Balancing Scales: Limiting AI In Legal Proceedings

As technology advances, the debate around the use of Artificial Intelligence ("AI") in the courtroom intensifies. In a world where algorithms can predict our next move, the courtroom remains a sacred space for human judgment – one that could be easily influenced by AI. For example, I asked ChatGPT to create the title for this blog article. In a matter of seconds, ChatGPT created a list of ten (10) different titles for me. What would happen if I asked ChatGPT to assist in analyzing evidence?

Several judges and courts issued standing orders or guidelines regarding the use of AI in legal proceedings. The current focus of the AI debate ensures transparency, accountability and the protection of the parties' rights. Chief Justice John Roberts said, "I predict that judicial work – particularly at the trial level – will be significantly affected by AI."¹ Some orders require that any AI tools used be clearly explained to all parties, or that human oversight is mandated in