Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MAY 2018

Are Lessors Responsible For Interference With Lessee Quiet Enjoyment Rights?

In the course of an aircraft lease negotiation, the lessee will typically seek to ensure that the lessor provides an express covenant to the lessee that for so long ...

United StatesTransport

Rachel Thomasen is associate in Holland & Knight's London office

In the course of an aircraft lease negotiation, the lessee will typically seek to ensure that the lessor provides an express covenant to the lessee that for so long as no default has occurred and is continuing under the lease, the lessor will not disturb the lessee's quiet use, possession and enjoyment of the aircraft. Some lessee's go further and press for lessor to covenant as to itself as well as any person claiming through the lessor (such as the lessor's financier, the owner — if different from the lessor — or an assignee or transferee of the lessor).

However, should the lessor ultimately be responsible for ensuring that a third party lawfully claiming through it respects the lessee's right to "quiet enjoyment?" Does the fact that such person has provided a quiet enjoyment covenant directly to the lessee absolve the lessor of the obligation to ensure that such third party respects the lessee's

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from