Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 APRIL 2026

US v Heppner: The End Of "Just A Prompt" And Emerging IP Risk

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

Judge Rakoff's ruling in United States v. Heppner establishes that using commercial generative AI tools to process confidential information may destroy attorney-client privilege and work product protection.

United StatesTechnology

AI Insights and Fast Reads

This AI Insights Quick Read series examines a growing risk for innovation-driven businesses: how routine generative AI use can weaken confidentiality, compromise legal review, and erode the value of intellectual property. Across four short pieces, we consider the issue through the lens of US v. Heppner, then turn to shadow AI, the dilution of innovation through AI-generated content and the implications for Canadian organizations.

US v Heppner

Many companies treat generative AI as another productivity layer rather than a legal event. An employee pastes a draft into a chatbot, asks for a summary, cleans up a memo or pressure-tests an argument. It felt informal, disposable, and harmless. Judge Rakoff’s bench ruling in United States v. Heppner should end that illusion.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from