are paid appropriate compensation.
  • Regulation on Investment Fund Mergers

    Based on the authority granted under the 2005 Investment Funds Act, on 14 December 2006, the Croatian Agency for Supervision of Financial Services ("Agency") adopted the Regulation on Open Investment Fund Merger. The Regulation sets out a number of rules related to procedure, conditions and methods for merger of open investment funds in Croatia. The Regulation will come into effect on 30 December 2006.

Press Releases worldwide

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to