Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 AUGUST 2024

Making The Connection – What Do Recent SEC Enforcement Actions Mean For Cyber Controls?

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

On July 18, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed most of the claims brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission")...

United StatesTechnology

On July 18, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed most of the claims brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") against SolarWinds Corp. ("SolarWinds") and its Chief Information Security Officer ("CISO") in SEC v. SolarWinds Corp. et al. in connection with the SUNBURST attack.1 Among other things, the decision provides important perspective to the debate regarding whether controls associated with cybersecurity matters are covered by the internal accounting controls provisions of Section 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). The court's dismissal in SolarWinds follows in sharp contrast to the Commission's June 18, 2024 settlement with R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company ("RRD") relating to cybersecurity incidents, including violations of Section 13(b)(2)(B) with regard to internal accounting controls, and Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(a) with regard to disclosure

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from