Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 APRIL 2010

Alternative Offshore Outsourcing Structures

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

In these troubled times, offshore outsourcing retains an allure for businesses. There are still significant savings to be attained from leveraging the benefits of lower offshore operating costs.

United StatesWealth Management

In these troubled times, offshore outsourcing retains an allure for businesses. There are still significant savings to be attained from leveraging the benefits of lower offshore operating costs. But offshoring still comes with risks attached and neither of the two main approaches - full outsourcing to a local provider, or wholly-owned captive entity - is seen as a universal panacea. So, increasingly, companies are looking for smarter ways to access the offshore market while mitigating risks.

Risk mitigation comes in many forms, but it can start with the earliest, most basic decisions in an outsourcing process: that is, how to structure an offshore relationship to reduce risk. This article looks at some of the main alternative offshore outsourcing structures - from virtual captive, to joint venture, to "build-operate-transfer" models - and assesses how they compare in terms of benefits, flexibility and long-term operational suitability.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from