Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 OCTOBER 2023

Tax Litigation Developments

Last month, the First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the Tax Court's decision in TBL Licensing LLC v. Commissioner holding that a reorganization resulting in the outbound transfer of intangible property (IP)...

United StatesTax

Last month, the First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the Tax Court's decision in TBL Licensing LLC v. Commissioner holding that a reorganization resulting in the outbound transfer of intangible property (IP) led to immediate recognition of the gain in the transferred IP under section 367(d). See No. 22-1783 (1st Cir. Sept. 8, 2023), aff'g 158 T.C. No. 1 (2022). The dispute in TBL Licensing arose in connection with a restructuring that took place after the 2011 merger of VF Corporation (VF) and The Timberland Company (Timberland). Roughly $1.5 billion of Timberland's value was attributable to its IP. After the merger, TBL Licensing LLC (TBL), a domestic corporation for federal income tax purposes and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of VF, owned the Timberland IP. The transaction at issue here was an F reorganization, which the parties agreed involved a transfer of the Timberland IP to a related foreign corporation and thus that section 367(d) applied. But the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from